The Monetary and Non-Monetary Aspects of Poverty in Poland and Slovakia


Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present the level of poverty risk of households in Polish and Slovak society in two aspects: monetary and non-monetary.

In this study, to evaluate poverty risk in these dimensions, there were used estimated values of the poverty risk function for each household in an integrated, relative and fuzzy approach. This feature has been calibrated to reflect the overall results of the assessment of poverty in the classical approach using relative and subjective methods of determining the poverty line.

The research found that there were differences in poverty risk both within national communities and the studied countries. Such two-way diversity of impoverishment was observed primarily in the classification of households due to the demographic composition of the household.

There is a need for a broader study of diversity i.a. the structure of poverty, its level, dynamics and factors determining it in both countries. This wide research project may help to answer the question of changes in the evolution of poverty in Slovakia after its accession to the Eurozone, which is extremely important in the context of the Polish accession to the zone.

The originality of the work is manifested primarily in a comparative study of poverty risk for communities of the two countries: Poland and Slovakia, which allowed observing differences in the risk in a cross-country system.


Keywords

poverty; poverty measurement; low income; multidimensional and fuzzy approach; comparative analysis

Abel-Smith, B., & Townsend, P. (1965). The poor and the poorest. Occasional Papers on Social Administration, 17.

Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 476-487.

Atkinson, A.B. (1983). The Economics of Inequality, 2nd edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Atkinson, A.B. (2003). Multidimensional deprivation: contrasting social welfare and counting approaches. Journal of Economic Inequality, 1, 51-65.

Betti, G., & Verma, V. (1999). Measuring the Degree of Poverty in a Dynamic and Comparative Context: A Multi-dimensional Approach Using Fuzzy Set Theory. Lahore, Pakistan: Proceedings ICCS-VI, 11, 289-301.

Betti, G., Cheli, B., Lemmi, A., & Verma, V. (2006). On the construction of fuzzy measures for the analysis of poverty and social exclusion. Statistica & Applicazioni, 4(1), 77-97.

Cerioli, A., & Zani, S. (1990). A fuzzy approach to the measurement of poverty. In C. Dagum (Ed.), Income and wealth distribution, inequality and poverty (pp. 272-284). Berlin: Springer Verlag.

Cheli, B., & Lemmi A. (1995). A totally fuzzy and relative approach to the multidimensional analysis of poverty. Economic Notes, 24(1), 115-134.

Desai, P. (1995). Poverty, Famine and Economic Development. Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

Foster, J.E. (1998). What is poverty and who are the poor? Redefinition for the United States in the 1990s, absolute versus relative poverty. American Economic Review, 88(2), 335-341.

Goethart, T., Halberstadt, V., Kapteyn, A., & Van Praag, B.M.S. (1977). The poverty line, concept and measurement. The Journal of Human Resources, 12, 503-520.

GUS (2014a), Incomes and Living Conditions of the Population in Poland (report from the EU-SILC survey of 2012), Warsaw: GUS.

GUS (2014b), Yearbook of Labour Statistics, Warsaw: GUS.

Panek, T. (2011). Ubóstwo, wykluczenie społeczne i nierówności. Teoria i praktyka pomiaru. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.

Ravallion, M. (2012). Poor or Just Feeling Poor? On Using Subjective Data in Measuring Poverty. Washington DC: World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper no. 5968.

Sen, A. (1992). Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Subramanian, S. (2004). Indicators on Inequality and Poverty. Helsinki: World Institute for Development Economics Research, United Nations University, Research Paper No. 2004/25.

Topińska, I. (2008). Kierunki zmian w statystyce ubóstwa. In I. Topińska (Ed.), Pomiar ubóstwa. Zmiany koncepcji i ich znaczenie (pp. 8-26). Warszawa: Instytut Pracy i Spraw Socjalnych.

Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom. A Survey of Household Resources and Living Standard. London: Allen Lane and Penguin Books.

World Bank. (1990). World Development Report. Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.

Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353.

Download

Published : 2015-05-05


Ulman, P., & Šoltés, E. (2015). The Monetary and Non-Monetary Aspects of Poverty in Poland and Slovakia. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 3(1), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2015.030105

Paweł Ulman  ulmanp@uek.krakow.pl
Cracow University of Economics  Poland
Erik Šoltés 
University of Economics in Bratislava  Slovakia




Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are asked to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) only the final version of the article, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). We advise using any of the following research society portals:


Most read articles by the same author(s)