Digital Marketing Communication from the Perspective of Individual Consumers: A Cross-Country Comparison



Objective: The main objective of this article is to identify social media (SM) usage in communication between individual consumers and producers in different countries. The considerations in the article are focused on consumers’ perspective.

Research Design & Methods: The article takes a deductive approach and the aim is to answer two research questions: For what purpose do consumers communicate with companies via SM? Does the frequency of using the most popular SM in the researched countries influence the range of using them in marketing communication? Three research techniques were used in the exploratory empirical study: FGI (pilot study), PAPI and CAWI (main study). The analysis is based on both literature studies and empirical data, collected in several countries (China, Poland, Turkey, the United States).

Findings: Results of the exploratory study showed that consumers from the researched countries communicate via SM with producers for different purposes. Some of them look for discounts and information about a product or brand, whilst others also take into account adverts presented by companies on SM, as well as information about company events.

Implications & Recommendations: As a result, the findings can be utilised by numerous different groups of stakeholders (such as companies and institutions), in particular companies using SM for marketing communication in foreign markets. The results showed the way of using social media by consumers and that is why they can be advice for producers how to use them in the communication with their customers.

Contribution & Value Added: The content of the article is significant, up to date, and original due to the fact that it focuses on current marketing communication issues.



communication; social media; consumers; cross-cultural comparison

Bachleda, C., & Berrada-Fathi, B. (2016). Is negative eWOM more influential than negative eWOM?. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 26(1), 109-132.

Balaji, M.S., Khong, K.W., & Chong, A.Y.L. (2016). Determinants of negative word-of-mouth com-munication using social networking sites. Information & Management, 53(4), 528-540. 10.1016/

Barreto, A.M. (2013), Do users look at banner ads on Facebook?. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 7(2), 119-139.

Branthwaite, A., & Patterson, S. (2011). The power of qualitative research in the era of

social media. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 14(4), 430-440.

Brewer, P., & Venaik, S. (2012). On the misuse of national culture dimensions. International Market-ing Review, 29(6), 673-683.

Cabosky, J. (2016). Social media opinion sharing: beyond volume. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(3), 172-181.

Chandler, J., & Chen, S. (2015). Prosumer motivations in service experiences. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 25(2), 220-239,

Chau, P.Y.K., Cole, M., Massey, A.P., Montoya-Weiss, M., & O’Keefe, R.M. (2002). Cultural differ-ences in the online behavior of consumers. Communications of the ACM. 45(10), 138-143.

Chiang, H-S., & Hsiao, K-L. (2015). YouTube stickiness: the needs, personal, and environmental perspective. Internet Research, 25(1), 85-106.

Chu, S.-Ch., & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47-75.

Chung, J.Y. (2017). Online friendships in a hospitality exchange network: a sharing economy per-spective. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(12), 3177-3190.

Craig, C.S., & Douglas, S.P. (2006). Beyond national culture: implications of cultural

dynamics for consumer research. International Marketing Review, 23(3), 322-342.

Davies, J., Musango, J.K., & Brent, A.C. (2016). A systems approach to understanding the effect of Facebook use on the quality of interpersonal communication. Technology in Society, 44, 55-65.

De Mooij, M. (2013). On the misuse and misinterpretation of dimensions of national culture. Inter-national Marketing Review, 30(3), 253-261.

Duffett, R.G. (2017). Influence of social media marketing communications on young consumers’ attitudes. Young Consumers, 18(1), 19-39.

Erkan, I., & Evans, CH. (2016). The influence of eWOM on social media on consumers’ purchase intentions: An extended approach to information adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 47-55.

Finne, Å., & Grönroos, Ch. (2017). Communication-in-use: customer-integrated marketing commu-nication. European Journal of Marketing, 51(3), 445-463.

Floreddu, P.B., & Cabiddu, F. (2016). Social media communication strategies. Journal of Services Marketing, 30(5), 490-503.

Furner, C.P., & George, J.F., (2012). Cultural determinants of media choice for deception. Comput-ers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1427-1438.

Ghezzi, A., & Dramitinos, M. (2016). Towards a Future Internet infrastructure: Analyzing the mul-tidimensional impacts of assured quality Internet interconnection. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 613-630.

Gvili, Y., & Levy, S. (2018). Consumer engagement with eWOM on social media: the role of social capital. Online Information Review, 42(4), 482-505.

Grégoire, Y., Salle, A., & Tripp, T.M. (2014). Managing social media crises with your

customers: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Business Horizons, 58(2), 173-182.

Hamid S., Waycott J., Kurnia S., & Chang S. (2015). Understanding students’ perceptions of the benefits of online social networking use for teaching and learning. The Internet and Higher Ed-ucation, 26, 1-9.

Haythornthwaite, C., Wellman, B., & Garton, L. (1998). Work and communication via computer-mediated communication. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.), Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications (pp. 199-226). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

He, W., Wang, F-K., & Akula, V. (2017). Managing extracted knowledge from big social media data for business decision making. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(2), 275-294,

Ho, Ch.-W. (2014). Consumer behaviour on Facebook : Does consumer participation bring positive consumer evaluation of the brand?. EuroMed Journal of Business, 9(3), 252-267.

Hofacker, Ch.F., Malthouse, E.C., & Sultan, F. (2016). Big Data and consumer behavior: imminent opportunities. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(2), 89-97.

Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill USA.

Hsu, M.-H., Tien, S.-W., Lin, H.-Ch., & Chang, Ch.-M. (2015). Understanding the roles of cultural differences and socio-economic status on social media continuance intention. Information Technology & People, 28(1), 224-241.

Hüther, M. (2016). Digitalisation: An engine for structural change – A challenge for economic policy, IW Policy Paper, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft Köln,·15, Retrieved from: ttps://

Kemp, S. (2017). Digital in 2017: Global Overview We Are Social’s. Retrieved from

Kemp, S. (2018). Digital in 2018: World`s internet users pass the 4 billion mark. Retrieved from:

Khan, G.F., & Vong, S. (2014). Virality over YouTube: an empirical analysis. Internet Research, 24(5), 629-647.

Kim, K.S., Sin, S.C.J., & Tsai, T.I. (2014). Individual Differences on social media Use for Information Seeking. The Journal of Academic Libriarianship, 40, 171-178.

Kim, E., Lin, J.S., & Sung, Y. (2013). To app or not to app: engaging consumers via branded mobile apps. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 13(1), 53-65.

Kim, Y., Sohn, D., & Choi, S. (2011). Cultural differences in motivations for using social network sites: a comparative study of American and Korean college students. Computers in Human Be-haviour, 27(1), 365-372.

Ko, H., Roberts, M.S., & Cho, C. (2006). Cross-cultural differences in motivations and perceived interactivity: A comparative study of American and Korean internet users. Journal of Current Is-sues and Research in Advertising, 28(2), 93-104.

Kucukemiroglu, S., & Kara, A. (2015). Online word-of-mouth communication on social networking sites: An empirical study of Facebook users. International Journal of Commerce and Manage-ment, 25(1), 2-20.

Kusumasondjaja, S. (2018). The roles of message appeals and orientation on social media brand communication effectiveness: An evidence from Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 30(4), 1135-1158.

Lin, K-Y., & Lu, H-P. (2015). Predicting mobile social network acceptance based on mobile value and social influence. Internet Research, 25(1), 107-130.

Ludwig, S., & De Ruyter, K. (2016). Decoding social media speak: developing a speech act theory research agenda. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(2), 124-134.

Mangold, W.G., & Faulds, D.J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business Horizons, 52(4), 357-365.

Mazurek, G., Korzyński, P., & Górska, A. (2019). Social Media in the Marketing of Higher Educatio Institutions in Poland: Preliminary Empirical Studies. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review,7(1), 117-133.

Niedermeier, K.E., Wang, E., & Zhang, X. (2016). The use of social media among business-to-business sales professionals in China: How social media helps create and solidify guanxi rela-tionships between sales professionals and customers. Journal of Research in Interactive, Mar-keting, 10(1), 33-49.

Rochlin, N. (2017). Fake news: belief in post-truth. Library Hi Tech, 35(3), 386-392.

Ruleman, A.B. (2012). Social media at the university: a demographic comparison. New Library World, 113(7/8), 316-332.

Short, J.A., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunication. John Wiley & Sons, London.

Smith, P.R., & Zook, Z. (2016). Marketing Communications: Offline and Online Integration, Egage-ment and Analytics, Kogan Page Publ.

Suzuki, S., & Takemura, K. (2013). Culture and Social Media: Exploration of Differences Between the United States and Japan. Advanced Series in Management, 11, 245-258.

Taiminen, H.M., & Karjaluoto, H. (2015). The usage of digital marketing channels on SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 22(4), 633-651.

Tafesse, W., & Wien, A. (2018). Using message strategy to drive consumer behavioral engagement on social media. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 35(3), 241-253.

Valos, M.J., Habibi, F.H., Casidy, R., Driesener, C.B., & Maplestone, V.L. (2016). Exploring the inte-gration of social media within integrated marketing communication frameworks. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 34(1), 19-40.

Walther, J.B. (1996). Computer-Mediated Communication. Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyper-personal Interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43.

Wang, T., Yeh, R.K-J., Chen, Ch., & Tsydypov, Z. (2016). What drives electronic word-of-mouth on social networking sites? Perspectives of social capital and self-determination. Telematics and Informatics, 33(4), 1034-1047.

Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013), Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications ap-proach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(4), 362-369. 10.1108/QMR-06-2013-0041

Wijaya, A. (2017). Role of Experience in Customer Self-Congruity to Maintaining Loyalty: A Study on Fashion Store. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(3), 189-198.

Zhang, L., & Hao, X. (2018). The Impact of Political Relations on China’s Outward Direct Investment. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 6(4), 11-26.

Published : 2019-09-30

Bartosik-PurgatM. (2019). Digital Marketing Communication from the Perspective of Individual Consumers: A Cross-Country Comparison. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(3), 205-220.

Małgorzata Bartosik-Purgat
Poznań University of Economics and Business  Poland

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are asked to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) only the final version of the article, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). We advise using any of the following research society portals:

Most read articles by the same author(s)