Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2016)
Advancing Research in Entrepreneurship

Other Articles

Relationships between Talent Management and Organizational Performance: The Role of Climate for Creativity

https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2016.040315

Published 2016-09-18

  • Tomasz Ingram

Tomasz Ingram
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach Wydział Ekonomii Katedra Przedsiębiorczości i Zarządzania Innowacyjnego

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this paper is to explore the role of climate for creativity in mediating relationships between talent management and organizational performance.

Research, Design & Methods: A model relating talent management, organizational performance and climate for creativity was tested using structural equation modelling Based and data from 326 large organizations in Poland. It allowed the verification of two formulated hypotheses.

Findings: Research results reveal that talent management is a three-dimensional construct (dimensions are: strategic, structural and ideological) while climate for creativity and organizational performance are both unidimensional constructs. Results indicate that climate for creativity mediates the relationships between the dimensions of talent management and organizational performance.

Implications & Recommendations: Research findings suggest that in order to enable organizations to achieve high performance through talent management it should focus on creating an appropriate climate supporting individual creativity of its employees.

Contribution & Value Added: The originality of this work lies in studying unexplored relationships between talent management policies and organizational performance with the mediating role of climate for creativity. It is the first attempt to assess these relationships on the basis of empirical data in Poland.

    

Keywords

talent management, organizational performance, climate for creativi-ty, empirical research, structural equation modelling

PDF Eber Author Statement Review1 Ingram Copywrite Ingram Copywrite

Author Biography

Tomasz Ingram

Katedra Przedsiębiorczości i Zarządzania Innowacyjnego

References

  1. Al Ariss, A., Cascio, W.F., & Paauwe, J. (2014). Talent management: Current theories and future research directions. Journal of World Business, 49(2), 173-179.
  2. Ashton, C., & Morton, L. (2005). Managing talent for competitive advantage: Taking a systemic approach to talent management. Strategic HR Review, 4(5), 28-31.
  3. Azmi, F.T. (2011). Strategic human resource management and its linkage with HRM effectiveness and organizational performance: evidence from India. International Journal of Human Re-source Management, 22(18), 3888-3912. http://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.561245
  4. Boudreau, J.W. (2013). Appreciating and "retooling" diversity in talent management conceptual models: A commentary on “The psychology of talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 286-289.
  5. Boudreau, J.W., & Ramstad, P.M. (2005). Talentship and the evolution of human resource man-agement: from professional practices to strategic talent decision science. University of Southern California, Center for Effective Organizations Working Paper. Retrieved on January 10, 2016 from http://www-marshall.usc.edu/assets/047/9842.pdf
  6. Bratnicki, M. (2001). Dylematy i pułapki współczesnego zarządzania. Katowice: Gnome.
  7. Collings, D.G., & Mellahi, K. (2009). Strategic Talent Management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 19, 304-313.
  8. Coulson-Thomas, C. (2012). Talent management and building high performance organisations. Industrial and Commercial Training, 44(7), 429-436. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.04.001
  9. Dries, N. (2013a). Talent management, from phenomenon to theory: Introduction to the Special Issue. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 267-271.
  10. Dries, N. (2013b). The psychology of talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 272-285. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.05.001
  11. Gallardo-Gallardo, E., Dries, N., & González-Cruz, T.F. (2013). What is the meaning of "talent" in the world of work? Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 290-300.
  12. Garavan, T.N. (2012). Global talent management in science-based firms: an exploratory investiga-tion of the pharmaceutical industry during the global downturn. International Journal of Hu-man Resource Management, 23(12), 2428-2449.
  13. George, J.M. (2007). Creativity in Organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 439-477.
  14. Goldsmith, M., & Carter, L. (2010). Best practices in talent management: how the world's leading corporations manage, develop, and retain top talent. San Francisco: Pfeiffer; Best Practice In-stitute.
  15. Harris, J., Craig, E., & Egan, H. (2010). How successful organizations strategically manage their analytic talent. Strategy & Leadership, 38(3), 15-22.
  16. Hunter, S.T., Bedell, K.E., & Mumford, M.D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19(1), 69-90.
  17. Iles, P., Chuai, X., & Preece, D. (2010). Talent management and HRM in multinational companies in Beijing: Definitions, differences and drivers. Journal of World Business, 45(2), 179-189. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.09.014
  18. Ingram, T. (2016a). Towards the dialectical approach to organizational talent management: Em-pirical research results. Paper presented at Australia and New Zealand International Business Academy Conference, Sydney.
  19. Ingram, T. (2016b). Zarządzanie talentami i pracownikami w dojrzałym wieku w kontekście wpływu na wyniki przedsiębiorstwa. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach.
  20. Levenson, A. (2012). Talent management: challenges of building cross-functional capability in high-performance work systems environments. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 187-204. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7941.2011.00022.x
  21. Mohrman, S.A., & Lawler, E.E. (1997). Transforming the human resource function: Introduction. Human Resource Management (1986-1998), 36(1), 157.
  22. Poole, M.S., & Van de Ven, A.H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14, 562-578.
  23. Raman, R., Chadee, D., Roxas, B., & Michailova, S. (2013). Effects of partnership quality, talent management, and global mindset on performance of offshore IT service providers in India. Journal of International Management, 19(4), 333-346.
  24. Reilly, P. (2008). Identifying the right course for talent management. Public Personnel Manage-ment, 37(4), 381-388.
  25. Rodell, J.B., & Lynch, J.W. (2016). Perceptions of employee volunteering: Is it “credited” or “stigmatized” by colleagues? Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 611-635.
  26. Rogg, K.L., Schmidt, D.B., Shull, C., & Schmitt, N. (2001). Human resource practices, organizational climate, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Management, 27(4), 431-449.
  27. Sparrow, P., Scullion, H., & Tarique, I. (Eds.). (2014). Strategic talent management: Contemporary issues in international context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved on January 10, 2016 from http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781139424585
  28. Sundaramurthy, C., & Levis, M. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Acad-emy of Management Review, 28, 397-415.
  29. Tansley, C. (2011). What do we mean by the term "talent" in talent management? Industrial and Commercial Training, 43(5), 266-274.
  30. Tansley, C., Kirk, S., & Tietze, S. (2013).The currency of talent management—A reply to “talent management and the relevance of context: Towards a pluralistic approach. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 337-340. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.08.004
  31. Tarique, I., & Schuler, R.S. (2010). Global talent management: Literature review, integrative framework, and suggestions for further research. Journal of World Business, 45(2), 122-133. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.09.019
  32. Thunnissen, M., Boselie, P., & Fruytier, B. (2013). Talent management and the relevance of context: Towards a pluralistic approach. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 326-336. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.05.004
  33. Van de Ven, A.H. (1992). Suggestions for studying strategy process: A research note. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 169-188.
  34. Van den Brink, M., Fruytier, B., & Thunnissen, M. (2013). Talent management in academia: performance systems and HRM policies: Performance systems and HRM policies. Human Re-source Management Journal, 23(2), 180-195. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2012.00196.x
  35. Yeh‐Yun Lin, C., & Liu, F. (2012). A cross-level analysis of organizational creativity climate and perceived innovation: The mediating effect of work motivation. European Journal of Innova-tion Management, 15(1), 55-76. http://doi.org/10.1108/14601061211192834

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.