Government Incentives and FDI inflow into R&D – The Case of Visegrad Countries

Abstract

The aim of this article is to identify and compare the efforts of the Visegrad countries in order to attract more foreign capital to the R&D sector.

The study is based on the Eurostat’s and OECD’s data. Considerations about government incentives are based on information gathered by individual foreign investment promotion agencies. The countries included the study are the following: Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia and Poland.

The countries of the Visegrad Group are perfect example of competition in attracting foreign investors. In these countries a dynamic growth of foreign participation in the financing of research and development, as well as a growing number of emerging international research centres has been observed. Among the many conditions that shape the investment environment and inflow of investment, the public R&D support is seen as a major factor. 

Inflows of foreign direct investment in research and development has increased substantially during the last years. In the recent years increased competition can be observed among different countries in attempt for providing attractive conditions for potential foreign investors in research and development (R&D) sector.

The role of governmental policies is important to build an economic, institutional and business environment to attract foreign investors and their R&D activities. The analysis suggests that investment incentives introduced by Visegrad countries are not sufficient for FDI inflows to the R&D.

Keywords

R&D, policy incentives, FDI, investment promotion agencies, V4

Author Biography

Magdalena Owczarczuk

Assistant lecturer at the Department of Political Economics of the Faculty of Economics and Management of the University of Białystok (Poland).

References

1. Ambroziak, Ł., 2013, Wpływ bezpośrednich inwestycji zagranicznych na handel wewnątrzgałęziowy państw Grupy Wyszehradzkiej, IBRKK, Warszawa.
2. Bočková, N., 2013, ‘Visegrad Four Countries: Evaluation in R&D Sectors of Performance’, Acta Universitatis Agriculture et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, vol. LXI, no. 4, pp. 873‐880.
3. Chaminade, C. & Vang, J., 2006, Globalization of Knowledge Production and Regional Innovation Policy: Supporting Specialized Hubs in Developing Countries, CIRCLE Electronic Working Paper 2006/15.
4. CZECHINVEST, Available from: http://www.czechinvest.org/ (accessed December 2013).
5. Deloitte, 2013, Przegląd zachęt na działalność B+R na świecie w 2013 r., Deloitte Global Services Limited.
6. Dunning, J., 1993, Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Wokingham, England and Reading Mass: Addison Wesley.
7. Dunning, J. & Lundan, S., 2008, Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Second Edition, Edward Elgar Publishing.
8. Dunning, J. & Narula R., 2000, ‘Industrial Development, Globalization and Multinational Enterprises: New Realities for Developing Countries’, Oxford Development Studies, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 141‐167.
9. Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), 2004, Scattering the seeds of invention. The globalization of research and development, The Economist Intelligence Unit, London.
10. Eurostat, 2013, Eurostat Database, Available from: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu (accessed December 2013).
11. Ginevičius R. & Šimelytė A., 2011, ‘Government incentives directed towards foreign direct investment: a case of Central and Eastern Europe’, Journal of Business Economics and Management, vol. 12, iss. 3, pp. 435‐450.
12. Guimón, J., 2009, ‘Government Strategies to Attract R&D‐intensive FDI’, Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 34, iss. 4, pp. 364‐379.
13. Havranek, T. & Iršova, Z., 2010, ‘On the Intensity of International Subsidy Competition for FDI’, Theoretical and Applied Economics, vol. 17, iss. 2, pp. 25–54.
14. Harding, T. & Javorcik, B. S., 2011, ‘Roll out the Red Carpet and They Will Come: Investment Promotion and FDI Inflows’, The Economic Journal, vol. 121, iss. 557, pp. 1445‐1476
15. Kuźmińska‐Heberla, A., 2012, ‘Rezultaty działań Polskiej Agencji Informacji i Inwestycji Zagranicznych S.A. w zakresie przyciągania inwestorów zagranicznych w latach 2003‐2010 – próba oceny’, Studia Ekonomiczne, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach, nr 116.
16. Lim, S., 2008, ‘How investment promotion affects attracting foreign direct investment: Analytical argument and empirical analyses’, International Business Review, vol. 17, issue 1, pp. 39‐53.
17. Miyagiwa, K. & Ohno, Y., 2008, ‘Multinationals, Tax Holidays and Technology Transfer’, Japanese Economic Review, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 82‐96.
18. Morisset, J. & Pirnia, N., 2000, The Impact of Tax Policy and Incentives on FDI, Rutledge.
19. OECD, 2013, OECD database, Available from: http://stats.oecd.org/ (accessed December 2013).
20. PAIiIZ, 2010, Sektor badawczo‐rozwojowy w Polsce, Polska Agencja Informacji i Inwestycji Zagranicznych, Warszawa.
21. PAIiIZ, 2013, Available from: http://www.paiz.gov.pl/ (accessed December 2013).
22. Peters, A. & Fisher, P., 2004, ‘The failures of Economic Development Incentives’, Journal of American Planning Association, vol. 70 , no. 1, pp. 27–37.
23. Resmini, L., 2000, ‘The determinants of foreign direct investment in the CEECs. New evidence from sectoral patterns’, Economics of Transition, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 665‐689.
24. Rosenboim, M., Luski, I., Shavit, T., 2008, Behavioural Approaches to Optimal FDI Incentives, Managerial and Decision Economics, No. 29, p.601–607.
25. R&D in Hungary. With Business in Mind, 2010, ITD Hungary.
26. Saggi, K., 1999, ‘Foreign Direct Investment, Licensing and Incentives for Innovation’, Review of International Economics, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 699–714.
27. SARIO, 2012, Invest in Slovakia, Slovak Investment and Trade Development Agency, Bratislava.
28. SARIO, Available from: http://www.sario.sk/ (accessed December 2013).
29. Siedschlag, I., Smith, D., Turcu, C., Zhang X., 2009, ‘What Determines the Attractiveness of the European Union to the Location of R&D Multinational Firms?’, ESRI Working Papers, no. 306
30. Šimelytė, A. & Liučvaitienė A., 2012, ‘Foreign Direct Investment Policy–Friendly Business Environment in R&D Sectors: Baltic States versus Visegrad Countries’, Journal of East‐West Business, vol.18, no. 1, pp. 66‐93.
31. Švač, V., 2010, R&D in Slovakia, Slovak Investment and Trade Development Agency, SARIO, Bratislava.
32. The 2013 Survey on R&D Investment Business Trends, 2013, European Commission, Luxembourg.
33. UNCTAD, 2005, World Investment Report 2005: Transnational Corporations and the Internationalization of R&D, Geneva, United Nations.
34. WEF, 2013, The Global Competitiveness Report 2013–2014, Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum.
35. Witkowska J., 2011, ‘Rola kapitału zagranicznego w modernizacji gospodarki nowych krajów członkowskich Unii Europejskiej. Aspekty porównawcze’, PTE Zeszyty Naukowe, no. 9, Kraków.
36. Worldwide R&D incentives reference guide 2013–2014, 2013, EY Building a better world, EYGM, Available from: http://www.ey.com (accessed December 2013).
37. Zanatta, M. & Queiroz, S., 2007, ‘The Role of National Policies on the Attraction and Promotion of MNEs' R&D Activities in Developing Countries’, International Review of Applied Economics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 419‐435.
38. Zielińska‐Głębocka A., 2013, ‘Sytuacja gospodarcza państw Grupy Wyszehradzkiej w procesie transformacji i integracji z Unią Europejską’. In A. Zielińska‐Głębocka, K. Gawlikowska‐Heuckel (Eds), Konkurencyjność międzynarodowa i regionalna państw Grupy Wyszehradzkiej: Polski, Węgier, Czech i Słowacji, Wyd. UG, Gdańsk.
39. Zhao J. & Wang K., 2009, ‘Analysis of the Technology Spillovers of Multinational Corporations’, Transnational Corporations Review, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 28‐38.