Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 10 No. 3 (2022)
September 2022

Articles

The effect of research and development personnel on innovation activities of firms: Evidence from small and medium-sized enterprises from the Visegrad Group countries

https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2022.100307

Published 2022-09-30

Aleksandra Zygmunt
Opole University of Technology

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to assess whether research and development (R&D) personnel from firms, the research system, and governmental institutions contribute to innovation activities of firms from the Visegrad Group countries.

Research Design & Methods: Fixed effects panel regression with robust standard errors was used for hypothesis testing over the period 2009-2017. The data for the study was extracted from Eurostat, the European Innovation Scoreboard and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development with a particular focus on R&D personnel from firms, the research system, and governmental institutions. The empirical analysis was focused on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

Findings: The results provide evidence about significant linkage between R&D personnel from governmental institutions and innovation activities of firms from the Visegrad Group countries. The research also highlights the lack of a significant effect of R&D personnel from firms and the research system on firms’ innovation activities in the analysed former Soviet satellite economies distinguished by innovation performance below the average for the European Union.

Implications & Recommendations: Policy and practical implications that should be indicated include the necessity to further develop knowledge cooperation between governmental institutions and firms in order to reinforce innovation processes. There is also a need to enhance cooperation between the research system and firms to support SMEs from the Visegrad Group countries with highly-skilled human resources.

Contribution & Value Added: This article adds to the literature on drivers and sources of firms’ innovation activities by providing new empirical evidence on the effect of R&D personnel on innovation activities of firms from the Visegrad Group countries, which are former Soviet satellite economies with a moderate level of innovativeness and belong to peripheral countries in the European Union.

       

Keywords

R&D personnel, innovation activities of firms, the Visegrad Group countries

(PDF) Save

References

  1. Audretsch, D.B., & Belitski, M. (2020). The role of R&D and knowledge spillovers in innovation and produc-tivity. European Economic Review, 123, 103391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103391
  2. Asheim, B.T., Moodysson, J. & Tödtling, F. (2011). Constructing Regional Advantage: Towards State-of-the-Art Regional Innovation System Policies in Europe? European Planning Studies, 19:7, 1133-1139. https://10.1080/09654313.2011.573127
  3. Baptista, A., Frick, L., Holley, K., Remmik, M., Tesch, J. & Âkerlind, G. (2015) The doctorate as an original contribution to knowledge: Considering relationships between originality, creativity, and innovation. Frontline Learning Research, 55-67. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v3i3.147
  4. Bianchini, S., Llerena, P., & Martino, R. (2019). The impact of R&D subsidies under different institutional frameworks. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 40, 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.04.002
  5. Bilbao-Osorio, B., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2011). From R&D to Innovation and Economic Growth in the EU. Growth and Change. A Journal of Urban and Regional Policy, 35(40), 434-455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2004.00256.x
  6. Clausen, T.H. (2009). Do subsidies have positive impacts on R&D and innovation activities at the firm level? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 20, 239-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2009.09.004
  7. Cortinovis, N., Xiao, J., Boschma, R., & van Oort, F. (2017). Quality of government and social capital as drivers of regional diversification in Europe. Journal of Economic Geography, 17(6), 1179-1208. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbx001.
  8. D'Este, P., Rentocchini, F., & Vega Jurado, J. (2014). The role of human capital in lowering the barriers to engaging in innovation: Evidence from the Spanish innovation survey. Industry and Innovation, 21(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2014.879252
  9. Edler, J., & Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: What, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 2-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx001
  10. Eurostat (2020). Research and development personnel, by sectors of performance. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tsc00002/default/table? Lang=en on 13 September 2021
  11. European Commission (2021). SME definition. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/growth/smes/sme-definition_pl on December 18, 2021
  12. European Commission (2020a). European Innovation Scoreboard 2020. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/42981 on 21 September 2021
  13. European Commission (2020b). European Innovation Scoreboard 2020. Methodology Report. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/41861 on 21 September 2021
  14. European Commission (2019). European Innovation Scoreboard 2019. Retrieved from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d156a01b-9307-11e9-9369-01aa75ed71a1/
  15. language-en/format-PDF/source-136061387 on 21 September 2021
  16. Fitjar, R.D., Benneworth, P., & Asheim, B.T. (2019). Towards regional responsible research and innovation? Integrating RRI and RIS3 in European innovation policy. Science and Public Policy, 46(5), 772-783. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz029
  17. Frangenheim, A., Trippl, M., & Chlebna, C. (2020). Beyond the Single Path View: Interpath Dynamics in Re-gional Contexts. Economic Geography, 6:1, 31-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2019.1685378
  18. Fritsch, M., Titze, M., & Piontek, M. (2020). Identifying cooperation for innovation―a comparison of data sources. Industry and Innovation, 27:6, 630-659. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1650253
  19. Godlewska-Dzioboń, B., Klimczyk, P., & Witoń, A. (2019). Knowledge-Intensive Services Development in the EU: Forecasts for Selected Countries and Implications for Poland. Entrepreneurial Business and Econom-ics Review, 7(2), 101-118. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2019.070206
  20. Grillitsch, M., Schuber, T., & Srholec, M. (2019). Knowledge base combinations and firm growth. Research Policy, 48, 234-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.009
  21. Hardy, J., Micek, G., & Capik, P. (2011). Upgrading Local Economies in Central and Eastern Europe? The Role of Business Service Foreign Direct Investment in the Knowledge Economy, European Planning Studies, 19:9, 1581-1591. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.586180
  22. Hauser, Ch., Siller, M., Schatzer, T., Walde, J., Tappeiner, G. (2018). Measuring regional innovation: A critical inspection of the ability of single indicators to shape technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.10.019
  23. Hsiao, C (2007). Panel data analysis—advantages and challenges. TEST, 16, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-007-0046-x
  24. Huggins, R., Prokop, D. & Thompson, P. (2019). Universities and open innovation: the determinants of net-work centrality. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45, 718-757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09720-5
  25. Hunady, J., Pisar, P., Musa, H., & Musova, Z. (2017). Innovation support and economic development at the regional level: panel data evidence from Visegrad countries. Journal of International Studies, 10(3), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-3/11
  26. Isaksen, A., & Jakobsen, S-E. (2017). New path development between innovation systems and individual actors, European Planning Studies, 25(3), 355-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1268570
  27. Klewitz, J., & Hansen, E.G. (2014). Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: a systematic review, Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 57-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017
  28. Koschatzky, K., Bross, U., Stanovnik, P. (2001). Development and innovation potential in the Slovene manu-facturing industry: analysis of an industrial innovation survey. Technovation, 21(5), 311-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00050-X
  29. Lehnert, P., Pfister, C. & Backes-Gellner, U. (2020). Employment of R&D personnel after an educational sup-ply shock: Effects of the introduction of Universities of Applied Sciences in Switzerland. Labour Econom-ics, 66, 101883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2020.101883
  30. Leydesdorff, L.Wagner, C.S., Bornmann, L. (2014). The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top-10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: Competition and collaborations. Jour-nal of Informetrics, 8(3), 606-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.05.002
  31. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2021). Foreign Direct Investment Statistics: Data, Analysis and Forecasts. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/corporate/mne/statistics.htm on 21 September 2021
  32. Odei, S.A., Stejskal, J., & Prokop, V. (2020). Revisiting the Factors Driving Firms’ Innovation Per-formances: the Case of Visegrad Countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12, 1331-1344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00669-7
  33. Paliokaitė, A. (2019). An innovation policy framework for upgrading firm absorptive capacities in the context of catching-up economies. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 15(3), 103-129. https://doi.org/10.7341/20191534
  34. Raghupathi, V., Raghupathi, W. (2019). Exploring science-and-technology-led innovation: a cross-country study. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 8:5, 1-45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-018-0097-0
  35. Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do Institutions Matter for Regional Development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034-1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.748978
  36. Rodríguez-Pose, A. & Di Cataldo, M. (2015). Quality of government and innovative performance in the re-gions of Europe, Journal of Economic Geography, 15(4), 673-706, https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu023
  37. Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2014). Leveraging research, science and innovation to strengthen social and regional cohesion. Policy paper by the Research, Innovation, and Science Policy Experts, RISE. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/research_and_innovation/groups/rise/rodriguez-pose-leveraging_science.pdf on 08.03.2022
  38. Rosenbusch, N. , Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 441-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.12.002
  39. Sauermann, H., & Cohen, W.M. (2010). What Makes Them Tick? Employee Motives and Firm Innovation. Management Science, 56(12), 2134-2153. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1241
  40. Solheim, M.C.W., Boschma, R., & Herstad, S.J. (2020). Collected worker experiences and the novelty content of innovation. Research Policy, 49(1), 103856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103856
  41. Teirlinck, P., & Spithoven, A. (2013). Research collaboration and R&D outsourcing: Different R&D personnel requirements in SMEs. Technovation, 33, 142-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.11.005
  42. Thomas, E., Faccin, K., & Asheim, B.T. (2020). Universities as orchestrators of the development of regional innovation ecosystems in emerging economies. Growth and Change, 52, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12442
  43. Tijssen, RJ.W., & Winnink, J.J. (2017). Capturing ‘R&D excellence’: indicators, international statistics, and innovative universities. Scientometrics, 114, 687-699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2602-9
  44. Tijssen, RJ.W., Yegros-Yegros, A., & Winnink, J.J. (2016). University–industry R&D linkage metrics: validity and applicability in world university rankings. Scientometrics, 109, 677-696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2098-8
  45. Tödtling, F., & Grillitsch, M. (2015). Does Combinatorial Knowledge Lead to a Better Innovation Performance of Firms? European Planning Studies 23(9), 1741-1758. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1056773
  46. Wang, Y., Ellinger, A.D., & Jim Wu, Y. (2013). Entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: an empirical study of R&D personnel. Management Decision, 51(2), 248-266. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741311301803
  47. Whitacre, B.E., Meadowcroft, D., & Gallardo, R. (2019). Firm and regional economic outcomes associated with a new, broad measure of business innovation. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 31:9-10, 930-952. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2019.1630486
  48. Wielechowski, M., Cherevyk, D., Czech, K., Kotyza, P., Grzęda, Ł., & Smutka, L. (2021). Interdependence be-tween human capital determinants and economic development: K-means regional clustering approach for Czechia and Poland. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 9(4), 173-194. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2021.090411
  49. Zygmunt, A. (2020). Do Human Resources and the Research System Affect Firms’ Innovation Activities? Re-sults from Poland and the Czech Republic. Sustainability, 12(6), 2519. https://doi.org/doi:10.3390/su12062519
  50. Zygmunt, J. (2017). Enterprises’ development in peripheral regions: patterns and determinants. Problemy Zarządzania, 15, 1(65), 226-236. https://doi.org/doi:10.7172/1644-9584.65.14
  51. Żelazny, R., & Pietrucha, J. (2017). Measuring innovation and institution: the creative economy index. Equi-librium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 12(1), 43-62. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.v12i1.3

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.