The Evolution of the Virtuality Phenomenon in Organisations: A Critical Literature Review


Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to present a review of the scholarly literature development on virtual teams and to redefine the key characteristics and features of ‘team virtuality’ and ‘virtual teams’. Even though previous literature reviews enhanced the understanding of the implications brought about by virtual teams, this study differs from earlier studies in a number of ways.

Research Design & Methods: A literature review through content and citation analyses was conducted using the Web of Science, ABI/Inform and EBSCO databases in order to comprehensively explore all definitions and characteristics of the concepts of ‘virtual team’ and ‘team virtuality’. A total of 265 articles published between 2006 and 2014 were analysed, and the details of the analyses are herein presented.

Findings: The analyses reveal that the characteristics and definitions are often contradictory and rarely correspond, thereby attesting to the lack of consensus in the literature. I present a portrait that tackles the literature’s focus on virtual team’s geographic dispersion and its dependency on electronic communication as the core sources of virtuality, as a defining characteristic of virtuality remain to be the lack of face-to-face contact.

Implications & Recommendations: The major implication is that a unified definition is proposed in order to measure virtuality more comprehensively by addressing the gap observed in past research.

Contribution & Value Added: This article contributes to the literature incorporating the studies from the most extensive fields of research. After considering different approaches and dimensional constructs, it has become clear that constructing a single dimension that all research could agree upon is an insurmountable challenge due to the variations of existing definitions as outlined in this article.


Keywords

virtual teams; team virtuality; definition; literature review; content analysis

Acharya, A., Verstak, A., Suzuki, H., Henderson, S., Iakhiaev, M., Lin, C.C.Y., & Shetty, N. (2014). Rise of the rest: The growing impact of non-elite journals. CoRR: arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.2217, doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12254

Ale Ebrahim, N., Ahmed, S., & Taha, Z. (2009). Virtual teams: A literature review. Australian Jour-nal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(3), 2653-69.

Bell, B.S., & Kozlowski, S.W.J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective lead-ership. Group & Organization Management, 27, 14-49.

Benson, O. (2007). The rise of the blogger. The Philosophers Magazine, 37(1), 12-14.

Burt, K. (2009). The Internet: Proposing an infrastructure for the philosophy of virtualness. Techne: Research in Philosophy & Technology, 13(1), 50-68.

Chudoba, K.M., Wynn, E., Lu, M., & Watson-Manheim, M.B. (2005). How virtual are we? Measur-ing virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization. Information Systems Jour-nal, 15, 279-306.

Cohen, S.G., & Gibson, C.B. (2003). In the beginning: Introduction and framework. In C.B. Gibson & S.G. Cohen (Eds.), Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effective-ness (pp. 1-13). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Curseu, P.L. (2006). Emergent states in virtual teams: A complex adaptive systems perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 21(4), 249-261.

Curseu P.L., Schalk, R., & Wessel, I. (2008). How do virtual teams process information? A literature review and implications for management. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(6), 628-652.

de Guinea, A.O., Webster, J., & Staples, D.S. (2012). A meta-analysis of the consequences of virtu-alness on team functioning. Information & Management, 49(6), 301-308.

de Villiers, C., & Dumay, J. (2013). Construction of research articles in the leading interdisciplinary accounting journals. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(6), 876-910.

Dixon, K.R., & Panteli, N. (2010). From virtual teams to virtuality in teams. Human Rela-tions, 63(8), 1177-1197.

Duarte, D.L., & Snyder, N.T. (1999). Mastering virtual teams: Strategies, tools, and techniques that succeed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Gibson, C.B., & Cohen, S.G. (2003). Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Gibson, C.B., & Gibbs, J.L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innova-tion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 451-495.

Gilson, L.L., Maynard, M.T., Young, N.C.J., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2015). Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41(5). 1313-1337.

Griffith, T.L., & Neale, M.A. (2001). Information processing in traditional, hybrid, and virtual teams: From nascent knowledge to transactive memory. In B.M. Staw & R.L. Sutton (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (vol. 23, pp. 379-421). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Guo, Z., D’Ambra, J., Turner, T., & Zhang, H. (2009). Improving the effectiveness of virtual teams: A comparison of video-conferencing and face-to-face communication in China. IEEE Transac-tions on Professional Communication, 52(1), 1-16.

Hakonen, M., & Lipponen, J. (2008). Procedural justice and identification with virtual teams: The moderating role of face-to-face meetings and geographical dispersion. Social Justice Re-search, 21(2), 164-178.

Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 69-95.

Hoch, J.E., & Kozlowski, S.W.J. (2014). Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 390-403.

Janssen, M., & Joha, A. (2008). Emerging shared service organizations and the service-oriented enterprise: Critical management issues. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, 1(1), 35-49.

Jarvenpaa, S.L., & Leidner, D.E. (1998). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 3(4), doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1998.tb00080.x

Jarvenpaa, S.L., & Leidner, D. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organiza-tion Science, 10(6), 791-815.

Johnson, S.K., Bettenhausen, K., & Gibbons, E. (2009). Realities of working in virtual teams: Affec-tive and attitudinal outcomes of using computer-mediated communication. Small Group Re-search, 40(6), 623-649.

Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2002). Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3), 187-213.

Kirkman, B.L., Gibson, C.B., & Kim, K. (2012). Across borders and technologies: Advancements in virtual teams research. In S.W. Kozlowski (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Industrial and Organiza-tional Psychology (vol. 1, pp. 789-858). New York: Oxford University Press.

Kirkman, B.L., & Mathieu, J.E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31(5), 700-718.

Kirkman, B.L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P.E., & Gibson, C.B. (2004). The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Academy of Man-agement Journal, 47, 175-192.

Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J. (1997). Virtual teams: Reaching across space, time and organizations with technology. New York, NY: Wiley.

Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J. (1999). Virtual teams: The new way to work. Strategy & Leadership, 27(1), 14-19.

Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J. (2000). Virtual teams: People working across boundaries with technology, (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Mackenzie, A. (2006). Java™: the practical virtuality of internet programming. New Media & Socie-ty, 8(3), 441-465.

Malhotra, A., Majchrzak, A., & Rosen, B. (2007). Leading virtual teams. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1), 60-70.

Martins, L.L., Gilson, L.L., & Maynard, M.T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here?. Journal of Management, 30(6), 805-835.

Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Maynard, M.T., & Gilson, L.L. (2013). The role of shared mental model development in understand-ing virtual team effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 39(1), 3-32.

Maynard, M.T., Mathieu, J.E., Rapp, T.L., & Gilson, L.L. (2012). Something(s) old and something(s) new: Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behav-ior, 33(3), 342-365.

Maznevski, M.L., & Chudoba, K. (2000). Building space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organizational Science, 11(5), 473-492.

Montoya-Weiss, M., Massey, A., & Song, M. (2001). Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1251-62.

Mowshowitz, A. (1997). On the theory of virtual organization. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 14(6), 373-384.

Nyström, C.A., & Asproth, V. (2013). Virtual teams - Support for technical communication?. Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change, 10(1), 64-80.

O’Keefe, M., & Chen, E.T. (2011). The impact of emergent Web 2.0 on virtual teams. Communica-tions of the IIMA, 11(2), 91-106.

Orhan, M.A. (2014). Extending the individual level of virtuality: Implications of task virtuality in virtual and traditional settings. Administrative Sciences, 4(4), 400-412.

Orhan, M.A., Rijsman, J.B., & Van Dijk, G.M. (2016). Invisible, therefore isolated: comparative effects of team virtuality with task virtuality on workplace isolation and work out-comes. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 32(2), 109-122.

Powell, A., Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2004). Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research. ACM Sigmis Database, 35(1), 6-36.

Schiller, S.Z., & Mandviwalla, M. (2007). Virtual team research - An analysis of theory use and a framework for theory appropriation. Small Group Research, 38(1), 12-59.

Schweizer, L., & Duxbury, L. (2010). Conceptualizing and measuring the virtuality of teams. Infor-mation Systems Journal, 20(3), 267-295.

Shields, R. (2006). Virtualities. Theory Culture & Society, 23(2-3), 284-286.

Serenko, A., & Dumay, J. (2015). Citation classics published in knowledge management journals. Part I: articles and their characteristics. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(2), 401-431.

Stanko, T.L., & Gibson, C.B. (2009). Virtuality here and now: The role of cultural elements in virtual teams. In R.S. Bhagat & R.M. Steers (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Culture, Organization, and Work (pp. 272-304). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evalua-tion, 7(17), 137-146.

Styhre, A. (2006). Peer learning in construction work: Virtuality and time in workplace learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 18(2), 93-105.

Townsend, A.M., DeMarie, S.M., & Hendrickson, A.R. (1998). Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Executive, 12, 17-29.

Vartiainen, M. (2006). Mobile virtual work – concepts, outcomes and challenges. In E. Andriessen & M. Vartiainen (Eds.), Mobile Virtual Work: A New Paradigm? (pp. 13-44). Heidelberg, Ger-many: Springer.

Download

Published : 2017-12-29


OrhanM. A. (2017). The Evolution of the Virtuality Phenomenon in Organisations: A Critical Literature Review. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(4), 171-188. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050408

Mehmet A. Orhan  mehmet.orhan@online.liverpool.ac.uk
Charles University in Prague & University of Liverpool Online  Czechia
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7093-4085




Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are asked to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) only the final version of the article, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). We advise using any of the following research society portals: