Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2018)
Exporting, International Cooperation and FDI

Thematic Articles

Greenfield or Acquisition Entry? An Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on the Competitiveness of Polish Investors

https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2018.060207

Published 2018-06-15

  • Małgorzata Jaworek
    • ,
  • Włodzimierz Karaszewski
    • ,
  • Małgorzata Szałucka

Małgorzata Jaworek
Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun

Włodzimierz Karaszewski
Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun

Małgorzata Szałucka
Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this article is to determine the impact of Polish FDI companies on their competitiveness, depending on their establishment mode choice in the host country (greenfield investment vs. acquisition).

Research Design & Methods: The study used a direct interview method. The results were analysed using impact indicators (w) calculated as the arithmetic mean of numerical values assigned to each response as well as Fisher’s exact test. Statistical calculations were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics software version 21.0.0.1.

Findings: The impact of FDI on investor competitiveness in relation to the main competitors operating on the home market and on foreign markets depends on FDI entry mode (greenfield investment vs. acquisition), among other things.

Implications & Recommendations: The results of this study may be the starting point for further research on the impact of FDI on competitiveness, particularly through foreign acquisitions. It should be assumed that as Polish companies gain experience on the international stage, this mode of entry will be chosen by investors more frequently.

Contribution & Value Added: The uniqueness of the following study is in the presentation of the results of original empirical research, which demonstrate the relationship between the foreign establishment mode choice (greenfield investment vs. acquisition) and the competitiveness of investing companies. Ex post evaluations were taken into account while forming the conclusions.

Keywords

international business, FDI, establishment mode choice, greenfield, acquisition, competitiveness

PDF

References

  1. Arslan, A., & Larimo, J. (2011). Greenfield investments or acquisitions: Impacts of institutional distance on establishment mode choice of multinational enterprises in emerging economies. Journal of Global Marketing, 24(4), 345-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2011.602323
  2. Barkema, H.G., & Vermeulen, F. (1998). International Expansion Through Start-up or Acquisition: a Learning Perspective. Academic Management Journal, 41(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.2307/256894
  3. Brouthers, K.D., & Brouthers, L.E. (2000). Acquisition or greenfield start-up? Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200001)21:1<89::AID-SMJ85>3.0.CO;2-8
  4. Brouthers, K.D., & Hennart, J.-F. (2007). Boundaries of the firm: Insights from international entry mode research. Journal of Management, 33(3), 395-425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300817
  5. Bruning, E.R., Turtle, H.J., & Buhr, K. (1997). Characterizing mode of entry for Canadian foreign direct investment into the United States: 1980-1989. International Journal of Commerce & Management, 7(3/4), 56-80.
  6. Caves, R.E., & Mehra S.K. (1986). Entry of foreign multinationals into the US manufacturing industries. In M.E. Porter (Ed.), Competition in global industries (pp. 449-481). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  7. Cho, K.R., & Padmanabhan, P. (1995). Acquisition versus new venture: The choice of foreign estab-lishment mode by Japanese firms. Journal of International Management, 1(3), 255-286.
  8. Daszkiewicz, N., & Wach, K. (2013). Małe i średnie przedsiębiorstwa na rynkach międzynarodo-wych, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie.
  9. Datta, D.K., Herrmann, P., & Rasheed, A.A. (2002). Choice of foreign market entry mode: critical review and future directions. Advances in Comparative International Management, 14, 85-153.
  10. Demirbag, M., Tatoglu, E., & Glaister, K.W. (2008). Factors affecting perceptions of the choice between acquisition and greenfield entry: The case of Western FDI in an emerging market. Management International Review, 48(1), 5-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-008-0002-3
  11. Demirbag, M., Tatoglu, E., & Glaister, K.W. (2009). Equity-based entry modes of emerging country multinationals: Lessons from Turkey. Journal of World Business, 44(4), 445-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2008.11.009
  12. Dikova, D., & Brouthers, K.D. (2016). International establishment mode choice: past, present and future. Management International Review, 56(4), 489-530.
  13. Gorynia, M. (2007). Strategie zagranicznej ekspansji przedsiębiorstw. Warszawa: PWE.
  14. Gorynia, M., Nowak, J., Trąpczyński, P., & Wolniak, R. (2015a). Establishment mode choices of emerging multinationals: evidence from Poland. Managing Global Transitions, 13(2), 101-124.
  15. Gorynia, M., Nowak, J., Trąpczyński, P., & Wolniak, R. (2015b). Outward FDI of Polish firms: The role of motives, entry modes and location factors. Journal of East European Management Studies, 20(3), 328-359.
  16. GUS (2017). Działalność podmiotów posiadających jednostki zagraniczne w 2015 r. Warszawa.
  17. Harzing, A.-W. (2002). Acquisitions versus greenfield investments: International strategy and management of entry modes. Strategic Management Journal, 23(3), 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.218
  18. Hennart, J.-F., Kim, D.-J., & Zeng M. (1998). The impact of joint venture status on the longevity of Japanese stakes in U.S. manufacturing affiliates. Organization Science, 9(3), 382-395. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.3.382
  19. Hennart, J.-F., Larimo, J., & Chen S.-F. (1996). Does national origin affect the propensity of foreign investors to enter the United States through acquisitions?. Finland: Proceedings of the University of Vaasa (Discussion paper no. 189).
  20. Hennart, J.-F., & Park, Y.R. (1993). Greenfield vs. acquisition: the strategy of Japanese investors in the United States. Management Science, 39(9), 1054-1070. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.9.1054
  21. Holtbrügge, D., & Berningn, S.C. (January, 2018). Market entry strategies and performance of Chinese firms in Germany: The moderating effect of home government support. Management International Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-017-0334-y
  22. Jiménez‐Burillo, S., & Jiménez‐Moreno, J.J. (2013). The Role of the Top Management Team in the Choice of Entry Modes – Theoretical Perspective. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 1(2), 51‐58. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2013.010205
  23. Karaszewski, W., & Szałucka, M. (2011). Bezpośrednie inwestycje zagraniczne – greenfield versus brownfield. Przegląd Organizacji, 5, 23-26.
  24. Kowalewski, O., & Radło, M-J. (2014). Determinants of foreign investment and entry modes of Polish multinational enterprises: A new perspective on internationalization. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 47(3-4), 365-374.
  25. Larimo, J. (2003). Form of investment by Nordic firms in world markets. Journal of Business Research, F56(10), 791-803.
  26. Padmanabhan, P., & Cho, K.R. (1999). Decision-specific experience in foreign ownership and establishment strategies: Evidence from Japanese firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1), 25-44.
  27. Pennings, J.M., Barkema, H., & Douma, S. (1994). Organizational learning and diversification. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 608-640.
  28. Shaver, J.M. (1998). Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: does entry mode choice affect FDI survival?. Management Science, 44(4), 571-585. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.4.571
  29. Shen, Z., & Puig, F. (November, 2017). Spatial dependence of the FDI Entry Mode Decision: Empiri-cal Evidence From Emerging Market Enterprises. Management International Review, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-017-0332-0
  30. Shimizu, K., Hitt, M.A., Vaidyanath, D., & Pisano, V. (2004). Theoretical foundations of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A review of current research and recommendations for the future. Journal of International Management, 10(3), 307-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2004.05.005
  31. Shrader, R. (2001). Collaboration and Performance in Foreign Markets: the Case of Young High-technology Manufacturing Firms. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069336
  32. Slangen, A. (2011). A Communication‐based Theory of the Choice between Greenfield and Acquisition Entry. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1699-1726. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01013.x
  33. Slangen, A. (2013). Greenfield or Acquisition Entry? The Roles of Policy Uncertainty and MNE Legitimacy in Host Countries. Global Strategy Journal, 3(3), 262-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-5805.2013.01056.x
  34. Slangen, A., & Hennart, J.-F. (2007). Greenfield or acquisition entry: a review of the empirical foreign establishment mode literature. Journal of International Management, 13(4), 403-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2007.08.001
  35. Slangen, A., & Hennart, J.-F. (2008). Do Foreign Greenfields Outperform Foreign Acquisitions or vice versa? An perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(7), 1301-1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00794.x
  36. Szałucka, M. (2008). Wpływ bezpośrednich inwestycji zagranicznych na konkurencyjność polskich inwestorów. In W. Karaszewski (Ed.), Bezpośrednie inwestycje zagraniczne polskich przedsię-biorstw (pp. 171-240). Toruń: Wydawnictwo TNOiK “Dom Organizatora”.
  37. Szałucka, M. (2010). Acquisition versus Greenfield Investment: The Impact on the Competitiveness of Polish Companies. Journal of Business Management, 3, 3-15.
  38. UNCTAD (2009). Training Manual on Statistics for FDI and the Operations of TNCs. New York and Geneva: United Nations.
  39. UNCTAD (2016). World Investment Report 2016. Investor Nationality: Policy Challenges. New York and Geneva: United Nations.
  40. Vermeulen, F., & Barkema, H.G. (2001). Learning through acquisitions. Academic Management Journal, 44(3), 457-476.
  41. Wach, K. (2012). Europeizacja małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw: rozwój przez umiędzynarodowienie. Warszawa: PWN.
  42. Werner, S. (2002). Recent Developments in International Management Research: A Review of 20 Top Management Journals. Journal of Management, 28(3), 277-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630202800303
  43. Woodcock, C.P., Beamish, P., & Makino, S. (1994). Ownership-based Entry Mode Strategies and International Performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2), 253-274.
  44. Zejan, M. (1990). New Ventures or Acquisitions: the Choice of Swedish Multinational Enterprises. Journal of Industrial Economics, 38(3), 349-355.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.