Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 5 No. 4 (2017)
International Competitiveness

Thematic Articles

Competitiveness, Technology Licensing, and Ease of Paying Taxes: A 30-Country Study

https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050401

Published 2017-12-29

Michael Troilo
The University of Tulsa

Michał Zdziarski
Faculty of Management, University of Warsaw

J. Markham Collins
The University of Tulsa

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this article is to explore the impact of a regulatory constraint: the ease of paying taxes, on the likelihood of technology licensing and the subsequent impact on the sales of firms acquiring such licences across 30 countries.

Research Design & Methods: In a comparative, longitudinal study design we apply random effects panel logit, and random-effects GLS regression models. The World Bank Enterprise Surveys panel data for Central Europe for 2008 to 2013 is the source data for the analysis. Surveys of firms from 30 countries in Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia constitute the panel.

Findings: Increasing regulatory burden in the form of tax compliance reduces the likelihood of technology licensing. Technology licensing has only modest effects on sales. Foreign ownership of firms increases both the likelihood of technology licensing and revenues.

Implications & Recommendations: All manner of political entities, from towns to entire nations, revise their tax policies to woo investment. Our current analysis of the marginal effects suggests that the impact of these improvements is underwhelming. Attracting foreign ownership is recommended to increase technology licensing, sales and competitiveness.

Contribution & Value Added: While tax holidays are a common device to woo investment, the interaction of tax regimes with technology licensing, specifically the regulatory burden of preparing and paying taxes, is scarcely studied. It is a gap we strive to fill in this manuscript.

    

Keywords

competitiveness, technology transfer, licensing, ease of paying taxes, stages of economic development, international business

PDF

Author Biography

Michael Troilo

Dr Mike Troilo is Wellspring Associate Professor of International Business, Collins College of Business School of Finance, Operations Management and International Business at University of Tulsa, USA.. He received a Ph.D. from University of Michigan , M.B.A.and M.A. from University of Virginia , and B.B.A. from College of William and Mary.  

Correspondence to: Prof. Mike Troilo, University of Tulsa, Collins College of Business , The University of Tulsa, 800 South Tucker Drive, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74104, USA, e-mail: mike-troilo@utulsa.edu

Michał Zdziarski

Dr Michał Zdziarski is Assistant Professor of Strategic Management and International Business at Faculty of Management, University of Warsaw. He received Ph.D. in Managerial Economics, MA in American Studies and MA in Business Finance at University of Warsaw.

Correspondence to: Dr. Michał‚ Zdziarski, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, ul. Szturmowa 1/3, 02-678 Warsaw, Poland, e-mail: mzdziarski@wz.uw.edu.pl

J. Markham Collins

Dr. J. Markham Collins is the Bartlett Foundation Professor of Business Finance, Coordinator of International Business Programs, and faculty director of Friends of Finance. Mark received a Ph.D. in Economics, with specialization in finance, from the University of Oklahoma, and his M.A. and B.A. degrees in Economics from the University of Houston.

Correspondence to Prof. J. Markham Collins, University of Tulsa, Collins College of Business , The University of Tulsa, 800 South Tucker Drive, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74104, USA, e-mail: mark-collins@utulsa.edu 

References

  1. Ajitabh, A., & Momaya, K.S. (2004). Competitiveness of firms: review of theory, frameworks and models. Singapore Management Review, 26(1), 45-61.
  2. Arulampalam, W. (1996). A note on estimated coefficients in random-effects probit models. University of Warwick working paper. Retrieved on May 5, 2016 from http://homepages.warwick.ac.uk/staff/Wiji.Arulampalam/papers/renote5.pdf
  3. Aulakh, P.S., Jiang, M.S., & Pan, Y. (2010). International technology licensing: Monopoly rents, transaction costs and exclusive rights. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4), 587-605, doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.19
  4. Baltagi, B.H., & Wu, P.X. (2009). Unequally Spaced Panel Data Regressions with AR(1) Disturbances. Econometric Theory, 15(6), 814-823. Retrieved on May 5, 2016 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3533276
  5. Baumol, W.J. (1972). On taxation and the control of externalities. The American Economic Review, 62(3), 307-322.
  6. Bowen, H., & De Clercq, D. (2008). Institutional context and the allocation of entrepreneurial effort. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 747-767. Retrieved on May 5, 2016 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25483297
  7. Browne, C., Corrigan, G., Crotti, R., Di Battista, A., Drzeniek Hanouz, M., Galvan, C., & Sala-i-Martín, X. (2016). World Economic Forum. Retrieved on May 2, 2016 from http://reports.weforum. org/global-competitiveness-report-2015-2016/what-competitiveness-is-and-why-it-matters/
  8. Buckley, P. (Ed.) (2004). What is international business?. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  9. Center, I.W. (2016, May 30). Methodology. Retrieved on July 2, 2016 from http://www.imd.org/wcc/research-methodology/
  10. Chen, S.F. (2005). Extending internalization theory: A new perspective on international technology transfer and its generalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2), 231-245. Retrieved on March 5, 2016 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25483277
  11. Collins, J.M., & Troilo, M.L. (2015). National factor effects on firm competitiveness and innovation. Competitiveness Review, 25(4), 392-409. doi.org/10.1108/CR-02-2015-0009
  12. Czakó, E. (2003). Have competitiveness research projects brought a system paradigm shift?. Society and Economy, 25(3), 337-349.
  13. Damijan, J., Jaklič, A., & Rojec, M. (2006) Do External Knowledge Spillovers Induce Firms Innovations? Evidence from Slovenia. In A.T. Tavares & A. Teixeira (Eds.), Multinationals, Clusters and Innovation. Does Public Policy Matter? (pp. 27-47). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  14. Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Love, I., & Maksimovic, V., (2006). Business environment and the incorporation decision. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30(11), 2967-2993. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.05.007
  15. Dess, G., Lumpkin, G.T., & Covin, J. (1997). Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: Tests of contingency and configuration models. Strategic Management Journal, 8(3), 259-277.
  16. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 1-37. doi.org/10.1162/003355302753399436
  17. Dunning, J. (1981). International Production and The Multinational Enterprise. London: George Allen & Unwin.
  18. Eggertsson, T. (2009). Knowledge and the Theory of Institutional Change. Journal of Institutional Economics, 5(2), 137-150. doi.org/10.1017/S1744137409001271
  19. Fagerberg, J. (1988). International competitiveness. The Economic Journal, 98(391), 355-374. Retrieved on March 5, 2016 from http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:98:y:1988:i:391:p:355-74
  20. Fan, J.P., Gillan, S.L., & Yu, X. (2013). Property rights, R&D spillovers, and corporate accounting transparency in China. Emerging Markets Review, 15, 34-56. doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2012.03.001
  21. Guo, B. (2008). Technology acquisition channels and industry performance: An industry-level analysis of Chinese large and medium-size manufacturing enterprises. Research Policy, 37, 194-209.
  22. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K.G. (2010). Winning in Emerging Markets: A Road Map for Strategy and Execution. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Business Press.
  23. Klapper, L., Laeven, L., & Rajan, R. (2006). Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics, 82(4), 591-629. doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.09.006
  24. Krugman, P. (1996). Pop Internationalism. New York: The MIT Press.
  25. Lall, S. (2001). Competitiveness indices and developing countries: an economic evaluation of the global competitiveness report. World Development, 29(9), 1501-1525. doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00051-1
  26. Levie, J., & Autio, E. (2011). Regulatory burden, rule of law, and entry of strategic entrepreneurs: an international panel study. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1392-1419. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.01006.x
  27. Lopez, R.A. (2008). Foreign technology licensing, productivity, and spillovers. World Development, 36(4), 560-574. doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.04.016
  28. McGrattan, E.R. (1994). The macroeconomic effects of distortionary taxation. Journal of Monetary Economics, 33(3), 573-601.
  29. Meyer, K.E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S.K., & Peng, M.W. (2009). Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1), 61-80.
  30. Moreno, A.M. (2015). Regulation, innovation, and entrepreneurship: A review of the literature. George Washington University Regulatory Studies Center Working Paper. Retrieved on March 5, 2016 from https://regulatorystudies.columbian.gwu.edu/regulation-innovation-entrepreneurship-review-literature
  31. Mottner, S., & Johnson, J.P. (2000). Motivations and risks in international licensing: A review and implications for licensing to transitional and emerging economies. Journal of World Business, 35(2), 171-188. doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9516(00)00031-6
  32. North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  33. Peng, M.W., Wang, D.Y., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 920-936.
  34. Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, March-April, 73-93.
  35. Porter, M. (2005). Building the microeconomic foundations of prosperity: Findings from the business competitiveness index. World Competitiveness Report. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
  36. Puślecki, Ł. (2010). Wpływ współpracy technologicznej krajów rozwiniętych gospodarczo na ich konkurencyjność międzynarodową. Toruń: Grado.
  37. Seven, U., & Coskun Y. (2016). Does financial development reduce income inequality and poverty?
  38. Evidence from emerging countries. Emerging Markets Review, 26(C), 34-63. Retrieved on March 5, 2016 from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2757024
  39. Scott, B.R. (1985). U. S. Competitiveness in the World Economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  40. Solow, R.M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 312-320. Retrieved on March 5, 2016 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1926047
  41. Troilo, M. (2011). Legal institutions and high-growth aspiration entrepreneurship. Economic Systems, 35(2), 158-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2010.08.001
  42. Troilo, M. (2014). Collaboration, product innovation, and sales: An empirical study of Chinese firms. Journal of Technology Management in China, 9(1), 37-55.
  43. Woolridge, J.M. (2013). Nonlinear models: Correlated random-effects panel data models. IZA ture. Retrieved on May 13, 2016 from http://www.iza.org/conference_files/SUMS_2013/slides_2_nonlin_iza.pdf
  44. Wood, M.S., Bylund, P., & Bradley, S. (2016). The influence of tax and regulatory policies on entrepreneurs’ opportunity evaluation decisions. Management Decisions, 54(5), 1160-1182.doi.org/10.110/MD-10-2015-0446
  45. World Bank (2013). Country classifications. Retrieved on March 5, 2016 from http://data.worldbank.org/news/new-country-classifications
  46. World Bank (2013). Doing Business indicators. Retrieved on March 5, 2016 from http://www.doingbusiness.org/data
  47. World Bank Enterprise Surveys (2013). Retrieved on March 5, 2016 from http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.