Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Sources of the Competitive Advantage of Family Enterprises: An International Approach Focusing on China, Nigeria and Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050207

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this paper is to identify some crucial factors influencing family businesses in China, Nigeria and Poland through a prism of the competitive advantage theory as well as company values.

Research Design & Methods: The empirical research results were employed: findings from a survey on competitive advantage, from a study of Family Enterprises’ (FEs) survival in Nigeria, from interviews conducted with the owners of Polish FEs, from a survey with Polish consumers, and from interviews conducted with FEs’ managers in China. International desk research was carried out as well.

Findings: Major attributes of FEs which can support their competitive advantage created on the market were identified. The significance of family enterprises in contemporary economies of China, Nigeria and Poland was examined.

Implications & Recommendations: The success of FEs and their important nature mean that more research is needed to understand their development for the future. A holistic and cross-cultural approach is required. As the consumers’ attitudes towards FEs in the three countries differ ignificantly, a unified survey which can be adjusted for the cultural requirements of each country is recommended.

Contribution & Value Added: While comparing FEs in the three countries, some crucial factors which influence their functioning were discovered. Despite of identified obstacles in performance of FEs, there are some sources of CA highlighted and divided into similarities, differences and autonomous features by the authors.

Keywords

family enterprise, entrepreneurship, competitive advantage, values

PDF

Author Biography

Tomasz Bieliński

Adjunct at the University of Gdansk; Faculty of Economics; Institute of International Business; Department of International Economic Relations;His research interests includeinnovation, entrepreneurship and human capital in China.

Anna Nikodemska-Wołowik

Associate Professor at the University of Gdansk; Faculty of Economics; Institute of International Business; Marketing Department. Her research interests include family business, corporate identity, market research methodology, consumer behaviour.

Ade Otukoya

Lecturer at the University of Northampton, England. His research interests include entrepreneurship, economic development, African economy, accounting.


References

  1. Alderson, W. (1965). Dynamic Marketing Behavior: A Functionalist Theory of Marketing. Illinois. IL:
  2. Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood.
  3. Asaju, K., Arome, S., & Anyio, S.F. (2014). The rising rate of unemployment in Nigeria: the socio-economic
  4. and political implications. Global Business and Economics Research Journal, 3(2), 12-32.
  5. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management,
  6. (1), 99-120.
  7. Barney, J. (1995). Looking Inside Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 17(4), 49-61.
  8. Beckman, T. (2007). The Wroe River: the Canyon Carved by Alderson. European Business Review,
  9. (6), 452-467. doi: 10.1108/09555340710830109
  10. Bednarz, J. (2013). Konkurencyjność polskich przedsiębiorstw na rynkach europejskich na przykładzie
  11. wybranych branż. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
  12. Bertranda, M., Johnsonb, S., Samphantharakc, K., & Schoa, A. (2008). Mixing family with business:
  13. A study of Thai business groups and the families behind them. Journal of Financial Economics,
  14. (3), 466-498. doi: 10.3386/w13738
  15. Bowman-Upton, N. (1991). Challenges in Managing a Family Business. Washington: US Small Business
  16. Administration.
  17. Cai, P. (2015). China’s New Economic Crisis: Keeping the family business. The Asialink Essays, 7(1), 3-4.
  18. Cappuyns, K. (2006). Internationalization of family business through strategic alliances: an exploratory
  19. study. In P.Z. Poutziouris, K.X. Smyrnios & S.B. Klein (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Family
  20. Business (pp. 445-459). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  21. Cheng, Q. (2014). Family firm research – A review, China Journal of Accounting Research, 7(3), 149-
  22. doi: 10.1016/j.cjar.2014.03.002
  23. Chow-Hou, W. (2014). An Integrative Perspective on Guanxi: Dispelling Myths to Facilitate Business
  24. in China. Global Business & Organizational Excellence, 34(1), 51-66. doi: 10.1002/joe.21584
  25. Conner, K.R. (1991). A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought
  26. within Industrial Organization Economics. Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm? Journal of
  27. Management, 17(1), 121-154.
  28. Cruz, C., Larraza-Kintana, M., Garce´s-Galdeano, L., & Berrone, P. (2014). Are family firms really more
  29. socially responsible? Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 38(6), 1295-1316. doi:
  30. 1111/etap.12125
  31. Day, G.S., & Wensley, R. (1988, April). Assessing Advantage: a Framework for Diagnosing Competitive
  32. Superiority. Journal of Marketing, 52(2), 1-20.
  33. Day, G.S. (1984). Strategic Market Planning: The Pursuit of Competitive Advantage. St. Paul, MN:West Publishing Company.
  34. Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504-1511. doi: 0.1287/mnsc.35.12.1504
  35. Edelman Trust Barometer (2014). Edelman Trust Barometer. Retrieved October 6, 2016, from
  36. www.edelman.com/insights/intellectual-property/2014-edelman-trust-barometer/trustaround-the-world/
  37. Emerole, G. (2015, June). Analysis of factors affecting performance of family owned businesses in
  38. abia state, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 17(6), 34-37. doi:
  39. 9790/487X-17613437
  40. EY (2014). Family Business Yearbook. EYGM Limited.
  41. Fadipe, N.A. (1970). The Sociology of the Yoruba. Ibadan: University Press.
  42. Garces-Galdeano, L., Larraza-Kintana, M., Garcia-Olaverri, C., & Makri, M. (2016, March). Entrepreneurial
  43. Orientation in Family Firms: the Moderating Role of Technological Intensity and Performance. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(1) 27-45. doi:10.1007/s11365-014-0335-2
  44. Hall, R. (1993). A Framework Linking Intangible Resources and Capabilities to Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 14(6), 607-618. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250140804
  45. Hoffman, J., Hoelscher, M., & Sorenson, R. (2006, June). Achieving Sustained Competitive Advantage:
  46. A Family Capital Theory. Family Business Review, 19(2), 135-145. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00065.x
  47. Hui-Chen, G., & Huang, M.G. (2012). Confucianism and Chinese Families: Values and Practices in Education, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(3), 10-14.
  48. Hunt, S.D. (1999). The strategic imperative and ustainable competitive advantage: Public policy implications of resource-advantage theory. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(2), 144-159. doi: 10.1177/0092070399272003
  49. Joseph, A. (2014). Culture Determinants and Family Business Succession in Jos Metropolis, Plateau State
  50. Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 5(5), 379-390.
  51. Kachaner, N., Stalk Jr., G., & Bloch, A. (2012). Performance Measurement. What You Can Learn from
  52. the Family Businesses. Harvard Business Review, 90(11), 102-105.
  53. Kramer, R.M., Brewer, M.B., & Hanna, B.A. (1996). Collective trust and collective action: The decision
  54. to trust as a social decision. In R.M. Kramer & T.R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 357-389). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:
  55. 4135/9781452243610.n17
  56. Lambrecht, J. (2005, December). Multigenerational Transition in Family Businesses: A New Explanatory
  57. Model. Family Business Review, 18(4), 267-282. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00048.x
  58. Lansberg, I. (1999). Succeeding generations. Realizing the dream of families in business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  59. Liang, X. (2006). The evolution of township and village enterprises (TVEs) in China. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 13(2), 235-241. doi: 10.1108/14626000610665935
  60. Lyman, A.R. (1991). Customer service: Does family ownership make a difference? Family Business Review, 4(3), 303-324. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1991.00303.x
  61. Man, T., Wing, Y.M., & Fang, M. (2016). Succession in Chinese family enterprises: the influence of cognitive, regulatory and normative factors. International Journal of Management Practice, 9(4), 412-432. doi:10.1504/IJMP.2016.079620
  62. Marques, P., Presas, P., & Simon, A. (2014). The heterogeneity of family firms in CSR engagement:
  63. The role of values. Family Business Review, 27(3), 206-227. doi: 10.1177/0894486514539004
  64. Ming-Jer, C. (2003). Inside Chinese Business: A Guide for Managers Worldwide, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  65. Morgan, R.M., & Hunt, S.D. (1990). Relationship-Based Competitive Advantage: the Role of Relationship
  66. Marketing in Marketing Strategy. Journal of Business Research, 46(3), 281-290. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00035-6
  67. Morris, M.J. (2011). Family Enterprise in the Asia Pacific: Exploring Transgenerational Entrepreneurship in Family Firms. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  68. Narver, J.C., & Slater, S.F. (1990, October). The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20-35. doi: 10.2307/1251757
  69. Newell, P., & Frynas, J.G. (2007). Beyond CSR? Business, poverty and social justice: an introduction. Third World Quarterly, 28(4), 669-681. doi:10.1080/01436590701336507
  70. Nikodemska-Wołowik, A.M., (Ed.). (2015). Report: Poles opinion on Family Businesses 2015. The end of a business shark stereotype. Poznań: Family Business Foundation.
  71. Nikodemska-Wołowik, A.M. (2005). Family Enterprises – a Chance to Create a Strong Polish Business Identity, The Marketing Review, 6(4), 301-316.
  72. Nikodemska-Wołowik, A.M., & Zientara, P. (2012). Family Enterprises in the European Union: A Case For Regional Support. In E. Kotowska, E. Latoszek, A.Z. Nowak & A. Stępniak (Eds.), European Integration Process In The New Regional and Global Settings (pp. 315 – 327). Warszawa:
  73. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
  74. Obayan, A.O.I. (1995). Changing perspectives in the extended family system in Nigeria: implications for family dynamics and counselling. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 8(3), 253-257. doi:10.1080/09515079508256345
  75. Ogundele, O.J.K., Idris, A.A., & Ahmed-Ogundipe, K.A. (2000, April). Entrepreneurial Succession Problems
  76. In Nigeria’s Family Businesses: A Threat To Sustainability. European Scientific Journal, 8(7), 208-227.
  77. Onuoha, C. (2013, April), Challenges and Problems of Professionalizing Family Businesses in South-East Nigeria. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 3(4), 130-139.
  78. Onuoha, C. (2012). Professionalising family businesses in South Eastern region of Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(9), 199-215. doi:10.3968/j.ibm.1923842820120501.1075
  79. Osotimehin, K.O., Jegede, Ch.A., Akinlabi, B.H., & Olajide, O.T. (2012). An Evaluation of the Challenges and Prospects of Micro and Small Scale Enterprises Development in Nigeria, American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2(4), 174-185.
  80. Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: The Free Press.
  81. Porter, M.E. (1996, November-December). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 77, 61-78.
  82. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of
  83. Sociology, 24, 1-24. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1
  84. Prahalad, C.K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
  85. PWC (2014). Up close and professional: the family factor Global Family Business Survey. Retrieved on September 26, 2016, from http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/services/family-business/familybusiness-survey.html
  86. Ring, J.K., Brown, J., & Matherne, C.F. (2017). Family Firms, Stakeholders Relationships, and Competitive Advantage: A Review and Directions for Future Research. In F. W. Kellermanns & F. Hoy (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Family Business (pp. 159 – 174). New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315688053
  87. Rothaermel, F.T. (2008). Competitive Advantage in Technology Intensive Industries. Technological Innovation: Generating Economic Results Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship. Innovation and Economic Growth, 18, 201-225. doi: 10.1016/S1048-4736(07)00007-0
  88. Sharma, P., Chrisman, J.J., & Chua, J.H. (1997). Strategic Management of the Family Business: Past Research and Future Challenges. Family Business Review, 10(1), 20-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1997.00001.x
  89. Shaw, E.H., Lazer, W., & Pirog III, S.F. (2006). Wroe Alderson: Father of Modern Marketing. European Business Review, 19(6), 440-451. doi:10.1108/09555340710830091
  90. Stalk Jr., G. (1988). Time – the Next Source of Competitive Advantage. Harvard Business Review, 66(4), 41-51.
  91. Susanto, A.B., & Susanto, P. (2013). The Dragon Network: Inside Stories of the Most Successful Chinese Family Businesses. New York, SG: Bloomberg Press.
  92. Swire, M. (2015, August 21). China Improves Small Business Tax Incentives, Tax-News, Hong Kong. Retrieved on October 10, 2016, from http://www.tax-news.com/news/China_Improves_Small_Business_Tax_Incentives____68934.html
  93. Wach, K. (2014). The Theoretical Modelling of the Firm-Level International Competitiveness in Business
  94. Studies. In D. Kiendl-Wendner & K. Wach (Eds.), International Competitiveness in Visegrad Countries:
  95. Macro and Micro Perspectives (pp.101-124). Graz: FH Joanneum University of Applied Sciences.
  96. The Economist (2015). To have and to hold, Special report: Family companies – Dynasties. The enduring power of families in business and politics. Retrived on October, 2016 from http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21648639-enduring-power-families-business-and-politics-houldtrouble-believers
  97. The World Bank DataBank (2016). Retrieved on October 20, 2016, Retrived on October, 2016 from http://databank.worldbank.org /data/reports
  98. Wall, K.L., & Preston, J.C. (2010). Action research in the development of a Chinese family enterprise. Organization Development Journal, 28(4), 77-90.
  99. Walsh, G. (2011). Family Business Succession Managing the All-Important Family Component, Who says the family business won’t make it to the next generation? Retrieved on October, 2016 from https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2015/07/3468-succession.pdf
  100. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250050207
  101. Wolf, C. (1955, December). Institutions of economic development. American Economic Review, 45(5), 872-873.
  102. Wu, J. (2005). Understanding and Interpreting Chinese Economic Reform. Singapore: Thomson/South-Western.
  103. Yan, J., & Sorenson, J. (2006). The Effect of Confucian Values on Succession in Family Business, Family
  104. Business Review, Journal of the Family Firm Institute, 19(3), 235-250. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00072.x
  105. You-Li, S., & Ling, D. (2003). Engineering Communist China: One Man’s Story. New York: Algora Publishing.
  106. Zhang, T., & Stough, R.R. (2012). Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth in China. Singapore: WSPC.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.