Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Exploring entrepreneurial capabilities and firm innovativeness to leverage financial technology start-up business performance

Abstract

Objective: This article examines the role of entrepreneurial capabilities and firm innovativeness in driving the business performance of financial technology (fintech) start-ups. By cultivating entrepreneurial orientation, innovation capacity, and knowledge creation, firms can enhance their competitive edge, adapt to market shifts, and achieve sustainable performance.

Research Design & Methods: We conducted a quantitative study using a self-administered questionnaire and partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) to test our hypotheses. The sample included the management teams of 144 Indonesian fintech start-ups, each in operation for at least three years.

Findings: Our analysis reveals that both entrepreneurial capabilities and firm innovativeness significantly and positively impact the business performance of fintech start-ups. Furthermore, firm innovativeness mediates the relationship between entrepreneurial capabilities and business performance. Specifically, entrepreneurial capabilities and firm innovativeness collectively explain 58.3% of the variance in business performance, while entrepreneurial capabilities account for 48% of the variation in firm innovativeness.

Implications & Recommendations: This study demonstrates that firms with robust entrepreneurial capabilities are better equipped to identify and seize opportunities, leading to higher innovation and, consequently, stronger business performance. These findings suggest that fintech firms can enhance performance through increased market share, greater profitability from new products, and more efficient operations. We recommend that managers and entrepreneurs in the fintech sector use these insights to make informed decisions regarding resource allocation, strategic planning, and organisational design. Policymakers can also leverage these insights to develop programs that promote entrepreneurial capabilities and innovation, foster economic growth and boost competitiveness within the sector.

Contribution & Value Added: Our study adds valuable insights to the dynamic and competitive fintech sector by demonstrating that cultivating entrepreneurial capabilities and fostering innovation within fintech firms can significantly enhance their performance outcomes. This research provides actionable guidance for both industry practitioners and policymakers seeking to drive growth and competitiveness in the fintech ecosystem.

Keywords

entrepreneurial capability, firm innovativeness, business performance, financial technology, start-up companies

(PDF) Save

Author Biography

Anna Sardiana

PhD in Industrial Business Administration, at KMITL Business School, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand. Her research interests include Entrepreneurship, Digital Business, Strategic Management, Consumer Behaviour, Financial Technology, and related to Islamic Economic and Finance.

Sudaporn Sawmong

Associate Professor at KMITL Business School, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand. She was also the former dean of the faculty. Her research interests include entrepreneurship, marketing, consumer behaviour, strategic management, and digital marketing.


References

  1. Abbas, J., Banu, R., Muscat College, Sultanate of Oman, Ugheoke, S., & Muscat College, Sultanate of Oman. (2023). Literature Study on Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firms Performance: An Assessment and Suggestions for Future Research. International Journal of Research in Entrepreneurship & Business Studies, 4(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.47259/ijrebs.411
  2. Abbas, J., Raza, S., Nurunnabi, M., Minai, M.S., & Bano, S. (2019). The Impact of Entrepreneurial Business Networks on Firms’ Performance Through a Mediating Role of Dynamic Capabilities. Sustainability, 11(11), 3006. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113006
  3. Abu-Rumman, A., Al Shraah, A., Al-Madi, F., & Alfalah, T. (2021). Entrepreneurial networks, entrepreneurial orientation, and performance of small and medium enterprises: Are dynamic capabilities the missing link?. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-021-00170-8
  4. Adinata, A., Sholahuddin, M., Kuswati, R., & Wiyadi. (2023). The Influence of Innovation Capability and Entrepreneurship Capability on E-Marketing Performance, Mediated by Competitive Advantage, to Enhance Culinary SMEs in Ponorogo. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 5(12), 130-139. https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2023.5.12.15
  5. Agus, A., Limakrisna, N., & Muharram, H. (2023). Increasing the business performance of food processing msmes in cirebon by creating competitive advantages through entrepreneurship orientation, dynamic capabilities, and market orientation. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 53-70. https://doi.org/10.56943/joe.v2i4.437
  6. Ali, E., Liu, J., Faiz, A., Siraj, A., & Mohsin, R. (2022). Exploring the Nexus between Supply Chain Integration, Integrative Value-Creation, and Firm’s Performance: Mediating Roles of Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy and Innovation Capability. International Journal of Management Research and Emerging Sciences, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.56536/ijmres.v12i2.211
  7. Al-Mamary, Y.H., & Alshallaqi, M. (2022). Impact of autonomy, innovativeness, risk-taking, proactiveness, and competitive aggressiveness on students’ intention to start a new venture. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100239
  8. Al-Mannaei, M., Al-Jayyousi, O., Mahmood, A., Dornberger, U., & Al-Jayousi, N. (2023). Evaluating innovation performance for financial technology within the national innovation system: A case study of the Kingdom of Bahrain. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(2), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2023.110210
  9. Anees-ur-Rehman, M., Wong, H.Y., Sultan, P., & Merrilees, B. (2018). How brand-oriented strategy affects the financial performance of B2B SMEs. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 33(3), 303-315. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-10-2016-0237
  10. Ariasih, Made Putri., Komang Endrawan Sumadi Putra, & I Nengah Suarmanayasa. (2024). Entrepreneurial Leadership Impact on MSME Women’s Business Perfomance In Denpasar City. Jurnal Ekonomi, 29(1), 60-77. https://doi.org/10.24912/je.v29i1.2013
  11. Aslam, M., Shafi, I., Ahmad, J., Alvarez, R.M., Miró, Y., Flores, E.S., & Ashraf, I. (2022). An Analytical Framework for Innovation Determinants and Their Impact on Business Performance. Sustainability, 15(1), 458. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010458
  12. Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  13. Bibi, S., Khan, A., Qian, H., Garavelli, A.C., Natalicchio, A., & Capolupo, P. (2020). Innovative Climate, a Determinant of Competitiveness and Business Performance in Chinese Law Firms: The Role of Firm Size and Age. Sustainability, 12(12), 4948. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124948
  14. Bodlaj, M., & Čater, B. (2019). The Impact of Environmental Turbulence on the Perceived Importance of Innovation and Innovativeness in SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(sup2), 417-435. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12482
  15. Buccieri, D., Javalgi, R.G., & Cavusgil, E. (2020). International new venture performance: Role of international entrepreneurial culture, ambidextrous innovation, and dynamic marketing capabilities. International Business Review, 29(2), 101639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101639
  16. Cheung, G.W., Cooper-Thomas, H.D., Lau, R.S., & Wang, L.C. (2024). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(2), 745-783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y
  17. Ciampi, F., Demi, S., Magrini, A., Marzi, G., & Papa, A. (2021). Exploring the impact of big data analytics capabilities on business model innovation: The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Research, 123, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.023
  18. Creamer, G.G. (2022). Financial Data and Trend Prediction. In L.A. Schintler & C.L. McNeely (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Big Data (pp. 479-482). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32010-6_95
  19. Crick, J.M., Karami, M., & Crick, D. (2021). The impact of the interaction between an entrepreneurial marketing orientation and coopetition on business performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 27(6), 1423-1447. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-12-2020-0871
  20. Dias, C., Gouveia Rodrigues, R., & Ferreira, J.J. (2021). Small agricultural businesses’ performance—What is the role of dynamic capabilities, entrepreneurial orientation, and environmental sustainability commitment?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 1898-1912. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2723
  21. Domi, S., Keco, R., Capelleras, J.-L., & Mehmeti, G. (2019). Effects of innovativeness and innovation behavior on tourism SMEs performance: The case of Albania. Economics & Sociology, 12(3), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-3/5
  22. Dong, B. (2023). How Transformational Leadership Affects Firm Innovation Performance—A Perspective Based on Environmental Dynamism and Business Model Innovation. Journal of Chinese Human Resources Management, 14(2), 38-50. https://doi.org/10.47297/wspchrmWSP2040-800503.20231402
  23. Fan, M., Qalati, S.A., Khan, M.A.S., Shah, S.M.M., Ramzan, M., & Khan, R.S. (2021). Effects of entrepreneurial orientation on social media adoption and SME performance: The moderating role of innovation capabilities. PLOS ONE, 16(4), e0247320. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247320
  24. Faroque, A.R., Mostafiz, M.I., Faruq, M.O., & Bashar, M.F.B. (2021). Revisiting entrepreneurial capabilities and export market orientation: A multi-scale investigation in an emerging economy. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(3), 556-579. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-08-2019-0644
  25. Fegada, A., & Veres, Z. (2024a). The Significance of Innovation Orientation in Firm Performance: Technological Capabilities as A Moderating Role. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 20(10), 16. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2024.v20n10p16
  26. Fegada, A., & Veres, Z. (2024b). The Significance of Innovation Orientation in Firm Performance: Technological Capabilities as A Moderating Role. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 20(10), 16. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2024.v20n10p16
  27. Ferreira, J., Coelho, A., & Moutinho, L. (2020a). Dynamic capabilities, creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and firm performance: The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Technovation, 92-93, 102061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.11.004
  28. Ferreira, J., Coelho, A., & Moutinho, L. (2020b). Dynamic capabilities, creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and firm performance: The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Technovation, 92-93, 102061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.11.004
  29. Foltz, C.B., & Foltz, L. (2020). Mobile users’ information privacy concerns instrument and IoT. Information & Computer Security, 28(3), 359-371. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-07-2019-0090
  30. Garousi Mokhtarzadedeh, N., Jafarpanah, I., & Zamani Babgohari, A. (2022). Knowledge management capability, entrepreneurial creativity, entrepreneurial intensity and firm performance: The mediating role of ambidexterity. British Food Journal, 124(7), 2179-2208. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-08-2021-0942
  31. Groza, M.D., Zmich, L.J., & Rajabi, R. (2021). Organizational innovativeness and firm performance: Does sales management matter?. Industrial Marketing Management, 97, 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.06.007
  32. Han, W., Zhou, Y., & Lu, R. (2022). Strategic orientation, business model innovation and corporate performance—Evidence from construction industry. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 971654. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971654
  33. Henry, G.T. (2009). Practical sampling. The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, 2, 77-105.
  34. Hoang, C.C., & Ngoc, B.H. (2019). The Relationship between Innovation Capability and Firm’s Performance in Electronic Companies, Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(3), 295-304. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2019.VOL6.NO3.295
  35. Hoang, G., Nguyen, H., Luu, T.T., & Nguyen, T.T. (2023). Linking entrepreneurial leadership and innovation performance in hospitality firms: The roles of innovation strategy and knowledge acquisition. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 33(4), 511-536. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-09-2022-0203
  36. Hor, S.C. (Timothy), Chang, A., Torres de Oliveira, R., & Davidsson, P. (2021). From the theories of financial resource acquisition to a theory for acquiring financial resources—How should digital ventures raise equity capital beyond seed funding. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 16, e00278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2021.e00278
  37. Hurtado-Palomino, A., De la Gala-Velásquez, B., & Ccorisapra-Quintana, J. (2022). The interactive effect of innovation capability and potential absorptive capacity on innovation performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100259
  38. Hwang, W.-S., Choi, H., & Shin, J. (2020). A mediating role of innovation capability between entrepreneurial competencies and competitive advantage. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1632430
  39. Ingram, T., & Kraśnicka, T. (2023). The interplay of dynamic capabilities and innovation output in family and non-family companies: The moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(2), 63-86. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2023.110203
  40. Jiménez-Barrionuevo, M. a M., Molina, L.M., & García-Morales, V.J. (2019). Combined Influence of Absorptive Capacity and Corporate Entrepreneurship on Performance. Sustainability, 11(11), 3034. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113034
  41. Kafetzopoulos, D., Psomas, E., & Skalkos, D. (2019). Innovation dimensions and business performance under environmental uncertainty. European Journal of Innovation Management, 23(5), 856-876. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2019-0197
  42. Khalid, S. (2019). Explorative and exploitative strategies and export performance: The moderating effects of entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 22(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRME-01-2018-0004
  43. Khan, M.A., Zubair, S.S., Rathore, K., Ijaz, M., Khalil, S., & Khalil, M. (2021). Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation Dimensions on Performance of Small Enterprises: Do Entrepreneurial Competencies Matter?. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1943241. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1943241
  44. Kimjeon, J., & Davidsson, P. (2022). External Enablers of Entrepreneurship: A Review and Agenda for Accumulation of Strategically Actionable Knowledge. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(3), 643-687. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211010673
  45. Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
  46. Kwoba, T.B., & Ebewo, P.E. (2022). A Critical Investigation of Factors Influencing Ugandan Family-Owned Manufacturing Businesses’ Performance. Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship Research, 3(2), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.34001/jmer.2022.12.03.2-29
  47. Li, C., Makhdoom, H.U.R., & Asim, S. (2020). Impact of Entrepreneurial Leadership on Innovative Work Behavior: Examining Mediation and Moderation Mechanisms. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 13, 105-118. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S236876
  48. Ma, Y. (2022). The Development of Internet Finance under the Background of Sharing Economy. Mobile Information Systems, 2022, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7298291
  49. Maina, K.J., Lawrence, W.K., & Kyalo, T.N. (2023). Relationship between process innovation, entrepreneurial passion and performance of pharmaceutical manufacturing firms in Kenya. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 12(6), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i6.2862
  50. Makhloufi, L., Laghouag, A.A., Ali Sahli, A., & Belaid, F. (2021a). Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Innovation Capability: The Mediating Role of Absorptive Capability and Organizational Learning Capabilities. Sustainability, 13(10), 5399. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105399
  51. Makhloufi, L., Laghouag, A.A., Ali Sahli, A., & Belaid, F. (2021b). Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Innovation Capability: The Mediating Role of Absorptive Capability and Organizational Learning Capabilities. Sustainability, 13(10), 5399. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105399
  52. Mbore, B.K. (2021). Effect of entrepreneurship education on innovation capability of technical and vocational and education training (TVET) graduates in Kenya. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 10(3), 490-500. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i3.1151
  53. Mehrabi, H., Coviello, N., & Ranaweera, C. (2019). Ambidextrous marketing capabilities and performance: How and when entrepreneurial orientation makes a difference. Industrial Marketing Management, 77, 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.11.014
  54. Mojica-Carrillo, E.P., Maldonado-Guzmán, G., Pinzón-Castro, S.Y., & Riaño-Castillo, A.L. (2021). Effects of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Performance and Growth: Are Microenterprises and Small Firms Equal?. Advances in Management and Applied Economics, 19-37. https://doi.org/10.47260//amae/1142
  55. Monteiro, A.P., Soares, A.M., & Rua, O.L. (2019). Linking intangible resources and entrepreneurial orientation to export performance: The mediating effect of dynamic capabilities. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(3), 179-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.04.001
  56. Mostafiz, M.I., Sambasivan, M., & Goh, S.K. (2021a). The performance of export manufacturing firms: Roles of international entrepreneurial capability and international opportunity recognition. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(8), 1813-1839. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-09-2019-0732
  57. Mostafiz, M.I., Sambasivan, M., & Goh, S.K. (2021b). The performance of export manufacturing firms: Roles of international entrepreneurial capability and international opportunity recognition. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(8), 1813-1839. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-09-2019-0732
  58. Nguyen, H.T.N., Han, J.W., & Pham, H.C. (2024). Joint effect of entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities on firm performance: An empirical investigation among ICT-SMEs. Baltic Journal of Management, 19(1), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-03-2023-0102
  59. Niyawanont, N. (2023). The influence of start-up entrepreneurship and disruptive business model on firm performance. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(1), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2023.110103
  60. OJK. (2023). OJK International Information Hub | Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Retrieved from https://www.ojk.go.id/iru/dataandstatistics/detaildataandstatistics/10116/fintech-industry-assessment-april-2023 on May 1, 2024.
  61. Olabode, O.E., Boso, N., Hultman, M., & Leonidou, C.N. (2022). Big data analytics capability and market performance: The roles of disruptive business models and competitive intensity. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1218-1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.042
  62. Omar, N.A., Md Aris, H., & Nazri, M.A. (2016). The Effect of Entrepreneurial Orientation, Innovation Capability and Knowledge Creation on Firm Performance: A Perspective on Small Scale Entrepreneurs. Jurnal Pengurusan, 48, 187-200. https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2016-48-15
  63. Palmié, M., Wincent, J., Parida, V., & Caglar, U. (2020). The evolution of the financial technology ecosystem: An introduction and agenda for future research on disruptive innovations in ecosystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119779
  64. Park, B.I., & Xiao, S. (Simon). (2020). Is exploring dynamic capabilities important for the performance of emerging market firms? The moderating effects of entrepreneurial orientation and environmental dynamism. International Studies of Management & Organization, 50(1), 57-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2019.1703378
  65. Pennetta, S., Anglani, F., & Mathews, S. (2024). Navigating through entrepreneurial skills, competencies and capabilities: A systematic literature review and the development of the entrepreneurial ability model. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 16(4), 1144-1182. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-09-2022-0257
  66. Phong, V.T., & Tam, V.T. (2024). The Impact of Dynamic Capabilities on Performance of Small and Medium Tourism Businesses: A Study for the South-Central Coast Region, Vietnam. Open Journal of Business and Management, 12(01), 444-471. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2024.121028
  67. Prasetyo, E. (2021). The effects of entrepreneurial orientation and business model innovation towards company performance by observing the factor of formalization and the information technology capability. IDEAS: Journal of Management & Technology, 1(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.33021/ideas.v1i1.1703
  68. Prijadi, R., Santoso, A.S., Balqiah, T.E., Jung, H., Desiana, P.M., & Wulandari, P. (2024). Enhancing resilience in digital multi-sided platform start-ups: An exploration of entrepreneurial logic and open innovation strategies. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 12(1), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2024.120103
  69. Pulka, B.M., Ramli, A., & Mohamad, A. (2021). Entrepreneurial competencies, entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurial network, government business support and SMEs performance. The moderating role of the external environment. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 28(4), 586-618. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-12-2018-0390
  70. Putniņš, T.J., & Sauka, A. (2020). Why does entrepreneurial orientation affect company performance?. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 14(4), 711-735. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1325
  71. Rochiyati, M., Herning, I., & Jati, K. (2022). Information Accessibility and Market Responsiveness: The Mediating Relational Capability to Enhance Business Performance. Studies in Business and Economics, 17(1), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2022-0003
  72. Sandvik, I.L., & Sandvik, K. (2003). The impact of market orientation on product innovativeness and business performance. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20(4), 355-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.02.002
  73. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., & Hair, J.F. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, & A. Vomberg (Eds.), Handbook of Market Research (pp. 587-632). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15
  74. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (Seventh edition). John Wiley & Sons.
  75. Shashi, Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Singh, R. (2019). The impact of leanness and innovativeness on environmental and financial performance: Insights from Indian SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 212, 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.02.011
  76. Sijabat, E.A.S., Nimran, U., Utami, H.N., & Prasetya, A. (2021). The Effects of Dynamic Capabilities, Entrepreneurial Creativity and Ambidextrous Innovation on Firm’s Competitiveness. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 711-721. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2021.VOL8.NO1.711
  77. Silva, D.S., Ghezzi, A., Aguiar, R.B. de, Cortimiglia, M.N., & ten Caten, C.S. (2021). Lean startup for opportunity exploitation: Adoption constraints and strategies in technology new ventures. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 27(4), 944-969. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2020-0030
  78. Simpson, J.J., & Sariol, M. (2022). Uncertainty, entrepreneurial orientation, and the pursuit of M&A: Managing the unpredictable. Journal of Business Research, 142, 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.006
  79. Singh, R., Charan, P., & Chattopadhyay, M. (2022). Effect of relational capability on dynamic capability: Exploring the role of competitive intensity and environmental uncertainty. Journal of Management & Organization, 28(3), 659-680. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2022.27
  80. Strychalska-Rudzewicz, A., & Rudzewicz, A. (2021). The Impact of Organizational Innovativeness on Firm Performance in Poland: The Moderating Role of Innovation Culture. European Research Studies Journal, xxiv(Special Issue 3), 130-148. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/2419
  81. Wales, W.J., Covin, J.G., Schüler, J., & Baum, M. (2023). Entrepreneurial orientation as a theory of new value creation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 48(5), 1752-1772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-023-10021-1
  82. Wulandari, S. (2021). Designing an Assessment Model for Entrepreneurial Growth Using a Hybrid Method: 4th International Conference on Sustainable Innovation 2020-Accounting and Management (ICoSIAMS 2020), Yogyakarta, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.210121.060
  83. Xiao, S. (Simon), Lew, Y.K., & Park, B.I. (2021). International new product development performance, entrepreneurial capability, and network in high-tech ventures. Journal of Business Research, 124, 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.048
  84. Xue, S.-J., Hou, J., & Gao, P.-B. (2019). Business Model Innovation and Firm Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Management Science and Management Innovation (MSMI 2019). Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Management Science and Management Innovation (MSMI 2019), Changsha, China. https://doi.org/10.2991/msmi-19.2019.46
  85. Yang, S.-Y., & Tsai, K.-H. (2019). Lifting the veil on the link between absorptive capacity and innovation: The roles of cross-functional integration and customer orientation. Industrial Marketing Management, 82, 117-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.02.006
  86. Żur, A., & Wałęga, A. (2023). Internationalization and innovation orientation as factors of employee learning and development adaptation during Covid-19: Evidence from Polish SMEs. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(1), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2023.110104

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.