Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2022)
June 2022

Articles - Entrepreneurship

Modelling the interactions among enablers of technology entrepreneurship: An ISM and Fuzzy-MICMAC approach

https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2022.100206

Published 2022-06-17

Shilpa Sindhu
School of Management, The NorthCap University, Gurugram, Haryana, India

Rahul S Mor
Department of Food Engineering, National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Manage-ment, Kundli, Sonepat – 131028, India

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the article is to explore the enablers for technology entrepreneurship and model them into a contextual relationship through a qualitative approach. Moreover, the article presents a guiding framework for adopting technology startup by budding entrepreneurs through modelling the enablers.

Research Design & Methods: Factor analysis was applied to identify the significant factors, and Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) and Fuzzy-Matriced’ Impacts Croises-Multiplication Applique’ and Classment (MICMAC) were used to model the factors.

Findings: It was found that ‘supportive government policies,’ ‘more funding options,’ and ‘intellectual property benefits’ are the three significant driving factors. These factors impact ‘personal interest’ of entrepreneurs through linkage factors and ‘attraction for financers’ as enablers for adopting technology startup by entrepreneurs.

Implications & Recommendations: This research highlights government and policy initiatives’ established role in harnessing innovation and technology growth in any ecosystem. It further propagates that the individual attitude of an entrepreneur towards accepting new ideas for startup based on technology makes a huge difference to the industry. The role of quality investors in promoting technology startup is highlighted.

Contribution & Value Added: This research suggests the roadmap for market players and policymakers to shape the policies and resources so that the budding entrepreneurs get sufficient support and motivation to pursue technology-based startup. The study is unique because it adopts ISM and fuzzy-MICMAC for modelling the factors into a meaningful contextual framework.

       

Keywords

Technology Entrepreneurs, Factor Analysis, Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM), Fuzzy-MICMAC, Enablers

(PDF) Save

Author Biography

Shilpa Sindhu

Dr. Shilpa Sindhu is an Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship and Marketing at the School of Management and Liberal Studies, The NorthCap University, Gurugram, India. She has more than 14 years of experience: five years in marketing and research of agri-products and 9 years in academia. She holds PhD in Business Administration and is ASRB-NET qualified. Her areas of specialization is Marketing with interest in E-commerce, Consumer Behavior, Retail Marketing, Services Marketing and Entrepreneurship. She has to her credit around 25+ research papers published in various peer reviewed national and international journals. She has three book chapters published and a book published with an International Publisher. She has supervised one doctoral research (awarded) and guiding three research scholars in the area of Marketing/Advertising. She has been the key resource person for various sessions in seminars and conferences.

Rahul S Mor

Dr. Rahul S Mor is a researcher of operational design & development, food supply chain, global manufacturing strategies, etc., and currently works as Assistant Professor at the Dept. of Food Engineering, National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management, Sonepat, India. He holds a Ph.D. in Industrial and Production Engineering, specializing in Operations & Supply Chain Analytics. He has authored/co-authored over 50 publications in international refereed SCI, ABDC, ABS ranked journals of high impact factor and Chapters & Conference papers with Elsevier, Springer, Taylor & Francis, IGI Global, etc. His recent research focuses on ‘Supply chain disruptions due to COVID-19, Benchmarking, Performance measurement in food industry, Developing frameworks for food supply chains’, etc.

Dr. Mor is the Area Editor and Managing Guest Editor: Operations Management Research (Springer Nature), Int. J. Logistics Research & Applications (Taylor & Francis); Guest Editor: IEEE Trans. on Engg. Mgmt. (IEEE), Int. J. Transp. Eco.; Associate Editor: Supply Chain Forum: An Int. J. (Taylor & Francis); Editor: Int. J. Supply & Opr. Mgmt. (KU); Editorial Board: J. Dairy Science (Elsevier), Int. J. Cir. Eco. & Waste Mgmt. (IGI), Int. J. Lean Thinking (SU), etc., and a reviewer of many international journals. He is also editing books on ‘Agri-Food Supply Chains’, ‘Industry 4.0’, ‘Circular Economy’, 'Agri-Food 4.0' with Springer Nature, Emerald, etc.

References

  1. Agrawal, A. K., Kumar, D., & Rahman, Z. (2017). An ISM approach for modelling the enablers of sustainability in market-oriented firms. International Journal of Business Excellence, 12(1), 23-45.
  2. Aljuwaiber, A. (2020). Entrepreneurship research in the Middle East and North Africa: trends, challenges, and sustainability issues. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(3), 380-426, https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-08-2019-0123
  3. Allahyary, M. & Meigounpoory, M. R. (2013). New conceptual Model of Technology Entrepreneurship Pro-cess in Nano-food Science-based Technological Firms in Science and Technology Parks. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(11), 284-304.
  4. Asim, S., Li, C., Makhdoom, H. U., & Zafar, Z. (2019). Entrepreneurial Technology Opportunism and Its Impact on Business Sustainability with the Moderation of Government Regulations. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(3), 161-185. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2019.070309
  5. Badzińska, E. (2016). The Concept of Technological Entrepreneurship: The Example of Business Implementa-tion. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(3), 57-72, http://dx.doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2016.040305
  6. Baier-Fuentes, H., Guerrero, M., & Amorós, J. E. (2021). Does triple helix collaboration matter for the early internationalisation of technology-based firms in emerging Economies? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120439, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120439
  7. Bailetti, T. (2012). Technology entrepreneurship: overview, definition, and distinctive aspects. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(2), 5-12.
  8. Bhardwaj, B.R. (2020). Adoption, diffusion and consumer behavior in technopreneurship. International Jour-nal of Emerging Markets, 16(2), 179-220, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-11-2018-0577
  9. Chalmers, D., MacKenzie, N. G., & Carter, S. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and Entrepreneurship: Implications for Venture Creation in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5), 1028-1053, https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720934581
  10. Chatterjee, S., Gupta, S. D., & Upadhyay, P. (2020). Technology adoption and entrepreneurial orientation for rural women: Evidence from India. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, 120236, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120236
  11. Chaudhary, J., & Shilpa, S. (2015). Modeling the Enablers of Innovative Leadership: An ISM Approach. Inter-national Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Management, 4(1), 65-74
  12. Giacon, P. (2008). Rising of the new generation of high-tech entrepreneurs: an exploratory study. In Proceed-ings of the 16th Annual High Technology Small Firms Conference 2008, University of Twente.
  13. Giones, F., & Brem, A. (2017). Digital Technology Entrepreneurship: A Definition and Research Agenda (May 27, 2017). Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(5), https://ssrn.com/abstract=2984542.
  14. Glukhikh, P., & Golovina, A. (2021). Strategies for Creating Technology Businesses by Serial Entrepreneurs as a Source of New Industrialization. In 3rd International Scientific Conference on New Industrialization and Digitalization, Ekaterinburg, Russia, Dec. 12, 2020. 93(01023), https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219301023.
  15. Hassannezhad, Z., Zali, M. R., Faghih, N., Hejazi, R. & Mobini, A., (2020). A Process Model of Entrepreneurial Alertness Among Technopreneurs. International Business Research, 13(3), 1-96.
  16. He, Y., & Pan, J. (2019). The multi-case analysis on the factors of source innovation: based on the ISM. In 2019 10th Int. Conf. on E-business, Management and Economics, Beijing, China, July 15-17, 2019. 45-50, https://doi.org/10.1145/3345035.3345045.
  17. Jafari-Sadeghi, V., Garcia-Perez, A., Candelo, E., & Couturier, J. (2021). Exploring the impact of digital trans-formation on technology entrepreneurship and technological market expansion: The role of technology readiness, exploration and exploitation. Journal of Business Research, 124, 100-111.
  18. Kamarudin, H. S., & Sajilan, S. (2013). Critical success factors of technopreneurship in the creative industries: A study of animation ventures. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 2(1), 1.
  19. Kankipati, A (2017). An Empirical Study on Technology: Entrepreneurship Ecosystem in India. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3144166 on December 21, 2017.
  20. Karyaningsih, R. P., Wibowo, A., Saptono, A., & Narmaditya, B. S. (2020). Does entrepreneurial knowledge influence vocational students’ intention? Lessons from Indonesia. Entrepreneurial Business and Econom-ics Review, 8(4), 138-155, https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080408
  21. Kennett, G., & Sun, H. (2021). Stimulating the Growth of Technology-Based Incubators: Government as Ena-bler, La Trobe. Paper for Greater China-Australia Dialogue on Public Administration November 2019, https://doi.org/10.26181/60091af22a25a
  22. Kumar, S., & Das, S. (2019). An extended model of theory of planned behaviour: Entrepreneurial intention, regional institutional infrastructure and perceived gender discrimination in India. Journal of Entrepre-neurship in Emerging Economies, 11(3) 369-391, https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-09-2018-0089
  23. Kumar, H., Singh, M. K. & Gupta, M.P. (2019). A policy framework for city eligibility analysis: TISM and fuzzy MICMAC-weighted approach to select a city for smart city transformation in India. Land Use Policy, 82, 375-390, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.025.
  24. Maleki, M. M. & Hajipour, B. (2021). Organizational antecedents model of sustainable entrepreneurial ori-entation: multi-case study of Iranian firms. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Ecomies, 13(5), 1173-1191. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-07-2020-0233
  25. Mani, V., Agrawal, R. & Sharma, V. (2016). Impediments to Social Sustainability Adoption in the Supply Chain: An ISM and MICMAC Analysis in Indian Manufacturing Industries. Global Journal of Flexible Sys-tem Management, 17(135), https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-015-0106-0
  26. Maysami, A. M., Elyasi, G. M., Dehkordi, A. M. & Hejazi, S. R. (2019). Toward the Measurement Frame-work of Technological Entrepreneurship Ecosystem. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 27(4), 419-444, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218495819500158
  27. Maysami, A. M., & Elyasi, G. M. (2020). Designing the framework of technological entrepreneurship ecosys-tem: A grounded theory approach in the context of Iran. Technology in Society, 63, 101372, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101372
  28. Meil, P., & Salzman, H. (2017). Technological entrepreneurship in India. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 9(1), 65-84.
  29. Mohanty, M. (2018). Assessing sustainable supply chain enablers using total interpretive structural model-ing approach and fuzzy-MICMAC analysis. Management of Environmental Quality, 29(2), 216-239. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-03-2017-0027
  30. Mollaei, L. & Gelard, P. (2016). The Effects of Research and Development on Technology Entrepreneurship in Small and Medium-Sized Businesses in Iranian Nanotechnology Companies. Journal of Administrative Management, Education and Training, 12(2), 89-99.
  31. Nacu, C. M., & Avasilcăi, S. (2014). Environmental factors influencing technological entrepreneurship: re-search framework and results. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 1309-1315.
  32. Nazarov, M., Butryumova, N. & Sidorov, D. (2017). Development of technology entrepreneurship in a transi-tion economy: An example of the russian region with high scientific potential. DIEM: Dubrovnik Interna-tional Economic Meeting, 3(1), 89-104.
  33. Pathak, S., Xavier-Oliveira, E. & Laplume, A. O. (2013) ‘Influence of intellectual property, foreign investment, and technological adoption on technology entrepreneurship’, Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2090-2101.
  34. Petti, C., & Zhang, S. (2011). Factors influencing technological entrepreneurship capabilities: Towards an integrated research framework for Chinese enterprises. Journal of Technology Management in China, 6(1), 7-25, https://doi.org/10.1108/17468771111105631
  35. Preston, J. T. (2001). Success factors in technology-based entrepreneurship, Massachusetts Institute of Tech-nology, MIT Entrepreneurship Center. Retrieved from: https://www.angelcapitalassociation.org/data/Documents/Resources/AngelGroupResarch/1d%20-%20Resources%20-20Research/31%20Research_Entrepreneurship.pdf?rev=41C9 on March 18, 2021
  36. Roberts, E. B. (1991). Entrepreneurs in high technology: Lessons from MIT and beyond, Oxford University Press.
  37. Rush, H., Bessant, J., & Hobday, M. (2007). Assessing the technological capabilities of firms: developing a policy tool. R&D Management, 37(3), 221-236.
  38. Sage, A. P. (1977). Interpretive Structural Modeling: Methodology for Large-Scale Systems, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  39. Sanjaya, R., Soekesi, A. E., & Sitohang, A. P. (2015). Technology entrepreneurship model development for teachers. International Journal of Technoentrepreneurship, 3(1), 60-66.
  40. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2003). Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue on technology entre-preneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 181-184.
  41. Sung, C. S., Joo, H. J., & Park, J. Y. (2015). Strategies of fostering technology entrepreneurship for the founda-tion of entrepreneurial ecosystem. International Information Institute (Tokyo). Information, 18(5), 1545.
  42. Centre for Internet and Society. (2015). Technology Business Incubators: An Indian Perspective & Implementa-tion Guidance Repor. Centre for Internet and Society, India. Retrieved from: https://cis-india.org/internet-governance/blog/technology-business-incubators.pdf on February 24, 2020
  43. Tripathi, S., & Brahma, M. (2018). Technology Entrepreneurship in Emerging Markets: An Exploration of Entrepreneurial Models Prevalent in India. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8, 24-32.
  44. Venkataraman, S. (2004). Regional transformation through technological entrepreneurship. Journal of Busi-ness venturing, 19(1), 153-167, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.04.001
  45. Villegas-Mateos, A. (2020). Regional entrepreneurial ecosystems in Chile: comparative lessons", Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(1), 39-63, https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-11-2019-0168
  46. Warfield, J.W. (1974). Developing interconnected matrices in structural modelling. IEEE Transactions on Sys-tems Men and Cybernetics, 4(1), 51-81.
  47. Willie O. S., Helen O. A., Abiodun A. E. & Sanni M. (2011). Framework for technological entrepreneurship development: key issues and policy directions. American Journal of Industrial Business Management, 1(1), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2011.11002
  48. Yami, S., M'Chirgui, Z., Spano, C., & Gontier B., O. (2021). Reinventing science and technology entrepreneur-ship education: The role of human and social capitals. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164(C).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.