Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026)
June 2026

Articles

Motivating Generation Z: An intergenerational and gender-based evaluation using the 9M model

Published 2026-06-01

  • Beáta Melinda Pózner
    • ,
  • Anita Kozák

Beáta Melinda Pózner
Eötvös Loránd University

Anita Kozák
Eötvös Loránd University

Abstract

Objective: The article aims to identify and organise the key factors that motivate Generation Z (Gen Z) workers. Generation Z enters the labour market with new expectations and preferences. A key issue for companies is to understand and explore what motivates them, as the impact of motivation on performance also affects the company’s overall effectiveness.

Research Design & Methods: The article looks at the situation after COVID-19. To provide a theoretical foundation and formulate the hypotheses, we conducted a systematic literature review based on the literature on Generation Z workers’ motivation post-2022, published in WoS and Scopus. Moreover, the article also presents the results of a primary study (n=747) based on the analysis of data collected from a questionnaire survey using the 9M motivation model. We identified the most important factors influencing the motivations of Generation Z workers in the workplace, while also presenting these factors in an intergenerational comparison. In addition to descriptive statistics, we analysed the data using inferential methods in the statistical software SPSS and AMOS.

Findings: According to the results of the primary survey, Gen Z workers are most motivated by appreciation and incentives, followed by working conditions (including remuneration, security, support systems) and thirdly by work-life balance (WLB). Among the motivational factors of the 9M, GEN Z exhibit a positive difference compared to previous generations only in terms of WLB, with all other factors being less motivating for them. Kruskal-Wallis H test showed significant differences between generations in the perception of motivational factors, WLB measures p=0, working conditions p=0.024, and quality of work and development p=0.032. The survey also confirmed that the motivation of men and women in Gen Z differs. Women are more motivated by all 9M factors than men, except for organisational culture, which is the least relevant element for Gen Z workers overall.

Implications & Recommendations: Properly motivating Generation Z workers is essential for improving their performance and retention. The study provides an overview of the current situation, and its findings highlight a significant issue.

Contribution & Value Added: Synthesising the literature review and comparing it with the findings of the primary survey helps clarify the motivational factors of Generation Z. The results of the systematic literature review show that there is a limited amount of relevant empirical research on the topic. The study contributes to the existing body of literature on Generation Z motivation.

Keywords

GEN Z, Generation Z, motivation, work-life balance, workforce

(PDF) Save

Author Biography

Beáta Melinda Pózner

PhD student (from 2022) at the Doctoral School of Business and Management, Eötvös Loránd University (Hungary), MA in economics education (2020), and MSC in management and organisation economics (2013). Her research interests include emerging HR trends and various aspects of Generation Z’s presence in the labour market.

Anita Kozák

Associate Professor of Eötvös Loránd University (Hungary), Habilitation (2021), PhD in economics and business management (2015). Her research interests include many areas of organisational behaviour and human resource management.

References

  1. Achmad, L.I., Noermijati, R., & Irawanto, D.W. (2023). Job satisfaction and employee engagement as mediators of the relationship between talent development and intention to stay in generation Z workers. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i1.814
  2. Astuty, I., Astuti, R.J., Mahmud, S.M., & Widodo, V. (2025). A closer look at the work behavior of Gen Z in Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises of developing countries. International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management, 10(1), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.22034/IJHCUM.2025.01.09
  3. Autin, K.L., Herdt, M.E., Garcia, R.G., & Ezema, G.N. (2022). Basic psychological need satisfaction, autonomous motivation, and meaningful work: a self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Career Assessment, 30(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727211018647
  4. Bakacsi, G., Takács, S., Karácsonyi, A., & Imrek, V. (2002). Eastern European cluster: Tradition and transition. Journal of World Business, 37(1), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9516(01)00075-X
  5. Balogh, P., & Nagy, R. (2018). A 9M modell motivációs vizsgálata egy vidéki egyetem gazdasági szakos hallgatóinak körébe [An analysis of the 9M motivation model among economics students at a rural university]. Metszetek, 7(4). 24-33. https://doi.org/10.18392/metsz/2018/4/2
  6. Barhate, B., & Dirani, K.M. (2022). Career aspirations of generation Z: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(1/2), 139-157. https:/doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-07-2020-0124
  7. Bartlett, M.S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 16(2), 296-298
  8. Baša, K., Machová, R., Baša, P., & Doležaiová, V. (2023). Comparative Analysis of the Workplace Expectations of Generations Y and Z. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 20(3), 211-230. https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.20.3.2023.3.13
  9. Bencsik, A., Horváth-Csikós, G., & Juhász, T. (2016). Y and Z Generations at Workplace. Journal of Competitiveness, 6(3), 90-106. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2016.03.06
  10. Berke, S., & Balazs, D. (2023). Experiencing flow from a managerial perspective among different generations. IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics, CINTI 2023 – Proceedings, 347-352. https:/doi.org/10.1109/CINTI59972.2023.10382065
  11. Bhore, M., & Tapas, P. (2023). An exploratory study of factors influencing career decisions of Generation Z women in data science. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v21i0.2168
  12. Bińczycki, B., Łukasiński, W., & Dorocki, S. (2023). Determinants of motivation to work in terms of industry 4.0 – the gen Z perspective. Sustainability 15(15), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151512069
  13. Bucovetchi, O., Slusariuc, G.C., & Cincalova, S. (2019). Generation Z – Key Factor for Organizational Innovation. Quality-Access to Success, 20, 25-30.
  14. Byrne, B.M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  15. Cameron, J., Pierce, W.D., Banko, K.M., & Gear, A. (2005). Achievement-Based Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation:A Test of Cognitive Mediators. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 641-655. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.641
  16. Chillakuri, B. (2020). Understanding generation Z expectations for effective onboarding. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(7), 1277-1296. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02-2020-0058
  17. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
  18. Deci, E.L., Olafsen, A.H., & Ryan, R.M. (2017). Self‑Determination Theory in Work Organizations. In G.R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (Vol. 35, pp. 193-235). Emerald.
  19. Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  20. Dwivedula, R. (2025). Why Is Generation Z Motivated at Work? A Qualitative Exploration. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 44, 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.2227338 of 49
  21. El-Menawy, S.M.A., & Saleh, P. S. (2023). How does the mediating role of the use of social media platforms foster the relationship between employer attractiveness and generation Z intentions to apply for a job?. Future Business Journal, 9(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-023-00233-0
  22. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
  23. Gagné, M., & Deci, E.L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
  24. Ganguli, R., & Padhy, S.C. (2023). Moderating Effect of Demographic Factors on the Relationship Between Work Motivation and Employee Retention of Gen Z. NMIMS Management Review, 31(2), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/09711023231197819
  25. Grenier, S., Gagné, M., & O’Neill, T. (2024). Self determination theory and its implications for team motivation. Applied Psychology, 73(4), 1833-1865. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12526
  26. Gribanova, S. (2024). What motivates the creativity of Generation Z employees? The influence of extrinsic and incristic motivating factors on the example of IT specialists from EU countries. Vide. Environment. Technology. Resources. Proceedings of the 15th International Scientific and Practical Conference, 2, 380-386. https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2024vol2.8071
  27. Grigore, A.M., & Elbers, F. (2023). From Boomers to Zoomers: challenges in managing the multigenerational workforce. In A. E. Sasu & D. I. Clipa (Eds.), Griffiths School of Management and IT Annual Conference on Business, Entrepreneurship and Ethics (pp. 399-413). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59858-6_27
  28. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  29. Hartner-Tiefenthaler, M., Zedlacher, E., & el Sehity. T.J. (2022). Remote workers’ free associations with working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic in Austria: The interaction between children and gender. Frontier Psycholgy 13:859020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859020
  30. Herzberg, F. (1987). One more time: How do you motivate employees?. Harvard Business Review, 65(5), 109-120.
  31. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  32. Hofstede Insights. (2024). Country comparison – Hungary, Poland, Romania, Czech Republic. Retrieved from https://www.hofstede-insights.com on October 31, 2025.
  33. Hu, L-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  34. Hurley, E., Dietrich, T., & Rundle-Thiele, S. (2021). Integrating theory in Co-design: an abductive approach. Australasian Marketing Journal, 29(1), 66-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1839334921998541
  35. Ichsan, M., Dwidienawati, D., & Pradipto, Y. D. (2021). Does passion matter in career interest in generation Y and Z?. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 1-9. Retrieved from https://www.abacademies.org/articles/does-passion-matter-in-career-interest-in-generation-y-and-z.pdf on May 28, 2025.
  36. International Labour Organization (ILO). (2024). Global Employment Trends for Youth 2024: Decent work, brighter futures. Geneva: International Labour Office. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/2024-11/GET_2024_EN_web4.pdf on May 28, 2025.
  37. Jäckel, K., & Garai-Fodor, M. (2024). Aspects of Generation Z job choice in 2023 based on the results of primary research among Chinese and Hungarian youth. 2024 IEEE 22nd World Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics, SAMI 2024 – Proceedings, 111-114. https://doi.org/10.1109/SAMI60510.2024.10432882
  38. Kaiser, H.F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23(3), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289233
  39. Kaiser, H.F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
  40. Klages, B., Welz, V., Kroeger, S., Bernhard, O., & Zaeh, M. (2023). Towards the derivation of measures to improve the intrinsic motivation and the affective commitment of employees in manual line assembly. 56th CIRP International Conference on Manufacturing Systems 2023, 120, 583-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.09.041
  41. Kline, R.B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
  42. Konrad, A.M., Ritchie, J.E., Jr., Lieb, P., & Corrigall, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 593-641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.4.593
  43. Kozák, A., & Pózner, B.M. 2024. Generation Z motivation at work based on the 9M model. Új Munkaügyi Szemle, 5(4), 2-13. https://doi.org/10.58269/umsz.2024.4.1
  44. Krajčík, M., Schmidt, D.A., & Baráth, M. (2023). Hybrid Work Model: An Approach to Work-Life Flexibility in a Changing Environment. Administrative Sciences, 13(6), 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13060150
  45. Lašáková, A., Vojteková, M., & Procházková, L. (2023). What (De)Motivates Gen Z women and Gen Z men at work? Comparative study of gender differences in the young generation’s motivation. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 24(4), 771-796. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2023.20439
  46. Lee, C.C., Lim, H.S., Seo, D.J., & Kwak, D.-H.A. (2022). Examining employee retention and motivation: the moderating effect of employee generation. Evidence-based HRM, 10(4), 385-402. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-05-2021-0101
  47. Ling, F.Y.Y., & Lew, E.J.Y. (2024). Strategies to recruit and retain generation Z in the built environment sector. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2024-1109
  48. Ludviga, I., & Sluka, I. (2023). Work values and motivating factors of generation Z – the analysis of empirical research in Poland, Portugal, and Latvia. Managing Generation Z: Motivation, Engagement and Loyalty, 31-59. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003353935-4
  49. Machova, R., Zsigmond, T., Zsigmondova, A., & Seben, Z. (2022). Employee satisfaction and motivation of retail store employees. Marketing and Management of Innovation, 1, 67-83. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2022.1-05
  50. Magano, J., Silva, C., Figueiredo, C., Vitória, A., Nogueira, T., & Pimenta Dinis, M.A. (2020). Generation Z: fitting project management soft skills competencies – A mixed-method approach. Education Sciences, 10(7), Article 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10070187
  51. Mahmoud, A.B., Fuxman, L., Mohr, I., Reisel, W., & Grigoriou, N. (2021). We aren’t your reincarnation! International Journal of Manpower, 42(1), 193-209. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/IJM-09-2019-0448
  52. Mannheim, K. (1952). The problem of generations. In P. Kecskemeti (Ed.), Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, 5, 276-322). Routledge.
  53. Maslow, A.H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
  54. Mathe, H., Pavie, X., & O’Keffe, M. (2011). Valuing people to create value. Word Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapure.
  55. McClelland, D.C. (1961). The achieving society. Van Nostrand.
  56. McCrindle, M., & Wolfinger, E. (2010). Generations defined. Ethos. 18(1), 8-13.
  57. Minahan, T. (2021, January 14). What your future employees want most. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2021/01/what-your-future-employees-want-most on May 28, 2025.
  58. Moller, A.C., & Deci, E.L. (2014). The Psychology of Getting Paid: An Integrated Perspective. In E. Bijleveld & H. Aarts (Eds.), The psychological science of money (pp. 189-311). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0959-9_9
  59. Naim, M.F. (2022). What matters most for Indian Generation Y employees? An empirical study based on work-values. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 41(3), 55-68. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/joe.22134
  60. Nakamura, J., & Csíkszentmihályi, M. (2009). Flow theory and research. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (pp. 195-206). Oxford University Press.
  61. Nieżurawska, J., Kycia, R.A., Ludviga, I., & Niemczynowicz, A. (2023). Structured multi-criteria model of self-managed motivation in organizations based on happiness at work: pandemic related study. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 16521. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43626-5
  62. Nieżurawska, J., & Gałaś, A. (2021). The Virus of Happiness at Work Design the engagement and motivation of young employees (ISBN 9788396372222). MIERO.
  63. Nusraningrum, D., Rahmawati, A., Wider, W., Jiang, L., & Udang, L.N. (2024). Enhancing employee performance through motivation: The mediating roles of green work environments and engagement in Jakarta’s logistics sector. Frontiers in Sociology, 9:1392229. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1392229
  64. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2024). Creating pathways to success for young people. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/creating-pathways-to-success-for-young-people_fa0145d1-en.html on May 28, 2025.
  65. Ortiz, M., Carlos, P., Guillermo, M., & Ronda, A. (2020). Bibliometric assessment of papers on generations in management and business journals. Scientometrics, 125(1), 445-469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03670-8
  66. Over, H. (2016). The origins of belonging: social motivation in infants and young children. Philosphical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1686):20150072. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0072
  67. Page M.J., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, 71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  68. Pandita, D. (2022). Innovation in talent management practices: creating an innovative employer branding strategy to attract generation Z. International Journal of Innovation Science, 14(3/4), 556-569. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-10-2020-0217
  69. Pew Research Center (PRC) (2015). The Whys and Hows of Generations Research. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2015/09/03/the-whys-and-hows-of-generations-research/?utm on June 11, 2025.
  70. Plakhotnik, M.S., Volkova, N.V., & Shahzad, M.B. (2024). Investigating job characteristics of generations Y and Z: A latent profile analysis. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 44(2), 24-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22270
  71. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  72. Pózner B.M., & Kozák A. (2024). Aktualitás HR problémák a hazai vállalkozások körében: túlzó fizetési elvárások, fluktuáció, home office és társai. [Current HR problems among domestic enterprises: excessive salary expectations, turnover, home office and others]. Új Munkaügyi Szemle, 5(3), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.58269/umsz.2024.3.3
  73. Pulevska-Ivanovska, L., Postolov, K., Janeska-Iliev, A., & Magdinceva Sopova, M. (2017). Establishing balance between professional and private life of generation Z. Research in Physical Education, Sport and Health, 6(1), 3-9. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/4956 on May 28, 2025.
  74. Rachmatdianto, A., Irvan, Nathan, J., & Prasetyaningtyas, S.W. (2023). Managing talent in digital marketing industry: the case of Indonesia. 2023 8th International Conference on Business and Industrial Research (ICBIR), May, 341-346. https://doi.org/10.1109/icbir57571.2023.10147662
  75. Revuru, I., & Bandaru, K.K. (2024). Leadership Practices for Sustaining Work Engagement: A Gen-Z Perspective. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 13(2), 451-466. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2024.60424
  76. Rosdiana, R. (2020). Analysis of investment interests, motivation, social environment, financial literacy. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 22(1), 111-121. Retrieved from https://www.ijbel.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/IJBEL22_239.pdf?utm on May 28, 2025.
  77. Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  78. Salvadorinho, J., Ferreira, C., & Teixeira, L. (2024). A technology-based framework to foster the lean human resource 4.0 and prevent the great resignation: The talent management lift. Technology in Society, 77(6), Article 102510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102510
  79. Schroth, H. (2019). Are You Ready for Gen Z in the Workplace?. California Management Review, 61(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619841006
  80. Shah, M., & Asad, M. (2018). Effect of motivation on employee retention: mediating role of perceived organizational support. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 7(2), 511-520.
  81. Smolka, S. (2019). Charakteristika generácií slovenských spotrebiteľov. [Characteristics of generations of Slovak consumers]. Marketing Science & Inspirations, 14(1), 2-11.
  82. Springer, M.L. (2023). Multiple generations in the workplace — It’s how we grew up. In Project and Program Management: A competency-based approach (5th ed., pp. 149-196). Purdue University Press.
  83. Surugiu, C., Surugiu, M.R., Grădinaru, C., & Grigore, A.M. (2025). Factors Motivating Generation Z in the Workplace: Managerial Challenges and Insights. Administrative Sciences, 15(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15010029
  84. Taryana, T., Riniati, W.O., Haddar, G.A., Sembiring, D., & Mutmainnah, M. (2023). The influence of teacher certification and teaching motivation on teacher performance. Journal on Education, 5, 6726-6735. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i3.1455
  85. Tayal, S., & Rajagopal, K. (2024). Gamification with Codeathon for Productivity Toward Sustainable Development Goal 8 – Decent Work and Economic Growth. Brazilian Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21(4):e20242089. https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2089.2024
  86. Thant, Z.M., & Chang, Y. (2021). Determinants of public employee job satisfaction in Myanmar: Focus on Herzberg’s two factor theory. Public Organization Review, 21(1), 157-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-020-00481-6
  87. Twenge, J.M., Campbell, W.K., & Freeman, E.C. (2012). Generational differences in young adults’ life goals, concern for others, and civic orientation, 1966-2009. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 1045-1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027408
  88. Varga, J. (2021). Defning the Economic Role and Benefts of Micro, Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in the 21st Century with a Systematic Review of the Literature. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica 18(11), 209-228. https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.18.11.2021.11.12
  89. Vieira, J., Gomes da Costa, C., & Santos, V. (2024). Talent management and generation z: a systematic literature review through the lens of employer branding. Administrative Sciences, 14(3), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14030049.
  90. Vo, T.T.D., Tuliao, K.V., & Chen, C.W. (2022). Work motivation: The roles of individual needs and social conditions. Behavioral Sciences, 12(2), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12020049
  91. Williams, A. (2015, September 18). Move over, millennials, here comes Generation Z. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/20/fashion/move-over-millennials-here-comes-generation-z.html on May 28, 2025.
  92. Yang, W., Wang, Y., Choi, M., & Li, Y. (2024). Influence of mentoring on the proactive behavior of new employees: moderated mediation effect of agreeableness. Frontiers in Psychology, 15:1370815. https:/doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1370815
  93. Zhong, Y., Zhang, L., Wei, W., & Chang, J.C.-J. (2023). Attracting Gen Z workforce: the effects of organizational social media policy. Tourism Review, 79(3), https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-11-2022-0582
  94. Zoellner, K., & Sulikova, R. (2022). Enhancing Employees’ Motivation Amid the Crisis of COVID-19. Journal of Human Resources Management Research, ID 486239. https://doi.org/10.5171/2022.486239

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.