Ethical Conduct in Business Organisations: The Opinion of Management Students in Gauteng
This study investigates the perceptions that business and management students have towards ethical practices of businesses organisations in terms of the environment, their employees, community, regulators and competition.
This study employed an exploratory survey design to collect primary data via a self-administered questionnaire. Data were collected from 251 business and management students at a national university in Gauteng, South Africa. Apart from reliability statistics and descriptive statistics, one sample t-tests were employed to test stated hypotheses.
The findings showed that students perceived certain aspects of organisations’ ethical conduct in a relatively negative light.
As the study concluded that business and management student perceived the ethical conduct of business organisations in a somewhat negative light, organisations should take heed and better outwardly promote the interests of all stakeholders.
As more than 75% of the students surveyed had working experience, they represent also the opinion of people in the working world. This study reiterates the fact that what whilst organisations profess to act ethically, this does not necessarily seem to be the case. As more research on this issue reaches the same conclusion, this groundswell should effect change in due course.
business ethics; corporate citizenship; exploratory research; ethical conduct; stakeholder theory
Abratt, R., Bendixen, A., & Drop, K. (1999). Ethical perceptions of South African retailers: management and sales personnel. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 27(2), 91-105.
Baker, M. (2011). [online] Corporate social responsibility. Retrieved on January 27, 2011 from: <http://www.mallenbaker.net.csr/ definition/php>.
Bradley, G., & Schrom, D. (2004). Can we use science to know our ends? Bioscience, 54(4), 284-285.
Brandl, P., & Maguire, M. (2002). Codes of ethics: a primer on their purpose, development, and use. Journal for Quality & Participation, 25(4), 8-12.
Carrol, A.B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268-295.
Clark, K. (2006). Who are you listening to? Chain Store Age, 82(6), 32-35.
Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2003). Business Research: A Practical Guide for Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students. Hampshire: Palgrave-McMillan.
Cohen, J.W. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dart, L. (2004). What is Ethics? PA Times, 27(1), 4-6.
Emory, C.W., & Cooper, D.R. (1991). Business Research Methods. Boston: Irwin.
Freeman, R., & Evan, W. (1993). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian Capitalism. In T. Beauchamp, & N. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business (pp. 97-106). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 122-126.
Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2009). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1-2), 51-71.
Goodpaster, K.E. (1993). Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. In T.I. White (Ed.), Business Ethics: a Philosophical Reader (pp. 205-220). New York: MacMillan.
Griseri, P., & Seppala, N. (2010). Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility. Hampshire: Cengage.
Grobler, P., Warnich, S., Carrell, M.R., Elbert, N.F., & Hatfield, R.D. (2006). Human Resource Management in South Africa. London: Thomson.
Harvey, E. (2002). Ethics Agents. Executive Excellence, 19(12): 18.
Hertz, N. (2006). Doing the right thing is good for business. New Statesman, 13(8), 20-234.
Hodgetts, R.M., & Luthans, F. (1997). International Management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kennexa Research Institute (2010). [online] Employees recognise and value corporate social responsibility initiatives. Retrieved on December 1, 2010 from: <http://www.kenexa.com/getattachment /7f1a2e8>.
Lancaster, G. (2005). Research Methods in Management. Burlington: Elsevier.
Lewis, P.S., Goodman, S.H., & Fandt, P.M. (1998). Management: Challenges in the 21st Century. Cincinnati: South Western.
Monaghan, E. (2005). Dear “E”. New Mexico Business Journal, 29(1), 28-29.
Nieman, G., & Bennett, A. (2006). Business management: A Value Chain Approach. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survival Manual. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Paramasivan, T. (2010). [online] Sustainable reporting. Retrieved on January 25, 2011: from <http://www.experiencefestival.com/wp/ article/sustainability-reporting>.
Pastore, J.M. (2003). What's right? What's wrong? Ask a child. Fairfield County Business Journal, 42(41), 46-50.
Rosenstand, N. (2005). The Moral of the Story: An Introduction to Ethics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rushton, K. (2002). Business ethics: a sustainable approach. Business Ethics: A European Review, 11(2), 137-139.
Rossouw, D., & Van Vuuren, L. (2006). Business Ethics. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
Samuelson, J.F. (2004). Going Beyond Business Ethics. Business & Economic Review, 50(4), 7-10.
Scheepers, M.J., Bloom, J.Z., & Hough, J. (2008). The development of an instrument to assess the enacted environment for corporate entrepreneurship in South Africa. Management Dynamics, 17(4), 2-17.
Simms, J. (2006). The principles of profit. Director, 59(10), 22-24.
Thompson, A.A., Strickland, A.J., & Gamble, J.E. (2007). Crafting and Executing Strategy: Text and Readings. Boston: Irwin.
Van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of corporate sustainability, Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2), 95-105.
Volberda, H.W., Morgan, R.E., Reinmoeller, P., Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., & Hoskisson, R.E. (2011). Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization. Hampshire: Cengage.
Waddell, S. (2000). A "win-win" role for civil society in business strategy. Journal for Non-profit Management, 4(1), 24-43.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are asked to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) only the final version of the article, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). We advise using any of the following research society portals: