Links between the economy competitiveness and logistics performance in the Visegrád Group countries: Empirical evidence for the years 2007-2018


Abstract

Objective: The objective of the article is to examine the relationship of competitiveness and logistics performance and – on the basis of this relationship – inspect which of the 12 pillars of the Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) reveal developments in the logistics performance of Visegrád Group (V4) countries. Next, we analyse the possibility of creating a common indicator number, by which the index formulated based on the GCI pillars and the Logistics Performance Index (LPI) values can simultaneously express competitiveness and logistics development level.

Research Design & Methods: For our research, we used the time series from the Logistic Performance Index published every three years by the World Bank and the Global Competitiveness Index annually published by the World Economic Forum. We analysed the correlation between the pillars of the GCI and the index components of the LPI and then chose pillars that make it apparent how competitiveness determines the development level of logistics. To that end, we first used the Pearson correlation coefficient and, later, structural equation modelling. We performed the examination of the logistics development level of V4 countries based on the competitiveness pillars by objective index values, but also by comparison to countries that are on top of the LPI ranking.

Findings: Institutions, adoption of information and communication technology (ICT), and Innovation have the most defining effect on logistics performance in V4. The countries of V4 were successful in improving the performance level of their logistics sector, but the performance of Poland and the Czech Republic exceeds the performance of Slovakia and Hungary in practically all of the studied areas.

Implications & Recommendations: The present study primarily highlights the fact that further efficient development can only be realised by appropriately harmonising the activities of economic policymakers and actors. The examined V4 countries showed similar development levels, so we also gave them similar suggestions, which mainly include the development of the info-communication sector and the improvement in the effectiveness of the Institutions competitiveness pillar.

Contribution & Value Added: The last time V4 countries logistics capabilities were scrutinised was in 2015. Since then, the pillar structure of the World Economic Forum underwent a significant change. This study examines the group’s logistics performance by using more up-to-date data and highlighting the way for further research activities by searching for comparative advantages, which may allow V4 countries to further increase their competitiveness and logistics performance.


Keywords

competitiveness; logistics; performance; The Visegrad Group; development

Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Afum, E., & Ahenkorah, E. (2020). Exploring financial performance and green logistics management practices: examining the mediating influences of market, environmental and social per-formances. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120613. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120613

Ahmad, N., & Mehmood, R. (2016). Enterprise systems and performance of future city logistics. Production Planning & Control, 27(6), 500-513. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTTLF/Resources/lpireport.pdf on November 12, 2020.

Arvis, J.F., Ojala, L., Wiederer, C., Shepherd, B., Raj, A., Dairabayeva, K., & Kiiski, T. (2007). Connecting to Compete 2007. Trade Logistics in the Global Economy. World Bank. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/29971/LPI2018.pdf on November 10, 2020.

Arvis, J.F., Ojala, L., Wiederer, C., Shepherd, B., Raj, A., Dairabayeva, K., & Kiiski, T. (2010). Connecting to Compete 2010. Trade Logistics in the Global Economy. World Bank. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTTLF/Resources/LPI2010_for_web.pdf on November 10, 2020.

Arvis, J.F., Ojala, L., Wiederer, C., Shepherd, B., Raj, A., Dairabayeva, K., & Kiiski, T. (2012). Connecting to Compete 2012. Trade Logistics in the Global Economy. World Bank. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/TRADE/Resources/239070-1336654966193/LPI_2012_final.pdf on November 10, 2020.

Arvis, J.F., Ojala, L., Wiederer, C., Shepherd, B., Raj, A., Dairabayeva, K., & Kiiski, T. (2014). Connecting to Compete 2014. Trade Logistics in the Global Economy. World Bank. Retrieved from https://lpi.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/LPI_Report_2014.pdf on November 10, 2020.

Arvis, J.F., Ojala, L., Wiederer, C., Shepherd, B., Raj, A., Dairabayeva, K., & Kiiski, T. (2016). Connecting to Compete 2016. Trade Logistics in the Global Economy. World Bank. Retrieved from https://wb-lpi-media.s3.amazonaws.com/LPI_Report_2016.pdf on November 10, 2020.

Arvis, J.F., Ojala, L., Wiederer, C., Shepherd, B., Raj, A., Dairabayeva, K., & Kiiski, T. (2018). Connecting to Compete 2018. Trade Logistics in the Global Economy. World Bank. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/29971/LPI2018.pdf on November 10, 2020.

Bates, O., Friday, A., Allen, J., McLeod, F., Cherrett, T., Wise, S., Piecyk, M., Piotrowska, M., Bektas, T., & Ngu-yen, T. (2018). ICT for Sustainable Last-Mile Logistics: Data, People and Parcels. 49-29. https://doi.org/10.29007/67nl

Beysenbaev, R., & Dus, Y. (2020). Proposals for improving the Logistics Performance Index. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 36(1), 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2019.10.001

Białobłocka, M. (2019). Intermodal transportation in the countries of the Visegrad group: The state of de-velopment and the peculiarities of reform (pp. 48-55). In N. Panczak-Białobłocka (Ed.), Problemy bezpie-czeństwa w procesach politycznej i społecznej transformacji w krajach Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej. Kut-no: Wyższa Szkoła Gospodarki Krajowej. Retrieved from https://filos.lnu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Konferencja_Kutno2019.pdf#page=48 on November 15, 2020.

Björklund, M., & Forslund, H. (2018). Exploring the sustainable logistics innovation process. Industrial Man-agement & Data Systems, 118(1), 204-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-02-2017-0058

C4L. (2017). LPI Survey Lux 2016—Cluster for Logistics. Retrieved from https://www.clusterforlogistics.lu/why-luxembourg/lpi-survey-lux-2016 on November 26, 2020.

Carlan, V., Lepori, C., & Milenkovic, M. (2017). Scoping Logistics Clusters. EU – Clusters 2.0 Consortium.

Çemberci, M., Civelek, M.E., & Canbolat, N. (2015). The Moderator Effect of Global Competitiveness Index on Dimensions of Logistics Performance Index. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1514-1524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.453

Chung, T.W. (2016). A Study on Logistics Cluster Competitiveness among Asia Main Countries using the Porter’s Diamond Model. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 32(4), 257-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2016.12.010

Cieślik, A., Qu, Y., & Qu, T. (2018). Innovations and Export Performance: Firm Level Evidence from China. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 6(4), 27-47. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2018.060402

Civelek, M.E., Uca, N., & Çemberci, M. (2015). The mediator effect of logistics performance index on the relation between global competitiveness index and gross domestic product. European Scientific Journal, 11(3), 368-375. Retrieved from https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/5658 on November 11, 2020.

Delfmann, W., Albers, S., & Gehring, M. (2002). The impact of electronic commerce on logistics service pro-viders. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 32(3), 203-222. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030210426539

Dorożyński, T., & Kuna-Marszałek, A. (2015). Investment Attractiveness of Visegrad Group Countries: Com-parative Analysis. In T. Dorożyński, & A. Kuna-Marszałek (Eds.), Banking, Finance, and Accounting: Con-cepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 740-775). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6268-1

Duran, O., & Afonso, P.S.L.P. (2020). An activity based costing decision model for life cycle economic assess-ment in spare parts logistic management. International Journal of Production Economics, 222, 107499. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.09.020

European Commission (2016). Transport sector economic analysis. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/research-topic/transport-sector-economic-analysis on October 30, 2021.

Fabrigar, L.R., Wegener, D.T. MacCallum, R.C. & Strahan, E.J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272-299. http://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272

Ghoumrassi, A., & Tigu, G. (2018). The impact of the logistics management in customer satisfaction. Proceed-ings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 12(1), 407-415. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2018-0036

Handfield, R.B., & Withers, B. (1993). A comparison of logistics management in Hungary, China, Korea, and Japan. Journal of Business Logistics, 14(1), 81-109. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-COMPARISON-OF-LOGISTICS-MANAGEMENT-IN-HUNGARY%2C-Handfield-Withers/415eb5b9b21646dec0ee277716c1c511de9a7fc8 on November 14, 2020

Hwang, D.W., Hong, P.C., & Lee, D.Y. (2017). Critical factors that affect logistics performance: A comparison of China, Japan and Korea. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 9(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL.2017.080587

Jhawar, A., & Garg, S.K. (2016). System Dynamics Modelling to Study the Effects of Investment in Information Technology on Logistics Performance: A Case Study from India. International Journal of System Dynamics Applications, 5(2), 19-40. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSDA.2016040102

Kasarda, J. (2016). Logistics Is about Competitiveness and More. Logistics, 1(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics1010001

Kiisler, A. (2008). Logistics in Estonian Business Companies. Transport, 23(4), 356-362. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648-4142.2008.23.356-362

Lai, K., & Cheng, T.C.E. (2016). Just-in-Time Logistics (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315590875

Magill, L.J., Jafarifar, N., Watson, A., & Omotayo, T. (2020). 4D BIM integrated construction supply chain logistics to optimise on-site production. International Journal of Construction Management, 1-10. http://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1786623

Norris, M., & Lecavalier, L. (2009). Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Developmental Disa-bility Psychological Research. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(1), 8-20. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0816-2

O’Leary, J.T., & Lee, G. (2015). Importance-performance analysis. In J. Jafari & H. Xiao (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Tourism (pp. 1-2). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01669-6_371-1

Primiana, I., Juanim, Y.A., Yunani, A., & Herwany, A. (2016). Improvement Strategy for Supply Chain Perfor-mance of the Garment Industry to Decrease Logistics Costs and Enhance Competitiveness. Journal of In-dustrial and Intelligent Information, 4(2), 121-124. https://doi.org/10.18178/jiii.4.2.121-124

Puertas, R., Martí, L., & García, L. (2014). Logistics performance and export competitiveness: European expe-rience. Empirica, 41(3), 467-480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-013-9241-z

Ren, R., Hu, W., Dong, J., Sun, B., Chen, Y., & Chen, Z. (2020). A systematic literature review of green and sustainable logistics: bibliometric analysis, research trend and knowledge taxonomy. International Jour-nal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1), 261. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010261

Rapcsák T. (2007). Többszempontú döntési problémák. BCE-MTA SZTAKI. Retrieved from http://www.oplab.sztaki.hu/tanszek/download/I_Tobbsz_dont_modsz.pdf on November 28, 2020.

Roekel, W.V. (2017). Improving the logistics performance index (lpi) by assigning weights to its six core com-ponents, using the best-worst method. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Delft University of technology, Delft, Netherlands.

Ricci, A. (2018). Is There Social or Monetary Dumping in the European Union? Manufacturing Competitive-ness in Central and Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(1), 159-180. http://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2019.070109

Roscoe, S., Cousins, P.D., & Lamming, R.C. (2016). Developing eco-innovations: A three-stage typology of supply networks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(3), 1948-1959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.125

Rymarczyk, J. (2020). Technologies, opportunities and challenges of the Industrial Revolution 4.0: Theoreti-cal considerations. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(1), 185-198. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080110

Rymarczyk, J. (2021). The impact of industrial revolution 4.0 on international trade. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 9(1), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2021.090107

Schwab, K. (2007). The Global Competitiveness Report 2007. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2006-07.pdf on December 3, 2020.

Schwab, K. (2008). The Global Competitiveness Report 2008. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2008-09.pdf on December 3, 2020.

Schwab, K. (2009). The Global Competitiveness Report 2009. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2009-10.pdf on December 3, 2020.

Schwab, K. (2010). The Global Competitiveness Report 2010. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2010-11.pdf on December 3, 2020.

Schwab, K. (2011). The Global Competitiveness Report 2011. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GCR_Report_2011-12.pdf on December 3, 2020.

Schwab, K. (2012). The Global Competitiveness Report 2012. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2012-13.pdf on December 3, 2020.

Schwab, K. (2013). The Global Competitiveness Report 2007. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2013-14.pdf on December 3, 2020.

Schwab, K. (2014). The Global Competitiveness Report 2007. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2014-15.pdf on December 3, 2020.

Schwab, K. (2015). The Global Competitiveness Report 2007. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-competitiveness-report-2015 on December 3, 2020.

Schwab, K. (2016). The Global Competitiveness Report 2007. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/gcr/2015-2016/Global_Competitiveness_Report_2015-2016.pdf on De-cember 3, 2020.

Schwab, K. (2017). The Global Competitiveness Report 2007. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR2016-2017/05FullReport/TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2016-2017_FINAL.pdf on December 3, 2020.

Schwab, K. (2018). The Global Competitiveness Report 2007. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR2018/05FullReport/TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2018.pdf on December 3, 2020.

Sieja, M., & Wach, K. (2019). The Use of Evolutionary Algorithms for Optimization in the Modern Entrepre-neurial Economy: Interdisciplinary Perspective. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(4), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2019.070407

Siudek, T., & Zawojska, A. (2014). Competitiveness in the economic concepts, theories and empirical re-search. Oeconomia, 13(1), 91-108. Retrieved from http://www.oeconomia.actapol.net/pub/13_1_91.pdf on December 8, 2020.

Tongzon, J. (2007). Determinants of Competitiveness in Logistics: Implications for the ASEAN Region. Mari-time Economics & Logistics, 9(1), 67-83. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100172

Tóth, B.L. (2019). The Visegrád Group and the railway development interest articulation in Central Eastern Europe. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 10(2), 175-195. Retrieved from https://ejes.uaic.ro/articles/EJES2019_1002_TOT.pdf on December 2, 2020.

Veres, L. (2015). Logistics strategies in the Visegrad countries: A comparative analysis (p. 213). Hungarian Logistics Association Budapest. Retrieved from http://v4log.eu/download/V4STUDY-final.pdf on Decem-ber 2, 2020.

Wang, M., Wang, Y., Liu, W., Ma, Y., Xiang, L., Yang, Y., & Li, X. (2021). How to achieve a win-win scenario between cost and customer satisfaction for cold chain logistics? Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 566, 125637. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2020.125637

Włodarczyk, A., & Mesjasz-Lech, A. (2019). Development of Road Transport Logistic Infrastructure and Air Pollution in the Visegrad Group Countries. Journal of Economic and Social Development, 6(1), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.26352/DJ02F5011

Yildirim, B.F., & Adiguzel Mercangoz, B. (2020). Evaluating the logistics performance of OECD countries by using fuzzy AHP and ARAS-G. Eurasian Economic Review, 10(1), 27-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-019-00131-3

Zhiwen, Z., Yujun, X., Junxing, L., Limin, G., & Long, W. (2020). Supply chain logistics information collabora-tion strategy based on evolutionary game theory. IEEE Access, 8, 46102-46120. http://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2978943


Published : 2021-05-31


Kálmán, B., & Tóth, A. (2021). Links between the economy competitiveness and logistics performance in the Visegrád Group countries: Empirical evidence for the years 2007-2018. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 9(3), 169-190. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2021.090311

Botond Kálmán  kalmanbotond@student.elte.hu
Eötvös Loránd University  Hungary
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8031-8016
Arnold Tóth 
Budapest Business School  Hungary
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0860-6405




Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are asked to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) only the final version of the article, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). We advise using any of the following research society portals: