The Capacity of JESSICA Projects to Repay Loans Based on Own Revenues
Objective: Objectives of the article are the following: to identify 1) similarity/ dissimilarity in Polish regions with regard to the implementation of JESSICA projects in terms of the size of JESSICA loans/ projects and the legal form of beneficiaries, 2) what factors have the biggest impact on the project capacities to generate revenues.
Research Design & Methods: The authors used the logistic regression to build a model showing the association of the variables analysed on the dependent variable. In addition, to point out a relative importance from all possible orderings of explanatory variables and to show the most important one(s), ANOVA method was applied.
Findings: Not all the projects co-financed under the JESSICA initiative bring revenues from their main operations. The legal form of a beneficiary plays an important role. Both projects implemented by companies and projects of a relatively high value increase the probability of generating revenues. Location of the project (capital city/ non-capital city of the region) is not significant with regard to capacities to generate revenues.
Implications & Recommendations: JESSICA projects characterised with a high value and implemented by entities having the company status involve private capital and consequently generate capital backflows. They contribute to leverage effects and thereby raise the role of JESSICA as a powerful instrument aimed at rendering existing market failures. It seems that the results of the study might help to design the use of JESSICA resources in the current and the future EU financial perspective.
Contribution & Value Added: The article sheds more light on a still under-researched area of the use of financial instruments in the EU Cohesion Policy. The analysis provides pioneering results and points out the vital issues for future research.
JESSICA; Poland; regeneration; revenue-generating projects; Cohesion Policy
Arup. (2009). JESSICA Evaluation Study – West Poland. Retrieved from http://www.eib.org/ attachments/jessica-poland-west_en.pdf on December 1, 2018.
Bode, M. (2015). Financial Instruments in Cohesion Policy. European Structural and Investment Funds Journal, 3(3), 173-186.
CCI. (2010). JESSICA Evaluation Study for Silesia. Retrieved from https://www.eib.org/attachments/ documents/jessica-evaluation-study-for-silesia-en.pdf on November 1, 2018.
Dąbrowski, M. (2014). Engineering Multilevel Governance? Joint European Support for Sustainable Investment in City Areas (JESSICA) and the Involvement of Private and Financial Actors in Urban Development Policy. Regional Studies, 48(12), 2006-2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.914625
Dąbrowski, M. (2015). ‘Doing more with less’ or ‘doing less with less’? Assessing EU cohesion policy’s financial instruments for urban development. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 73-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2014.999107
EIB. (2010a). JESSICA – Holding Fund Handbook. Luxembourg. Retrieved from http://www.eib.org/ attachments/documents/jessica_holding_fund_handbook_en.pdf on November 1, 2018.
EIB. (2010b). JESSICA Evaluation Study for Pomerania. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/ regional_policy/archive/funds/2007/jjj/doc/pdf/jessica/poland_evaluation_pomerania.pdf on November 1, 2018.
EIB. (2011). JESSICA Evaluation Study. Implementing JESSICA Instruments in Mazowieckie Voivodship, Poland. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/ funds/2007/jjj/doc/pdf/ jessica/14-jessica_evaluation_study_in_mazowieckie_voivodship_en.pdf on November 5, 2018.
European Commission. (2013b). JESSICA: Joint European Support for Sustainable Investment in City Areas. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/funding/special-support-instruments/ jessica/#2 on November 5, 2018.
European Commission. (2013b). How does JESSICA work?. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/ regional_policy/en/funding/special-support-instruments/jessica/#3 on November 5, 2018.
European Commission. (2014). Summary of data on the progress made in financing and implementing financial engineering instruments reported by the managing authorities n accordance with Article 67(2)(j) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/ sources/thefunds/instruments/doc/summary_data_fei_2013.pdf on November 1, 2018.
Fotino, F. (2014). The JESSICA Action in Italy 2007-2013. Bottlenecks, Opportunities, and Directions for the Future. European Structural and Investment Funds Journal, 2(3), 245-255. Retrieved from https://estif.lexxion.eu/article/ESTIF/2014/3/9 on November 1, 2018.
Held, T., & Jakubowski, P. (2009). JESSICA und Stadtentwicklungsfonds — Neue Aufgaben für alte Landesentwicklungsgesellschaften?. Raumforschung Und Raumordnung, 67(1), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03183144
Lever, J., Krzywinski, M., & Altman, N. (2016). Logistic regression. Nature Methods, 13(7), 541-542. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3904
Mazars. (2013). Financial Management in JESSICA Implementation Designing. Guarantee Products. Retrieved from http://www.eib.org/attachments/ documents/jessica_fg_final_ report_en.pdf on November 1, 2018.
Memorandum of Understanding. (2006). Memorandum of Understanding in Respect of a Coordinated Approach to the Financing of Urban renewal and Development for Programming Period 2007-2013 of the Community Structural Funds between the European Commission, the European Investment Bank and the Cou. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/ regional_policy/archive/funds/2007/jjj/doc/pdf/urban_mou_signed.pdf on October 15, 2018.
Musiałkowska, I., & Idczak, P. (2016). The use of repayable financial instruments in the process of regeneration of degraded urban areas on the example of the JESSICA initiative. In Changes and Challenges in the Modern World Economy (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 115-136). Poznań: PUEB Press. Retrieved from https://depot.ceon.pl/handle/123456789/12083 on November 1, 2018.
Musiałkowska, I., & Idczak, P. (2018a). Is the JESSICA initiative truly repayable instrument? The Polish case study. Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics, 536,143-151. https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2018.536.13.
Musiałkowska, I., & Idczak, P. (2018b). Ocena dopasowania projektów realizowanych w ramach ini-cjatywy JESSICA do potrzeb występujacych na obszarach miejskich. Studia KPZK PAN, 184, 233-246.
Nadler, M., & Kreuz, C. (2011). UDF typologies and governance structures in the context of JESSICA implementation. Brussels. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_ policy/archive/funds/ 2007/jjj/doc/pdf/jessica/udf_typologies.pdf on October 15, 2018.
Nadler, M., & Nadler, C. (2018). Promoting investment in sustainable urban development with JESSICA: Outcomes of a new EU policy initiative. Urban Studies, 55(9), 1839-1858. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017702815
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/ on November 1, 2018.
Tarnawska, K., & Rosiek, J. (2015). The Jessica Initiative: An Instrument for Urban Sustainable Development. Examples of Urban Regeneration in Silesia (Poland) and Central Moravia (Czech Republic) / Inicjatywa Jessica Jako Instrument Wspierania Zrównoważonego Rozwoju Miast. Przykłady Rewita. Comparative Economic Research, 18(2), 119-138. https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2015-0015
Wasserstein, R.L., & Lazar, N.A. (2016). The ASA’s Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are asked to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) only the final version of the article, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). We advise using any of the following research society portals: