Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2016)
Advancing Research in Entrepreneurship

Thematic Articles

Involving Young People in Polish and Lithuanian Social Enterprises by Fostering Entrepreneurial Skills and Abil-ities as Entrepreneurial Opportunity at University

https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2016.040310

Published 2016-09-18

  • Jolita Greblikaite
    • ,
  • Włodzimierz Sroka
    • ,
  • Neringa Gerulaitiene

Jolita Greblikaite
Aleksandras Stulginskis University

Włodzimierz Sroka
Dr. of Habilitation, Assoc. professor

Neringa Gerulaitiene
Kaunas University of Technology

Abstract

Objective: The paper aims to analyse theoretically and empirically the development of social entrepreneurship in Poland and Lithuania, emphasizing the development of appropriate skills and abilities gained at university as entrepreneurial opportunity.

Research Design & Methods: The research undertaken for the purposes of the paper is based on a literature review and empirical research partly devoted to a situational analysis of social entrepreneurship in Poland, as well as a pilot survey of target groups pertaining to the entrepreneurial skills and abilities as entrepreneurial opportunity of Lithuanian and Polish students as potential social entrepreneurs.

Findings: The main research findings imply that despite the existence of entrepreneurial opportunity as education at university, social entrepreneurship is increasingly important in Poland. Overall support is needed for the creation of social enterprises and attracting young people to them. Empirical research based on Lithuanian and Polish students’ perception of acquiring entrepreneurial skills and abilities at university can be entrepreneurial opportunity for social entrepreneurship.

Implications & Recommendations: Implementing further research in the field, as empirical this research was just a pilot one. Research can be developed by taking into account more respondents in both countries.

Contribution & Value Added: The study provides empirical evidence entrepreneurial skills and abilities gained/developed at university are a possible entrepreneurial opportunity for exploiting and creating social enterprises.


 

Keywords

social entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial opportunities, entrepre-neurial skills and abilities, young entrepreneurs

PDF Authors' statement after EBER review Authors' statement

Author Biography

Jolita Greblikaite

Assoc. professor
Institute of Business and Rural Development Management

Neringa Gerulaitiene

PhD student

References

  1. Aldrich, H., & Martinez, M. (2007). Many are Called, but Few are Chosen: An Evolutionary Perspec-tive for the Study of Entrepreneurship. In A. Cuervo, D. Ribeiro, & S. Roiq (Eds.), Entrepre-neurship: Concepts, Theory and Perspective (pp. 293-311). Berlin: Springer.
  2. Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Sourav, R. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identifica-tion and development. Journal of business Venturing, 18, 105-123.
  3. Audretsch, D.B., & Acs, Z.J. (2003). Handbook of entrepreneurship research: an interdisciplinary survey and introduction. New York: Springer.
  4. Austen-Tynda, A. (2008). Social entrepreneurship in Poland: implications for public management. Management, 12(2), 199-212.
  5. Casson, M.C. (1982). The Entrepreneur: An Economic Theory. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
  6. Casson, M.C., & Wadeson, N. (2007). The Discovery of Opportunities: Extending the Economic Theory of the Entrepreneur. Small Business Economics, 28(4), 285–300.
  7. Choi, Y.R., & Shepherd, D.A. (2004). Entrepreneurs’ Decision to Exploit Opportunities. Journal of Management, 30(3), 377-395.
  8. Choi, Y.R., Levesque, M., & Shepherd, D.A. (2008). When should entrepreneurs expedite or delay opportunity exploitation? Journal of Business Venturing, 23(3), 333-355.
  9. Ciepielewska-Kowalik, A. (2013). Trends and challenges for social enterprises in Poland. A new model of social investments and social cohesion. Paper presented at 4th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise “If Not For Profit, For What? And How?â€, July 1-4, 2013, Liege: University of Liege.
  10. Ciepielewska-Kowalik, A. (2015). Socio-economic, political and historical context of the emergence of the Social Economy in childcare in Poland (1989-2014). Looking for social inclusion and co-hesion enhancement. Retrieved on June 30, 2016 from http://www.ciriecportugal.org/
  11. uploads/9/6/4/3/9643491/ciriec2015_0259_paper.pdf
  12. Ciepielewska-Kowalik, A., Pieliński, B., Starnawska, M., & Szymańska, A. (2015). Social enterprise in Poland: institutional and historical context. ICSEM Working Papers, No. 11, Liege: The In-ternational Comparative Social Enterprise Models (ICSEM) Project.
  13. Companys, Y.E., & McMullen, J.S. (2007). Strategic Entrepreneurs at Work: The Nature, Discovery, and Exploitation of Entrepreneurial Opportunities. Small Business Economics, 28(4).
  14. Dahlqvist, J., & Wiklund, J. (2012). Measuring the market newness of new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 185-196.
  15. Davidsson, P. (2008). The entrepreneurship research challenge. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  16. Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301-331.
  17. De Jong, J.P.J. (2009). The decision to innovate: antecedents of opportunity exploitation in high tech small firms. Scales: Zoetermeer.
  18. Dimov, D. (2007). Beyond the single-person, single-insight attribution in understanding entrepre-neurial opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(5), 713-731.
  19. Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417–436.
  20. Drayton, W. (2002). The citizen sector: becoming as entrepreneurial and competitive as business. California Management Review, 44(3), 120-132.
  21. Dutta, D.K., & Crossan, M.M. (2005). The Nature of Entrepreneurial Opportunities: Understanding the Process Using the 4I Organizational Learning Framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 425-449.
  22. Eckhardt, J.T., & Shane, S.A. (2003). Opportunities and Entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 333-349.
  23. European Commission (2014). A map of social enterprises and their eco-systems in Europe. Coun-try Report: Poland. Brussels: European Commission.
  24. Fuentes, M., Arroyo, M.R., & Perez, V.F. (2010). Prior Knowledge and Social Networks in the Ex-ploitation of Entrepreneurial Opportunities. International Entrepreneurship Journal, 6, 481-501.
  25. Greblikaite, J., Sroka, W., & Grants, J. (2015). Development of social entrepreneurship in European Union: policy and situation of Lithuania and Poland. Transformations in Business & Econo-mics, 14(2B) (35B), 376-396.
  26. Hausner, J. (Ed.) (2008). Przedsiębiorstwa społeczne w Polsce. Teoria i praktyka. Kraków: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie, Małopolska Szkoła Administracji Publicznej.
  27. Hayek, F. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35(4), 519-530.
  28. Herbst, J. (2008). Polski trzeci sektor w świetle teorii przedsiębiorstwa społecznego. In J. Dąbrow-ska (red.), Od trzeciego sektora do przedsiębiorczości społecznej – wyniki badań ekonomii społecznej w Polsce (pp. 125-142). Warszawa: Stowarzyszenie Klon/Jawor.
  29. Holcombe, R.G. (2003). The origins of entrepreneurial opportunities. The Review of Austrian Eco-nomics, 16(1), 25-43.
  30. Jesensky, D. (2013). Creating entrepreneurial opportunities: Interpretative Research about Role of POP Advertising Displays in Customer Purchase Decision Making. Jyvaskyla: University Library of Jyvaskyla.
  31. Korosec, R., & Berman, E. (2006). Municipal support for social entrepreneurship. Public Admin-istration Review, 66(3), 446-462.
  32. Kożuch, A., & Žukovskis, J. (2014). Effective managing of social co-operatives as a form of social enterprise: the case of Poland. International Journal of Contemporary Management, 134(4), 83-96.
  33. Kurleto, M. (2013). Possibility of using in Poland contemporary solutions concerning philanthropy and social entrepreneurship adopted in the U.S. Global Management Journal, 5(1-2), 28-35.
  34. Kusa, R. (2012). Social entrepreneurship in Poland. A preliminary comparison of research ap-proaches. 1st Virtual International Conference on Advanced Research in Scientific Fields (AR-SA-2012), 3-7 December, 94-97.
  35. LeÅ›, E. (2004). Co-operatives in Poland: from state-controlled institutions to new trends in co-operative development. In C. Borzaga, & R. Spear (Eds.), Trends and challenges for coopera-tives and social enterprises in developed and transition countries (pp. 185-196). Trento: Edizioni 31.
  36. LeÅ›, E., Ciepielewska-Kowalik, A. (2014). Social economy and social enterprises in Poland: trends, challenges and obstacles. Paper presented at 54th ERSA Congress, St. Petersburg, August 26-29.
  37. Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41, 36-44.
  38. Peredo, M., & McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: a critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41, 56-65.
  39. Plummer, L.A., Haynie, J.M., Godesiabois, J. (2007). An Essay on the Origins of Entrepreneurial opportunity. Small Business Economics, 28, 363-379.
  40. Praszkier, R., Zabłocka-Bursa, A., & Jozwik, E. (2014). Social enterprise, social innovation and social entrepreneurship in Poland. EFESEIIS National Report, Warsaw: University of Warsaw.
  41. Roure, C.L., González, N., Nieto, M., García, C., & Solís, V. (2007). Influencia de la existencia y el descubrimiento de oportunidades sobre la actividad emprendedora. Revista de Empresa: La Fuente de Ideas del Ejecutivo, 20, 66–77.
  42. Schumpeter, J. (1934). Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  43. Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448-469.
  44. Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: the individual-opportunity nexus. Chelten-ham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  45. Shane, S., & Venkatarman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.
  46. Shepherd, D.A., & DeTienne, D.R. (2005). Prior knowledge, potential financial reward, and oppor-tunity identification. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 91–112.
  47. Short, J.C., Ketchen, D.J., Shook, C.L., & Ireland, R.D. (2010). The Concept of ''Opportunity'' in En-trepreneurship Research: Past Accomplishments and Future Challenges. Journal of Manage-ment, 36(40), 40-62.
  48. Smith, B.R., Matthews, C.H., & Schenkel, M.T. (2009). Differences in entrepreneurial opportunities: the role of tacitness and codification in opportunity identification. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(1), 38-57.
  49. Soderqvist, A. (2011). Opportunity exploration and exploitation in international new ventures: a study of relationships’ involvement in early entrepreneurial and internationalization events. Helsinki: Edita Prima.
  50. Starnawska, M. (2011). Resourcing in social enterprise – content analysis of ‘good practices’ pro-filed in ‘Atlas of social economy’ in Poland. Retrieved on April 30, 2016 from http://emes.net/content/uploads/publications/resourcing-in-social-enterprise-content-analy sis-of-good-practices-profiled-in-atlas-of-social-economy-in-poland/5ESCP-02-Resourcing_in_ social_enterprise_content_analysi s_Marzena_Starnawska.pdf
  51. Thompson, T.L. (2002). The world of the social entrepreneur. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(5), 412-431.
  52. Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2009). The extent and nature of opportunity identifica-tion by experienced entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 99–115.
  53. Von Hippel, E. (1994). ‘Sticky information’ and the locus of problem solving: implications for inno-vation. Management Science, 40(4), 429–439.
  54. Zahra, S.A., Korri, J.S., & Yu, J. (2005). Cognition and international entrepreneurship: implications for research on international opportunity recognition and exploitation. International Business Review, 14(2), 129-146.
  55. Zahra, S.A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubam, D.O., & Shulman, J.M. (2009). A typology of social entrepre-neurs. Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 519-532.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.