Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 6 No. 4 (2018)
Foreign Entrepreneurs in China

Thematic Articles

Innovations and Export Performance: Firm Level Evidence from China

https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2018.060402

Published 2018-12-18

  • Andrzej Cieślik
    • ,
  • Yi Qu
    • ,
  • Ting Qu

Andrzej Cieślik
University of Warsaw

Yi Qu
Surrey International Institute, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics

Ting Qu
The Institute of Regional Economy and System Engineering, Hunan Academy of Social Sciences

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this article is to study the relationship between innovations and exporting of Chinese firms and identify which type of innovation contributes most to the probability of exporting.

Research Design & Methods: We refer to the recent strand in the new trade theory literature that stresses the importance of firm productivity in entering export markets. We distinguish between product, process and managerial innovations that can increase productivity. The empirical investigation is based on the probit model and the firm-level data set covering two years: 2003 and 2012.

Findings: Our empirical results show that the probability of exporting is positively related to product and process innovations, firm size, foreign capital participation and foreign technology. Moreover, we find that in 2003 process innovations were more important for export performance than product innovations, while in 2012 it was the opposite.

Implications & Recommendations: Firms should coordinate their strategic assets and resources for innovation in order to enhance their overall level of competitiveness. Governments should work on establishing stronger institutional environment necessary to provide firms with protection of intellectual property rights, an easier access to financing of innovation, a lower tax burden upon innovative firms, the higher quality of human resources to firms and more supportive policy packages.

Contribution & Value Added: In contrast to previous that used only the R&D spending as the measure of innovation in our study we also use innovation outcomes. In particular, we determine which innovation type is of greatest importance, having controlled for the set of other firm characteristics.


Keywords

China, export activity, firm heterogeneity, innovations, probit model

PDF

References

  1. Atkeson, A., & Burstein A. (2007). Innovation, firm dynamics, and international trade. (NBER work-ing paper, no. 13326). https://doi.org/10.1086/653690
  2. Aw, B.Y., Roberts, M.J., & Xu, D.Y. (2009). R&D investment, exporting, and productivity dynamics. (NBER working paper, no. 14670). https://doi.org/10.1086/65369010.1257/aer.101.4.1312
  3. Basile, R. (2001). Export behavior of Italian manufacturing firms over the nineties: the role of innovation. Research Policy, 30, 1185-1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00141-4
  4. Becker, S.O., & Egger, P.H. (2013). Endogenous product versus process innovation and a firm’s propensity to export. Empirical Economics, 44, 329-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0322-6
  5. Bernard, A., & Jensen, J.B. (1999). Exceptional export performance: cause, effect, or both?. Journal of International Economics, 47, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00027-0
  6. Braunerhjelm, P. (1996). The relation between firm specific intangibles and exports. Economic Letters, 53, 213-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(96)00898-1
  7. Brodzicki, T. (2017). Internationalisation and Innovation Intensities of Polish Manufacturing Firms: A Close Nexus?. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(1), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050106
  8. Caldera, A. (2010). Innovation and exporting: evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Review of World Economy, 146, 657-689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-010-0065-7
  9. Cassiman, B., Golovko, E., & Martínez-Ros, E. (2010). Innovation, exports and productivity. Interna-tional Journal of Industrial Organization, 28, 372-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2010.03.005
  10. Cieślik, A., Michałek, J.J., & Michałek, A. (2012). Export activity in Visegrad-4 countries: Firm level investigation. Ekonomia, Rynek, Gospodarka, Społeczeństwo, 30, 7-22.
  11. Cieślik, A., Michałek, J.J., & Michałek, A. (2014a). The Influence of Firm Characteristics and Export Performance in Central and Eastern Europe: Comparisons of Visegrad, Baltic and Caucasus states. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 2(1), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2014.020102
  12. Cieślik, A., Michałek, J.J., & Michałek, A. (2014b). European integration and firm’s export perfor-mance in the new EU member countries. Poznań University of Economics Review, 14(4), 38-53.
  13. Cieślik, A., Michałek, J.J., & Michałek, T. (2014c). Firm characteristics and export performance in post-communist countries. In N. Daszkiewicz & K. Wach (Eds.), Firm-Level Internationalisation and Its Business Environment, Knowledge-based and Entrepreneurial Approach (pp. 34-45). Gdańsk: Gdańsk University of Technology Publishing House. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3832.9282
  14. Cieślik, A., Michałek, J.J., Michałek, A., & Mycielski, J. (2015). Determinants of export performance: Comparison of Central European and Baltic firms. Finance a Uver, 65(3), 211-229.
  15. Cieślik, A., Michałek, J.J., & Szczygielski, K. (2016). Innovations and Export Performance: Firm-level Evidence from Poland. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(4), 11-28. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2016.040402
  16. Cieślik, A., & Michałek, J.J. (2017). Innovation Forms and Firm Export Performance: Empirical Evi-dence from ECA Countries. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(2), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050205
  17. Cieślik, A., & Michałek, J.J. (2018). Firm-level determinants of direct and indirect exports: empirical evidence for C.E.E. and M.E.N.A. countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 982-996. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1436452
  18. Constantini, J.A., & Melitz, M.J. (2008). The dynamics of firm-level adjustment to trade liberaliza-tion. In E. Helpman, D. Marin & T. Verdier (Eds.), The organization of firms in a global econo-my (pp. 107 - 141). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  19. De Loecker, J. (2007). Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia. Journal of International Economics, 73(1), 69-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2007.03.003
  20. Grossman, G.M., Helpman, E., & Szeidl, A. (2006). Optimal integration strategies for the multina-tional firm. Journal of International Economics, 70, 216-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2005.07.011
  21. Guan, J., & Ma, N. (2003). Innovative capabilities and export performance of Chinese firms. Tech-novation, 23(9), 737-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00013-5
  22. Hirsch, S., & Bijaoui, I. (1985). R&D Intensity and export performance: a micro view. Welt-wirtschaftliches Archiv, 121, 138-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02705822
  23. Hopenhayn, H.A. (1992). Entry, exit, and firm dynamics in long run equilibrium. Econometrica, 60, 1127-1150. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951541
  24. Huang, X., Hu, X., & Liu, Y. (2015). Product innovation, process innovation and export propensity of Chinese firms. Economics (Chinese Journal), 4, 22-30.
  25. Jovanovic, B. (1982). Selection and the evolution of industry. Econometrica, 50, 649-670. https:/doi.org/10.2307/1912606
  26. Kumar, N., & Siddharthan, N.S. (1994). Technology, firm size and export behavior in developing countries: the case of Indian enterprise. Journal of Development Studies, 32, 288-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389408422362
  27. Lachenmaier, S., & Wößmann, L.W. (2006). Does innovation cause exports? Evidence from exoge-nous innovation impulses and obstacles using German micro data. Oxford Economic Papers, 58, 317-350. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpi043
  28. Liu, X., & Shu, C., (2003). Determinants of export performance of Chinese industries. Economics of Planning, 36, 45-67. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ECOP.0000005728.05260.5d
  29. Melitz, M.J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71, 1695-1725. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467
  30. Roper, S., & Love, J.H. (2002). Innovation and export performance: evidence from the UK and Ger-man manufacturing plants. Research Policy, 31, 1087-1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00175-5
  31. Spencer, B.J., & Brander, J.A. (1983). International R&D rivalry and industrial strategy. Review of Economic Studies, 50(4), 707-722. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297771
  32. Van Beveren, I., & Vandenbussche, H. (2010). Product and process innovation and firms’ decision to export. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 13(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870903546267
  33. Wagner, J. (1996). Export performance, human capital, and product innovation in Germany: a micro view. Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, 47, 40-45.
  34. Wakelin, K. (1997). Trade and Innovation. Theory and Evidence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  35. Wakelin, K. (1998). Innovation and export behaviour at the firm level. Research Policy, 26(7-8), 829-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00051-6
  36. Wei, W., & An, X. (2016). Innovation, institutions and export performance. Research on Financial and Economic Issues (Chinese Journal), 3, 45-60.
  37. Qu, Y., & Wei, Y. (2017). The Role of Domestic Institutions and FDI on Innovation-Evidence from Chinese Firms. Asian Economic Papers, 16(2), 55-76. https://doi.org/10.1162/ASEP_a_00519
  38. Qu, Y., Qu, T., & Wu, Y. (2017). The role of regional formal institutions and foreign direct invest-ment in innovation in Chinese enterprises. Asia Pacific Business Review, 23(1), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2015.1094293
  39. Qu, Y., Wei, Y., Jiang, T., & Zheng, N. (2017). Linking R&D strategy, national innovation system and FDI to firm performance. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 15(1), 41-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2016.1242310
  40. Zhao, H., & Li, H. (1997). R&D and export: An empirical analysis of Chinese manufacturing
  41. firms. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 8(1), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(97)90015-8
  42. Zhou, Y., & Song, L. (2016). International trade and R&D investment: Evidence from Chinese manu-facturing firms. China and World Economy, 24(1), 63-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12144

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.