Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025)
March 2025

Articles

Entrepreneurs’ network characteristics and their perceived success in raising equity: Evidence from the business angel market

Published 2025-03-01

  • Justyna Zygmunt

Justyna Zygmunt
Opole University of Technology

Abstract

Objective: The article investigates the nexus between the characteristics of entrepreneurs’ networks and their perceived success in attracting funding from business angels.

Research Design & Methods: The article is based on a quantitative study. The data source was a survey of 40 Polish early-stage ventures that had secured angel funding. The ventures were identified by searching the Crunchbase database and the websites of Polish business angel groups. Several methods were used in the article: the chi-square test of independence with correction for Yates’ continuity, the one-tail Fisher exact test, and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.

Findings: The research results indicate that network size, contact frequency, and relationship quality are associated with entrepreneurs’ perceived success in raising capital from business angels. It was also found that there are differences in the potential of entrepreneurs’ network ties to contribute to this success. The results prove that more experienced entrepreneurs, in particular, are able to use their networks to facilitate their success in attracting angel funding.

Implications & Recommendations: While networks are generally perceived as beneficial, the article shows that maintaining and developing relationships with specific actors, in particular with business advisors, mentors, external equity investors, as well as lawyers, can be important for the success of a venture when seeking external equity funding. This may provide an incentive for entrepreneurs to strategically build network relationships that are effective and useful when raising capital from business angels.

Contribution & Value Added: While previous studies have not quantified the role that entrepreneurial networks can play in securing angel funding, this article makes an important contribution by providing empirical evidence on how entrepreneurs perceive their networks as useful in meeting their needs when raising equity from business angels.

Keywords

entrepreneur, networks, business angels, equity, Poland

(PDF) Save

Author Biography

Justyna Zygmunt

PhD in Economics, Assistant Professor, Opole University of Technology, Department of Economics, Finance, Regional Research and Quantitative Methods. Her research interests include entrepreneurial finance, business angels, and early-stage ventures.

References

  1. Adler, P.S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134367
  2. Avdeitchikova, S., Landström, H., & Månsson, N. (2008). What do we mean when we talk about business angels? Some reflections on definitions and sampling. Venture Capital, 10(4), 371-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691060802351214
  3. Alexy, O.T., Block, J.H., Sandner, P., & Ter Wal, A.L.J. (2012). Social capital of venture capitalists and start-up funding. Small Business Economics, 39(4), 835-851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9337-4
  4. Antretter, T., Sirén, C., Grichnik, D., & Wincent, J. (2020). Should business angels diversify their investment portfolios to achieve higher performance? The role of knowledge access through co-investment networks. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(5), 106043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106043
  5. Bilau, J., & Sarkar, S. (2016). Financing innovative start-ups in Portuguese context: What is the role of business angels networks?. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(4), 920-934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0304-1
  6. Blaseg, D., & Hornuf, L. (2024). Playing the business angel: The impact of well-known business angels on venture performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 48(1), 171-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587231153603
  7. Bonini, S., Capizzi, V., Valletta, M., & Zocchi, P. (2018). Angel network affiliation and business angels’ investment practices. Journal of Corporate Finance, 50, 592-608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.12.029
  8. Bonnet, C., Capizzi, V., Cohen, L., Petit, A., & Wirtz, P. (2022). What drives the active involvement in business angel groups? The role of angels’ decision-making style, investment-specific human capital and motivations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 77, 101944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101944
  9. Borgatti, S.P., & Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49(4), 432-445. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.4.432.14428
  10. Brown, R., Mawson, S., & Rowe, A. (2018). Start-ups, entrepreneurial networks and equity crowdfunding: A processual perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 80, 115-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.02.003.
  11. Brzozowska, K. (2008). Business angels in Poland in comparison to informal venture capital market in European Union. Engineering Economics, 2(57), 7-14. Retrieved from https://inzeko.ktu.lt/index.php/EE/article/view/11540 on October 15, 2023.
  12. Capizzi, V. (2015). The returns of business angel investments and their major determinants. Venture Capital, 17(4), 271-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2015.1092264
  13. Choi, B.C. (2004). Computer assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) for health surveys in public health surveillance: methodological issues and challenges ahead. Chronic Diseases in Canada, 25(2), 21-7. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15554608/ on March 3, 2024.
  14. Collins, D. (2003). Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods. Quality of Life Research, 12, 229-238.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023254226592
  15. Cowling, M., Brown, R., & Lee, N. (2021). The geography of business angel investments in the UK: Does local bias (still) matter?. Environment and Planning A, 53(5), 1180-1200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20984484
  16. Dalle, J.-M., den Besten, M., & Menon, C. (2017). Using Crunchbase for economic and managerial research. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2017/08, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/6c418d60-en
  17. Daszkiewicz, N. (2019). Internationalisation patterns of polish family high-tech firms. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(4), 147-163. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2019.070409
  18. Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00097-6
  19. Denis, D.J. (2004). Entrepreneurial finance: an overview of the issues and evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(2), 301-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(03)00059-2
  20. Doś, A., & Pattarin, F. (2024). Is sustainability a cost, an obligation, or an opportunity? Evidence on sustainable entrepreneurship orientation from Poland. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 12(1), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2023.120102
  21. Drencheva, A., Stephan, U., & Patterson, M.G. (2022). Whom to ask for feedback: Insights for resource mobilization from social entrepreneurship. Business & Society, 61(7), 1725-1772. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211057497
  22. EBAN Statistics Compendium (2022). European early stage market statistics 2021. Retrieved from https://www.eban.org/statistics-compendium-2021-european-early-stage-market-statistics/ on October 4, 2023.
  23. EBAN Statistics Compendium (2017). European early stage market statistics 2017. Retrieved from https://www.eban.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/EBAN-Statistics-Compendium-2017 on October 10, 2023.
  24. Falik, Y., Lahti, T., & Keinonen, H. (2016). Does startup experience matter? Venture capital selection criteria among Israeli entrepreneurs. Venture Capital, 18(2), 149-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2016.1164109
  25. Florida, R.L., & Kenney, M. (1988). Venture capital, high technology and regional development. Regional Studies, 22(1), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343408812331344750
  26. Freeman, J., Carroll, G.R., & Hannan, M.T. (1983). The liability of newness: age dependence in organizational death rates. American Sociological Review, 48, 692-710. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2094928 on September 21, 2023.
  27. Gao, J., Cheng, Y., He, H., & Gu, F. (2023). The mechanism of entrepreneurs’ social networks on innovative startups’ innovation performance considering the moderating effect of the entrepreneurial competence and motivation. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 13(1), 31-69. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2020-0541
  28. Gargiulo, M., & Benassi, M. (2000). Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organization Science, 11(2), 183-196. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.2.183.12514
  29. GEM (Global Entrepreneurship Monitor) (2023). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2022/2023 Global Report: Adapting to a “New Normal”. London: GEM.
  30. Granz, C., Lutz, E., & Henn, M. (2021). Scout or coach? Value-added services as selection criteria in entrepreneurs’ venture capitalist selection. Venture Capital, 23(1), 5-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2020.1824603
  31. Grilli, L. (2019). There must be an angel? Local financial markets, business angels and the financing of innovative start-ups. Regional Studies, 53(5), 620-629. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1479524
  32. Gornall, W., & Strebulaev, I.A. (2020). Squaring venture capital valuations with reality. Journal of Financial Economics, 135(1), 120-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.04.015
  33. Hayton, J.C., & Kelley, D.J. (2006). A competency-based framework for promoting corporate entrepreneurship. Human Resource Management, 45(3), 407-427. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20118
  34. Heuven, J., & Groen, A. (2012). The role of social networks in financing technology-based ventures: An empirical exploration. Venture Capital, 14(2-3), 131-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2012.659473
  35. Hordijk, A., & van de Ridder, W. (2005). Valuation model uniformity and consistency in real estate indices: The case of The Netherlands. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 23(2), 165-181. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635780510584355
  36. Huynh, T. (2016). Early-stage fundraising of university spin-offs: a study through demand-site perspectives. Venture Capital, 18(4), 345-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2016.1229772
  37. Jaiswal-Dale, A., Simon-Lee, F., Zanotti, G., & Cincinelli, P. (2022). The role of social networking in capital sourcing. Global Business Review, 23(2), 247-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919868867
  38. Jones, O., & Jayawarna, D. (2010). Resourcing new businesses: Social networks, bootstrapping and firm performance. Venture Capital, 12(2), 127-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691061003658886
  39. Kaffka, G.A., Singaram, R., Kraaijenbrink, J., & Groen, A.J. (2021). “Yes and. . ., but wait. . ., heck no!”: A socially situated cognitive approach towards understanding how startup entrepreneurs process critical feedback. Journal of Small Business Management, 59(5), 1050-1080. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1866186
  40. Klyver, K., & Arenius, P. (2022). Networking, social skills and launching a new business: a 3-year study of nascent entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 46(5), 1256-1283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720967063
  41. Ko, E-J., & McKelvie, A. (2018). Signaling for more money: The roles of founders' human capital and investor prominence in resource acquisition across different stages of firm development. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(4), 438-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.03.001
  42. Köhn, A. (2018). The determinants of startup valuation in the venture capital context: a systematic review and avenues for future research. Management Review Quarterly, 68, 3-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-017-0131-5
  43. Kuhn, K.M., & Galloway, T.L. (2015). With a little help from my competitors: peer networking among artisan entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 39(3), 571-600. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12053
  44. Kuzon, W.M., Urbanchek, M.G., & Mccabe, S. (1996). The seven deadly sins of statistical analysis. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 37(3), 265-272. https://doi.org/ 10.1097/00000637-199609000-00006
  45. Landström, H., & Sørheim, R. (2019). The ivory tower of business angel research. Venture Capital, 21(1), 97-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2019.1559879
  46. Lim, K., & Cu, B. (2012). The effects of social networks and contractual characteristics on the relationship between venture capitalists and entrepreneurs. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29, 573-596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-010-9212-x
  47. Lisowska, R. (2016). The potential of business environment institutions and the support for the development of small and medium-sized enterprises. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(3), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2016.040307
  48. Maciejewski, M., Wach, K., & Głodowska, A. (2022). How does networking stimulate the internationalisation of firms in Poland?. Studies of the Industrial Geography Commission of the Polish Geographical Society, 36(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.24917/20801653.361.2
  49. Manolova, T.S., Manev, I.M., Carters, N.M., & Gyoshev, B.S. (2006). Breaking the family and friends’ circle: Predictors of external financing usage among men and women entrepreneurs in a transitional economy. Venture Capital, 8(2), 109-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691060500434072
  50. Mason, C., Botelho, T., & Zygmunt, J. (2017). Why business angels reject investment opportunities: Is it personal? International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 35(5), 519-534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242616646622
  51. Mason, C.M., & Harrison, R.T. (2008). Measuring business angel investment activity in the United Kingdom: A review of potential data sources. Venture Capital, 10(4), 309-330. https://doi.org/13691060802380098
  52. McKeever, E., Anderson, A., & Jack, S. (2014). Social embeddedness in entrepreneurship research: the importance of context and community. In Chell, E. & Karatas-Ozkan, M. (Eds.), Handbook of research on small business and entrepreneurship (pp. 222-236). London: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849809245.00022
  53. Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005
  54. Morris, M.H., Kuratko, D.F., Schindehutte, M., & Spivack, A.J. (2012). Framing the entrepreneurial experience. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(1), 11-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00471.x
  55. Niyawanont, N. (2023). The influence of start-up entrepreneurship and disruptive business model on firm performance. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(1), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2023.110103
  56. Naiki, E., & Ogane, Y. (2022). Human capital effects on fundraising for necessity- and opportunity-based entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics, 59, 721-741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00596-0
  57. Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
  58. O’Reilly, C.A. (1982). Variations in decision makers’ use of information sources: The impact of quality and accessibility of information. The Academy of Management Journal, 25(4), 756-771. https://doi.org/10.2307/256097
  59. Ozgen, E., & Baron, R.A. (2007). Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 174-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.12.001
  60. Pahnke, E.C., McDonald, R., Wang, D., & Hallen, B. (2015). Exposed: venture capital, competitor ties, and entrepreneurial innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1334-1360. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0777
  61. Pasquini, R.A., Robiolo, G., & Sarria Allende, V. (2019). Matching in entrepreneurial finance networks. Venture Capital, 21(2-3), 195-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2018.1457474
  62. Paul, S., Whittam, G., & Wyper, J. (2007). Towards a model of the business angel investment process. Venture Capital, 9(2), 107-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691060601185425
  63. Rasmussen, E., Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2015). The transformation of network ties to develop entrepreneurial competencies for university spin-offs. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 27(7-8), 430-457. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1070536
  64. Reagans, R.E., & Zuckerman, E.W. (2008). Why knowledge does not equal power: The network redundancy trade-off. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(5), 903-944. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtn036
  65. Salancik, G.R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224-253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392563
  66. Scott, A.J., Lévesque, M., & Maxwell, A.L. (2016). The non-compensatory relationship between risk and return in business angel investment decision making. Venture Capital, 18(3), 189-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2016.1172748
  67. Scuotto, V., Del Giudice, M., & Carayannis, E.G. (2017). The effect of social networking sites and absorptive capacity on SMES’ innovation performance. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 409-424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9517-0
  68. Semrau, T., & Werner, A. (2014). How exactly do network relationships pay off? The effects of network size and relationship quality on access to start-up resources. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 38(3), 501-525. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12011
  69. Shane, S., & Cable, D. (2002). Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Science, 48(3), 364-381. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.3.364.7731
  70. Stuart, T.E., & Sorenson, O. (2005). Social networks and entrepreneurship. In Alvarez, S.A., Agarwal, R., Sorenson, O. (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research. International handbook series on entrepreneurship, (vol. 2.) Boston: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23622-8_11
  71. Sobel, M.E. (1995). The analysis of contingency tables. In Arminger, G., Clogg, C.C., Sobel, M.E. (Eds.) Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 251-310). Boston, MA.: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1292-3_5
  72. South, L., Saffo, D., Vitek, O., Dunne, C., & Borkin, M.A. (2022). Effective use of Likert scales in visualization evaluations: a systematic review. Computer Graphics Forum, 41(3), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14521
  73. Stam, W., Arzlanian, S., & Elfring, T. (2014). Social capital of entrepreneurs and small firm performance: A meta-analysis of contextual and methodological moderators. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 152-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.01.002
  74. Stinchcombe, A.L. (1965). Social structures and organizations. In March, J.G. (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142-193). Chicago: Rand McNally.
  75. Stockemer, D. (2019). Quantitative methods for the social sciences (pp. 1-185). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99118-4
  76. Sullivan, R. (2000). Entrepreneurial learning and mentoring. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 6(3), 160-175. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550010346587
  77. Sullivan, D.M., & Ford, C.M. (2014). How entrepreneurs use networks to address changing resource requirements during early venture development. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 38(3), 551-574. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12009
  78. Svetek, M. (2022). The role of entrepreneurs’ perceived competence and cooperativeness in early-stage financing. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 47(6), 2047-2076. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587221127000
  79. Tenca, F., Croce, A., & Ughetto, E. (2018). Business angels research in entrepreneurial finance: a literature review and a research agenda. Journal of Economic Surveys, 32(5), 1384-1413. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12224
  80. van Burg, E., Elfring, T., & Cornelissen, J.P. (2022). Connecting content and structure: a review of mechanisms in entrepreneurs’ social networks. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24(2), 188-209. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12272
  81. White, B.A., & Dumay, J. (2017). Business angels: a research review and new agenda. Venture Capital, 19(3), 183-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2017.1290889
  82. Wierzbiński, B., Zaborek, P., Wosiek, M., & Surmacz, T. (2023). Knowledge management orientation as a driver of competitive performance: Evidence from Polish SMEs in the aviation industry. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2023.110105
  83. Wright, M., Lockett, A., Pruthi, S., Manigart, S., Sapienza, H., Desbrieres, P., & Hommel, U. (2004). Venture capital, capital markets, valuation and information: US, Europe and Asia. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 2, 305-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-004-03131-0
  84. Yousefi Nooraie, R., Sale, J.E.M., Marin, A., & Ross, L.E. (2020). Social network analysis: an example of fusion between quantitative and qualitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(1), 110-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818804060
  85. Zajkowski, R., Safin, K., & Stańczyk, E. (2022). The success factors of family and non-family firms: Similarities and differences. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 10(3), 51-72. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2022.100304
  86. Zhang, J., Souitaris, V., Soh, P., & Wong, P. (2008). A contingent model of network utilization in early financing of technology ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4), 593-613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00244.x
  87. Zygmunt, A. (2022). The effect of research and development personnel on innovation activities of firms: Evidence from small and medium-sized enterprises from the Visegrad Group countries. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 10(3), 105-121. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2022.100307
  88. Zygmunt, J. (2018). Start-ups survival in a transition economy. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Innovation Management, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability (IMES 2018), pp. 1175-1184. ISBN 978-80-245-2274-6, 31 May-1 June 2018, Prague, the Czech Republic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.