Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Green economic developmentand entrepreneurship transformation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2024.120409

Abstract

Objective: The article aims to analyse the role of entrepreneurship transformation in attaining green economic development among EU countries for the 2007-2022 period.

Research Design & Methods: This study applied the following methods to check the hypothesis of the study: the Malmquist‒Luenberger productivity index for measuring green economic development; fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS) and dynamic ordinary least squares (DOLS), systems and first-difference generalized method of moments (GMM) – to check the entrepreneurship transformation effect on green economic development.

Findings: The findings of the study demonstrate a strong positive correlation between green economic development and the transformation of entrepreneurship, highlighting the crucial link between economic prosperity and initiatives in the green economy. The analysis confirms that historical changes in productivity related to green economic practices have a positive effect on future developments. Furthermore, the significant coefficients for green economic development emphasize the enduring nature of green economic practices.

Implications & Recommendations: The empirical results allowed us to outline the following suggestions: 1) government policies should focus on initial investments in green practices, incentivizing businesses through financial mechanisms and robust regulations to foster economic and environmental sustainability; 2) enhancing green economic development requires simplifying the process for creating new businesses, particularly green startups, and offering financial and procedural support to inject innovation and economic vitality into the sector; 3) trade openness is crucial for boosting green economy productivity, necessitating policies that lower trade barriers while incorporating environmental standards to ensure sustainable growth; 4) fostering innovation in environmental technologies with increased government funding and strategic partnerships between academia, industry, and government needed to propel sustainable economic transformation.

Contribution & Value Added: The value added by this article lies in its empirical grounding and practical implications, which guide policymakers regarding the importance of supporting entrepreneurial initiatives to drive green economic development. It suggests targeted government policies that incentivize the adoption of green practices, simplify processes for new green startups, promote trade openness, and foster innovation through increased funding and collaboration.

Keywords

sustainable development, business, green growth, green business, innovation

(PDF) Save

References

  1. Acs, Z.J., Audretsch, D.B., & Lehmann, E.E. (2013). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 41, 757-774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9505-9
  2. Acs, Z.J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D.B., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entre-preneurship. Small Business Economics, 32, 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3
  3. Aghion, P., Hemous, D., & Veugelers, R. (2009). No green growth without innovation. Bruegel Policy Brief-2009/07. Retrieved from https://sallan.org/pdf-docs/Bruegel_CarbonInnovation.pdf on March 2, 2024.
  4. Ang, B.W. (2004). Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method?. Ener-gy Policy, 32(9), 1131-1139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00076-4
  5. Ansah, R.H., & Sorooshian, S. (2019). Green economy: Private sectors’ response to climate change. Environ-mental Quality Management, 28(3), 63-69. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.21620
  6. Ashraf, J. (2024). How do institutional factors affect sustainable development? A comparative analysis. Eco-nomic Change and Restructuring, 57, 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-024-09580-6
  7. Audretsch, D.B., Keilbach, M., & Lehmann, E.E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Oxford Uni-versity Press.
  8. Avlogiaris, G., Farmaki, P., & Katarachia, A. (2023). State and Entrepreneurship on the Road to Green Growth in a Post Lignite Era: Friends or Foes?. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 15(2), 90-96. https://doi.org/10.24818/ejis.2023.18
  9. ben Amara, D., Hong, C., & Hafeez, M. (2019). Evaluating the eco-innovation strategy in business opportuni-ty identification-enterprise business growth nexus. International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, 11(3-4), 272-291. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISCM.2019.107517
  10. Bogoslov, I.A., Lungu, A.E., Stoica, E.A., & Georgescu, M.R. (2022). European Green Deal Impact on Entrepre-neurship and Competition: A Free Market Approach. Sustainability, 14(19), 12335. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912335
  11. Brych, V., Zatonatska, T., Dluhopolskyi, O., Borysiak, O., & Vakun, O. (2021). Estimating the Efficiency of the Green Energy Services’ Marketing Management Based on Segmentation. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 188-198. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2021.3-16
  12. Chen, P., Xi, J., Li, Y., Ozturk, I., Ullah, S., & Hafeez, M. (2024). How do mineral resources trade and financial development affect green entrepreneurship in resource-rich economies?. Resources Policy, 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104441
  13. Chen, Y., Lyulyov, O., Pimonenko, T., & Kwilinski, A. (2023). Green development of the country: Role of mac-roeconomic stability. Energy & Environment, 0. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X231151679
  14. Chkareuli, V., Darguashvili, G., Atstaja, D., & Susniene, R. (2024). Assessing the Financial Viability and Sus-tainability of Circular Business Models in the Wine Industry: A Comparative Analysis to Traditional Line-ar Business Model—Case of Georgia. Sustainability, 16(7), 2877. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072877
  15. Chygryn, O., Kuzior, A., Olefirenko, O., & Uzik, J. (2022). Green Brand as a New Pattern of Energy-Efficient Consumption. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 78-87. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2022.3-07
  16. Chygryn, O., Ziabina, Y., & Iskakov, A. (2023). Communicative Channels of Stakeholder Interaction as an Element of Ensuring Sustainable Development of the Business Sector. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 456, p. 02001). EDP Sciences.
  17. Çidik, M.S., Schiller, G., Zhang, N., Rizzo, A., Tambovceva, T., Bajare, D., & Hendawy, M. (2023). How Does ‘Locality’Matter in Enabling a Circular Built Environment?: A Focus on Space, Knowledge, and Cities. In Creating a Roadmap Towards Circularity in the Built Environment (pp. 251-261). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  18. Cohen, B., & Winn, M.I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Jour-nal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.12.001
  19. Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., & Walsh, J.P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on in-dustrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273
  20. Copeland, B.R., & Taylor, M.S. (2004). Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(1), 7-71. https://doi.org/10.1257/002205104773558047
  21. Dabbous, A., Barakat, K.A., & Kraus, S. (2023). The impact of digitalization on entrepreneurial activity and sustainable competitiveness: A panel data analysis. Technology in Society, 70, 102022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102224
  22. Dabrowski, D., Dabrowski, J., Zamasz, K., & Lis, M. (2023). Driving the Image of an Electricity Supplier through Marketing Activities. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 11(4), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL11_NO4_4
  23. Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z. (2019a). Building a family business brand in the context of the concept of stakeholder-oriented value. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 7, 37-51. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL7_NO2_3
  24. Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z. (2019b). The Selected Aspects of Strategic Management in the City Divided by the Border in the Context of the Development of the Cross-Border Market of Cultural Services. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(1), 130-144. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2019.19.1.10
  25. Dean, J.M., Lovely, M.E., & Wang, H. (2009). Are foreign investors attracted to weak environmen-tal regulations? Evaluating the evidence from China. Journal of Development Economics, 90(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.11.007
  26. Drago, C., & Gatto, A. (2022). An interval-valued composite indicator for energy efficiency and green entre-preneurship. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(5), 2107-2126. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3010
  27. Drożdż, W. (2019). The Development of Electromobility in Poland. Virtual Economics, 2(2), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2019.02.02(4)
  28. European Green Deal Investment Plan. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/649371/EPRS_BRI(2020)649371_EN.pdf. on February 10, 2024.
  29. Fankhauser, S., Bowen, A., Calel, R., Dechezlepretre, A., Grover, D., Rydge, J., & Sato, M. (2013). Who will win the green race? In search of environmental competitiveness and innovation. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 902-913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.007
  30. Frankel, J.A., & Rose, A.K. (2005). Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. Re-view of Economics and Statistics, 87(1), 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1162/0034653053327577
  31. Gavkalova, N., Lola, Y., Prokopovych, S., Akimov, O., Smalskys, V., & Akimova, L. (2022). Innovative Develop-ment of Renewable Energy During the Crisis Period and Its Impact on the Environment. Virtual Econom-ics, 5(1), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2022.05.01(4)
  32. GEM (2024). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Report. Retrieved from https://www.gemconsortium.org/data. Gobniece, Z., February 2, 2024.
  33. Gobniece, Z., & Titko, J. (2024). Staff Competencies for Digital Transformation: Results of Bibliometric Analy-sis. Virtual Economics, 7(1), 25-46. https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2024.07.01(2)
  34. Gracia, O., & Siregar, S.V. (2021). Sustainability practices and the cost of debt: Evidence from ASEAN coun-tries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 300, 126942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126942
  35. Grossman, G.M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press.
  36. Gu, J. (2024). Investor attention and ESG performance: Lessons from China’s manufacturing industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 355, 120483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120483
  37. Hakhverdyan, D., & Shahinyan, M. (2022). Competitiveness, innovation and productivity of the country. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 108-123. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2022.1-08
  38. Hall, B.H., & Helmers, C. (2013). Innovation and diffusion of clean/green technology: Can patent commons help?. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 66(1), 33-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2012.12.008
  39. He, X., & Farouk, A. (2023). Effects of the Green Policy Environment on Renewable Energy In-vestment and Effect Evaluation of Green Policies. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2023, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8698548
  40. Hinderer, S., & Kuckertz, A. (2024). Degrowth attitudes among entrepreneurs hinder fast venture scaling. Business Strategy and the Environment 33(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3735
  41. Horbach, J., Rammer, C., & Rennings, K. (2012). Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact—The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics, 78, 112-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005
  42. Huseynov, A.G. (2021). Impact of environmental innovation on country socioeconomic development. Mar-keting and Management of Innovations, 2, 293-302. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2021.2-24
  43. Hussain, H.I., Haseeb, M., Kamarudin, F., Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z., & Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K. (2021). The role of globalization, economic growth and natural resources on the ecological footprint in Thailand: Evi-dence from nonlinear causal estimations. Processes, 9, 1103. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9071103
  44. Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H., & Shin, Y. (2023). Reflections on “Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels”. Journal of Econometrics, 234, 111-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.01.022
  45. Jaffe, A.B., Newell, R.G., & Stavins, R.N. (2005). A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy. Ecological Economics, 54(2-3), 164-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.027
  46. Jin, C., Lv, Z., Li, Z., & Sun, K. (2023). Green finance, renewable energy and carbon neutrality in OECD coun-tries. Renewable Energy, 211, 279-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.04.105
  47. Kao, C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Eco-nometrics, 90, 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00023-2
  48. Kedward, K., & Ryan-Collins, J. (2022). A green new deal: opportunities and constraints. Economic Policies for Sustainability and Resilience, 269-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84288-8_7
  49. Khalatur, S., & Dubovych, O. (2022). Financial Engineering of Green Finance as an Element of Environmental Innovation Management. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 232-246. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2022.1-17
  50. Kiselicki, M., Kirovska, Z., Josimovski, S., & Anastasovski, M. (2022). E-Commerce as a Revenue Generator for Small and Medium Companies in Developing Countries. Economics and Culture, 19(2), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.2478/jec-2022-0015
  51. Kolosok, S., Saher, L., Kovalenko, Y., & Delibasic, M. (2022). Renewable Energy and Energy Innovations: Ex-amining Relationships Using Markov Switching Regression Model. Marketing and Management of Inno-vations, 2, 151-160. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2022.2-14
  52. Kumar, S., & Managi, S. (2009). The economics of sustainable development: the case of India (Vol. 32). Spring-er Science & Business Media.
  53. Kumar, S., & Russell, R.R. (2002). Technological change, technological catch-up, and capital deepening: rela-tive contributions to growth and convergence. American Economic Review, 92(3), 527-548. https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260136381
  54. Kwilinski, A. (2019). Implementation of Blockchain Technology in Accounting Sphere. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 23, 1-6. Retrieved from https://www.abacademies.org/articles/implementation-of-blockchain-technology-in-accounting-sphere-8219.html on April 2, 2024.
  55. Kwilinski, A. (2023a). E-Commerce and Sustainable Development in the European Union: A Com-prehensive Analysis of SDG2, SDG12, and SDG13. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 11, 87-107. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL11_NO3_5
  56. Kwilinski, A. (2023b). The Relationship between Sustainable Development and Digital Transformation: Bibli-ometric Analysis. Virtual Economics, 6, 56-69. https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2023.06.03(4)
  57. Kwilinski, A. (2024). Understanding the Nonlinear Effect of Digital Technology Development on CO2 Reduc-tion. Sustainable Development, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2964
  58. Kwilinski, A., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2023a). Unlocking Sustainable Value through Digital Transfor-mation: An Examination of ESG Performance. Information, 14, 444. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14080444
  59. Kwilinski, A., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2023b). Spillover Effects of Green Finance on Attaining Sustaina-ble Development: Spatial Durbin Model. Computation, 11, 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation11100199
  60. Kwilinski, A., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2023c). The Role of Country’s Green Brand and Digitalization in Enhancing Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance. Economics and Environment, 87(4), 613. https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2023.87.4.613
  61. Kwilinski, A., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2024). Reducing Transport Sector CO2 Emissions Patterns: Envi-ronmental Technologies and Renewable Energy. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100217
  62. Kwilinski, A., Rebilas, R., Lazarenko, D., Stezhko, N., & Dzwigol, H. (2023d). The Impact of the COVID-19 Pan-demic on the Evolution of Investment Markets in Central and Eastern Europe. Forum Scientiae Oecono-mia, 11(4), 157-186. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL11_NO4_8
  63. Lagodiienko, N., & Yakushko, I. (2021). Digital innovations in taxation: bibliometric analysis. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 66-77. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2021.3-06
  64. Lesniak, A., Surma, T., Szczepanska-Woszczyna, K., & Zamasz, K. (2023). The Recent Development of High-Efficiency Cogeneration Units in Poland. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 11(4), 123-143. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL11_NO4_6
  65. Letunovska, N., Abazov, R., & Chen, Y. (2022). Framing a Regional Spatial Development Perspective: The Relation between Health and Regional Performance. Virtual Economics, 5, 87-99. https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2022.05.04(5)
  66. Li, J., Wu, T., Liu, B., & Zhou, M. (2024). Can digital transformation enhance corporate ESG performance? The moderating role of dual environmental regulations. Finance Research Letters, 62(Part B), 105241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105241
  67. Liargovas, P., Apostolopoulos, N., Pappas, I., & Kakouris, A. (2017). SMEs and green growth: the effectiveness of support mechanisms and initiatives matters. In Green Economy in the Western Balkans: Towards a Sustainable Future. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78714-499-620171004
  68. Luo, F., Wang, Ch., Luo, Sh., Tong, Q., & Xu, L. (2024). Optimizing natural resource markets: Accelerating green growth in the economic recovery. Resources Policy, 89, 104648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104648
  69. Madaleno, M., & Nogueira, M.C. (2023). How renewable energy and CO2 emissions contribute to economic growth, and sustainability—an extensive analysis. Sustainability, 15(5), 4089. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054089
  70. Makhloufi, L. (2023). Predicting the impact of big data analytics capability and green absorptive capacity on green entrepreneurship orientation and eco-innovation. Journal of Enterprising Communities. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-05-2023-0069
  71. Merlin, M.L., & Chen, Y. (2021). Analysis of the factors affecting electricity consumption in DR Congo using fully modified ordinary least square (FMOLS), dynamic ordinary least square (DOLS) and canonical coin-tegrating regression (CCR) estimation approach. Energy, 232, 121025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121025
  72. Mesagan, E.P., & Olunkwa, N.C. (2020). Energy Consumption, Capital Investment and Environmental Degra-dation: The African Experience. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 8(1), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL8_NO1_1
  73. Michalena, E. (2017). Building green growth and entrepreneurship in the Pacific through knowledge and innovation. In Global Opportunities for Entrepreneurial Growth: Coopetition and Knowledge Dynamics within and across Firms. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78714-501-620171027
  74. Michulek, J., & Gajanova, L. (2023). Is the Concept of Industry 4.0 Still Interesting for Scientists due to the Emergence of Industry 5.0? Bibliometric Analysis. Economics and Culture, 20(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.2478/jec-2023-0001
  75. Moskalenko, B., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2022a). The investment attractiveness of countries: coupling between core dimensions. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 10, 153-172. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL10_NO2_8
  76. Nadiroh, & Emilkamayana. (2021). Green economy growth efficiency in support of environmental policy. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 802(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/802/1/012008
  77. Ngondjeb, D.Y., Atewamba, C., & Macalou, M. (2020). Insights on Africa’s Future in its Transition to the Green Economy. In Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44180-7_13
  78. Oh, D.H. (2010). A global Malmquist‒Luenberger productivity index. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34, 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-010-0178-y
  79. Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel Cointegration: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of Pooled Time Series Tests with an Application to the PPP Hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 20, 597-625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466604203073
  80. Pesaran, M.H. (2021). General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Empirical Econom-ics, 60(1), 13-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7
  81. Rajiani, I., & Kot, S. (2020). Javanese Indonesia: Human Resource Management Issues in a Uniquely Collectiv-ist Culture. Cultural Management: Science and Education, 4(2), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.30819/cmse.4-2.01
  82. Raza, S.A., Tunio, M.N., Ali, M., & Puah, C.-H. (2023). Entrepreneurship and green finance practices: Avenues for sustainable business start-ups in Asia. In Entrepreneurship and Green Finance Practices: Avenues for Sustainable Business Start-ups in Asia.
  83. Sánchez-Robles, M., Saura, J.R., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2024). Overcoming the challenges of cooperative startups businesses: insights from a bibliometric network analysis. Review of Managerial Science, 18, 1617-1648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00670-9
  84. Sannikova, A., Vevere, V., & Titko, J. (2023). Competences necessary for a social entrepreneur: a case study of Latvia. Business: Theory and Practice, 24(2), 604-612. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2023.19703
  85. Saura, J.R., Palacios-Marqués, D., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2023). Digital marketing in SMEs via data-driven strategies: Reviewing the current state of research. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(3), 1278-1313. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1955127
  86. Saura, J.R., Skare, M., & Riberio-Navarrete, S. (2022a). How Does Technology Enable Competitive Advantage? Reviewing State of the Art and Outlining Future Directions. Journal of Competitiveness, 14(4), 172-188. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2022.04.10
  87. Saura, J.R., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2022b). Adopting digital reservation systems to enable circular economy in entrepreneurship. Management Decision, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2022-0190
  88. Shrestha, N. (2020). Detecting multicollinearity in regression analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathe-matics and Statistics, 8(2), 39-42. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajams-8-2-1
  89. Sifa, S.F., Sultana, R., & Bodrud-Doza, M. (2021). Climate Change and COVID-19: Crisis Within Crises for Erad-ication of Poverty in Bangladesh. In Environmental Footprints and Eco-Design of Products and Processes. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3860-2_7
  90. Singh, A.K., Jyoti, B., & Mishra, V.K. (2023). Policy implications from selected countries for a sustainable fu-ture of the society through green entrepreneurship and economic development. In Entrepreneurship Ecosystems and Their Opportunities and Challenges. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-7140-1.ch006
  91. Sotarauta, M., Suvinen, N., Jolly, S., & Hansen, T. (2021). The many roles of change agency in the game of green path development in the North. European Urban and Regional Studies, 28(2), 92-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776420944995
  92. Sulich, A., & Zema, T. (2023). The Green Energy Transition in Germany: A Bibliometric Study. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 11(2), 175-195. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL11_NO2_9
  93. Sulich, A., Zema, T., & Zema, P. (2018, May). Green entrepreneurship in the European integration context. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on European Integration (pp. 1393-1400).
  94. Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K., & Gatnar, S. (2022). Key Competences of Research and Development Project Managers in High Technology Sector. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 10, 107-130. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL10_NO3_6
  95. Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K., & Muras, W. (2023). Shareholders and the Long-Term Ability of a Company to Value Creation: The Case of the It Sector. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 28(2), 323-348. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2023.28.2.19
  96. Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K., Gedvilaitė, D., Nazarko, J., Stasiukynas, A., & Rubina, A. (2022). Assessment of Economic Convergence among Countries in the European Union. Technological and Economic Develop-ment of Economy, 28, 1572-1588. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2022.17518
  97. Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K., Vysochyna, A., & Kwilinski, A. (2024). Public Health Efficiency and Country Com-petitiveness: Empirical Study in Pre-Pandemic and Pandemic Periods. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 12(1), 151-166. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL12_NO1_8
  98. Titko, J., Svirina, A., Astikė, K., Uzule, K., Shina, I., & Zarina, V. (2023a). Impact of country-level cultural devel-opment on the achievement of sustainable development goals. Business, Management and Economics Engineering, 21(2), 269-278.
  99. Titko, J., Tambovceva, T., Atstāja, D., Lapinskaitė, I., Solesvik, M.Z., Svirina, A., & Uzule, K. (2023b). Attitudes Towards Sustainable Entrepreneurship among Students: A Pilot Study in Latvia and Lithuania. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 13(1), 107-132. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2023-0006
  100. Tkachenko, V., Klymchuk, M., & Ivakhnenko, I. (2019). Scientific prediction of the balanced ener-gy saving development strategy of the construction projects. Virtual Economics, 2(2), 70-84. https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2019.02.02(5)
  101. Urbaniec, M., Tomala, J., & Martinez, S. (2021). Measurements and trends in technological eco-innovation: Evidence from environment-related patents. Resources, 10(7), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10070068
  102. Us, Y., & Gerulaitiene, N. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis of the Global Research Landscape on Healthcare Resilience During Critical Events. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 11(3), 159-188. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL11_NO3_9
  103. Vaníčková, R., & Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K. (2020). Innovation of Business and Marketing Plan of Growth Strategy and Competitive Advantage in Exhibition Industry. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21(2), 425-445. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2020.21.2.30
  104. Veckalne, R., Kapustins, M., & Tambovceva, T. (2023). Smart Cities, Green Diets: How the Lucy Veg App Supports Valencia’s Vegan Community and Contributes to SDGs. Virtual Economics, 6(2), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2023.06.02(1)
  105. Wei, X., Ren, H., Ullah, S., & Bozkurt, C. (2023). Does environmental entrepreneurship play a role in sustain-able green development? Evidence from emerging Asian economies. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 36(1), 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2067887
  106. Westerlund, J., & Edgerton, D. (2008). A simple test for cointegration in dependent panels with structural breaks, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70(5), 665-704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00513.x
  107. Wróblewski, Ł., & Lis, M. (2021). Marketing Mix of Cultural Institutions on the Cross-Border Market of a City Divided by a Border – An Analysis and Evaluation. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 23(2), 555-572. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2021.23.2.33
  108. Wu, H. (2022). Trade openness, green finance and natural resources: A literature review. Resources Policy, 78, 102801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102801
  109. Wu, X., Li, L., Liu, D., & Li, Q. (2024). Technology empowerment: Digital transformation and enterprise ESG performance—Evidence from China’s manufacturing sector. PLoS ONE, 19(4), e0302029. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.030202
  110. Yang, S., & Liu, F. (2024). Impact of industrial intelligence on green total factor productivity: The indispensa-bility of the environmental system. Ecological Economics, 216, 108021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108021
  111. Yu, H., & Zheng, Ch. (2024). Environmental Regulation, Land Use Efficiency and Industrial Structure Upgrad-ing: Test Analysis Based on Spatial Durbin Model and Threshold Effect. Heliyon, 10(5), e26508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26508
  112. Zhanibek, A., Abazov, R., & Khazbulatov, A. (2022). Digital Transformation of a Country’s Image: The Case of the Astana International Finance Centre in Kazakhstan. Virtual Economics, 5, 71-94. https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2022.05.02(4)
  113. Zhao, X., Mahendru, M., Ma, X., Rao, A., & Shang, Y. (2022). Impacts of environmental regulations on green economic growth in China: New guidelines regarding renewable energy and energy efficiency. Renewa-ble Energy, 187, 728-742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.076
  114. Zheng, R., Osabohien, R., Madueke, E., & Jaaffar, A.H.B. (2023). Renewable energy consumption and busi-ness density as drivers of sustainable development. Frontiers in Energy Research, 11, 1268903. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2023.1268903
  115. Zhou, P., & Ang, B.W. (2008). Linear programming models for measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance. Energy Policy, 36(8), 2911-2916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.03.041
  116. Ziabina, Y., & Dzwigol-Barosz, M. (2022). A Country’s Green Brand and the Social Responsibility of Business. Virtual Economics, 5(3), 31-49. https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2022.05.03(2)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.