How software robots can facilitate the procurement process? A case study of Siemens in the Czech Republic

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the article is to evaluate whether technological changes adopted in procurement can support the strategy of the firm and to observe the software robots’ implementation phase in procurement.

Research Design & Methods: In order to reach the article objective, a single case study methodology was applied. The analysis focused on the Siemens company.

Findings: Digitalisation strategy in procurement can support the firm’s strategy of global leadership and further growth through increased efficiency, focus on value-added activities, increased transparency in processes, easier cooperation between the involved parties, and the worldwide reach of suppliers. The potential for further use of software robots has been identified among repetitive processes with no value-added but securing the smooth and errorless flow of information and documents. For this purpose, we propose a more detailed definition of the procurement cycle.

Implications & Recommendations: Three processes were selected for potential dedication to software robots which can serve as a recommendation to companies to improve the efficiency and competitiveness of their supply chains.

Contribution & Value Added: To identify gaps for digitalisation in the procurement process, the “procurement cycle” was used. We found that the processes must be defined in a more detailed way in order to serve the analysis.

Keywords

supply chain, procurement, digitalization, information technologies, industry 4.0, Czech Republic

Author Biography

Eva Křenková

Assistant Professor in the Department of International Business at the Faculty of International Relations, the University of Economics, Prague. Her research interests include logistics and supply chain management.

Karolína Rieser

PhD candidate in the Department of International Business at the Faculty of International Relations, the University of Economics, Prague. Her research interests include international trade and digital technologies.

Alexej Sato

Professor in the Department of International Business at the Faculty of International Relations, the University of Economics, Prague. His research interests include customs and trade facilitation.

References

1. Anaya, L., Dulaimi, M., & Abdallah, S. (2015). An investigation into the role of enterprise information sys-tems in enabling business innovation. Business Process Management Journal, 21(4), 771-790. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-11-2014-0108
2. Bienhaus, F., & Haddud, A. (2018). Procurement 4.0: factors influencing the digitisation of procurement and supply chains. Business Process Management Journal, 24(4), 965-984. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2017-0139
3. Busch, J. (2016). The Digital Supply Chain: How Should Procurement Respond?. Retrieved from: http://spendmatters.com/2016/08/09/digital-supply-chain-procurement-respond/ on July 17, 2019.
4. Confederation of Industry of the Czech Republic (2019). Výsledky průzkumu SP ČR o zavádění Průmyslu 4.0 ve firmách. Retrieved from https://www.spcr.cz/aktivity/z-hospodarske-politiky/13110-vysledky-pruzkumu-sp-cr-o-zavadeni-prumyslu-4-0-ve-firmach on January 12, 2020.
5. Delloite (2019). Robotic Process Automation. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/cz/en/pages/strategy-operations/solutions/robotic-process-automation.html/ on July 17, 2019.
6. Filippov, S., & Duysters, G. (2014). Exploring the drivers and elements of subsidiary evolution in several new EU member states International. Journal of Emerging Markets, 9(1), 120-146. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-03-2011-0022
7. Geissbauer, R., Weissbarth, R., & Wetzstein, J. (2016). Procurement 4.0. Are you ready for the digital revolu-tion?. Retrieved from www.strategyand.pwc.com/ on July 17, 2019.
8. Ghadimi, P., Wang, Ch., Lim, M.K., & Heavey, C. (2019). Intelligent sustainable supplier selection using multi-agent technology: Theory and application for Industry 4.0 supply chains. Computers & Industrial Engi-neering, 127, 588-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.10.050
9. Hill, W.L., & Hult, G.T.M. (2018). Global Business Today. New-York: McGraw-Hill Education.
10. ISO (2012). ISO 8373:2012 Robots and robotic devices – Vocabulary. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/ on July 17, 2019.
11. Johansson, R. (2007). On Case Study Methodology. Open House International, 32, 48-54. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811206542_0002
12. Kedziora, D., & Kiviranta, H-M. (2018). Digital Business Value Creation with Robotic Process Automation (RPA) in Northern and Central Europe. Management, 13(2), 161-174. https://doi.org/10.26493/1854-4231.13.161-174
13. Kosmol, T., Reimann, F., & Kaufmann, L. (2019). You’ll never walk alone: Why we need a supply chain prac-tice view on digital procurement. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Chain management, 25, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3423299
14. Knudsen, D. (2003). Aligning corporate strategy, procurement strategy and e-procurement tools. IJPDLM, 33(8), 720-734. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/09600030310502894
15. Lacity, M., & Willcocks, L. (2016). Robotic Process Automation: The Next Transformation Lever for Shared Services. Retrieved from http://www.umsl.edu/~lacitym/OUWP1601.pdf on January 12, 2020.
16. Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E. de F.R., & Ramos, L.F.P. (2017). Past, present and future of Industry 4.0 - a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. International Journal of Production Research, 55(12), 3609-3629. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1308576
17. Merriam, S.B. (1985). The Case Study in Educational Research: A Review of Selected Literature. The Journal of Educational Thought, 19(3), 204-217. https://doi.org/10.11575/jet.v19i3.44167
18. Murphy, R. (2017). How IBM is leveraging the power of RPA to speed up its procure to pay process. Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/blogs/insights-on-business/gbs-strategy/blocked-invoice-process-management/ on July 17, 2019.
19. Nagy, J., Oláh, J., Erdei, E., Máté, D., & Popp, J. (2018). The Role and Impact of Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things on the Business Strategy of the Value Chain-The Case of Hungary. Sustainability, 10(3491). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103491
20. Neil, J. (2018). Supply Chain Digitalization – Delivering Sustainable Cross-Functional Change. Journal of Busi-ness Forecasting, Winter 2017-2018, 36-39. Retrieved from https://ibf.org/knowledge/jbf-articles/supply-chain-digitalization-delivering-sustainable-cross-functional-change-1164 on July 17, 2019.
21. Noyes, K. (2016). 5 things you need to know about A.I.: Cognitive, neural and deep, oh my!. Retrieved from https://www.computerworld.com/article/3040563/5-things-you-need-to-know-about-ai-cognitive-neural-and-deep-oh-my.html/ on July 17, 2019.
22. Pearcy, D.H., Parker, D.B., & Giunipero, L.C. (2008). Using Electronic Procurement to Facilitate Supply Chain Integration: An Exploratory Study of US-based Firms. American Business Law Journal, 23(1), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/19355181200800002
23. Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.
24. Rushton, A., Croucher, P., & Baker, P. (2017). The Handbook of Logistics and Distribution Management, 6th ed., London, UK: Kogan Page Limited.
25. Rymarczyk, J. (2020). Technologies, Opportunities and Challenges of the Industrial Revolution 4.0: Theoreti-cal Considerations. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(1), 185-198. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080110
26. Rymarczyk, J. (2021). The impact of industrial revolution 4.0 on international trade. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 9(1), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2021.090107
27. Schatsky, D., Muraskin, C., & Iyengar, K. (2016). Robotic process automation. A path to the cognitive enter-prise. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/insights/us/articles/3451_Signals_Robotic-process-automation/DUP_Signals_Robotic-process-automation.pdf/ on July 17, 2019.
28. Sieja, M., & Wach, K. (2019). The Use of Evolutionary Algorithms for Optimization in the Modern Entrepre-neurial Economy: Interdisciplinary Perspective. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(4), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2019.070407
29. Siemens (2018). Siemens sets future course with Vision 2020+. Retrieved from https://press.siemens.com/global/en/pressrelease/siemens-sets-future-course-vision-2020/ on July 17, 2019.
30. Siemens (2019). Annual Report 2019. Retrieved from https://assets.new.siemens.com/siemens/assets/api/uuid:59a922d1-eca0-4e23-adef-64a05f0a8a61/siemens-ar2019.pdf/ on January 12, 2020.
31. Srai, J.S., & Lorentz, H. (2019). Developing design principles for the digitalisation of purchasing
32. and supply management. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 25(1), 78-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2018.07.001
33. Stuart, I., McCutcheon, D., Handfield, R., McLachlin, R., & Samson, D. (2002). Effective case research in oper-ations management: a process perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 20, 419-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00022-0
34. Szalavetz, A. (2016). Global Crisis and Upgrading of MNCS’ Manufacturing Subsidiaries: A Case Study of Hun-gary. Central European Business Review, 5(1), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.143
35. Szalavetz, A. (2017). The Environmental Impact of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies: Examples from Hungary. Central European Business Review, 6(2), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.177
36. Szozda, N. (2017). Industry 4.0 and its impact on the functioning of supply chains. LogForum, 13(4), 401-414. https://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2017.4.2
37. Vaidya, S., Ambad, P., & Bhosle, S. (2018). Industry 4.0 – A Glimpse. Procedia Manufacturing, 20, 233-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.034
38. Veile, J.W., Kiel, D., Müller, J.M., & Voigt, K.I. (2019). Lessons learned from Industry 4.0 implementation in the German manufacturing industry. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, ahead-of-print no. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-08-2018-0270
39. Vollmer, M. (2017). Robotic Process Automation: Procurement’s Next Big Thing Or Next Big Hype?. Retrieved from https://www.digitalistmag.com/ on July 17, 2019.
40. Woiceshyn, J., & Daellenbach, U. (2018). Evaluating inductive vs deductive research in management studies. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 13(2), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-06-2017-1538
41. Yin, R.K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications, 6th ed., Los Angeles, USA: SAGE Publications, Inc.