Access to sources of stable, sustainable, and modern energy as a goal of sustainable development in the European Union: Are the Scandinavian countries leading the energy transition?

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the article is to classify European Union (EU) member states according to similarity in the area of sustainable development goal 7 (SDG7) of the United Nations (UN) Agenda 2030 on affordable and clean energy.

Research Design & Methods: We conducted a hierarchy of EU countries using the linear ordering method due to the level of achievement of sustainable development goal 7 based on indexes available in the Eurostat database for the years 2015 and 2021. We preceded the selection of the method for ordering objects by applying several procedures (Hellwig method (HELLWIG); Technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS); standardized value Sums method (SSW); zeroed unitarization method (IUCN) proposed in the literature. Next, we used a procedure to support the selection of the method based on the measure of inter-ranking comparisons. Moreover, we singled out high-performing countries and countries that require increased attention and support to facilitate the transition to a greener energy economy.

Findings: The article presents the ranking of countries by level of achievement of SDG 7 in 2021 and 2015 using the IUCN method. The hypotheses that proclaim the Scandinavian countries (Sweden and Denmark) as leaders in the implementation of SDG7 in the European Union and forming the cluster with the highest degree of SDG7 implementation were verified positively. The results obtained for each group of countries indicate strong development disparities among member countries in the area of clean and accessible energy in its various aspects.

Implications & Recommendations: The econometric optics proposed in the study and its results can help classify EU member states in terms of achieving SDG7 for researchers and policymakers. Scholars may supplement the proposed research approach with further measures of clean and accessible energy beyond the SDG7 monitoring indexes. Such indexes could include energy prices, which affect the scale of energy poverty, or the level of greenhouse gas emissions on which environmental well-being depends, among others.

Contribution & Value Added: The study narrowed the knowledge gap on the choice of the linear ordering method for objects, often used in socio-economic research. The use of an original research approach different from previous work for the new timeframe supports filling the research gap in empirical studies concerning the classification of European Union member states in terms of SDG7 implementation.

.

.

Keywords

sustainable development, clean energy , accessible energy , SDG 7, EU countries , classification , typology , sustainable development goal , sustainable energy management

References

1. Agenda 21, United Nations. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf on July 1, 2023.
2. Bointner, R. (2014). Innovation in the energy sector: Lessons learnt from R&D expenditures and patents in selected IEA countries. Energy Policy, 73, 733-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.001
3. Algarni, S., Tirth, V., Alqahtani, T., Alshehery, S., & Kshirsagar, P. (2023). Contribution of renew-able energy sources to the environmental impacts and economic benefits for sustainable de-velopment. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 56, 103098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2023.103098
4. Aydin, M., & Erdem, A. (2024). Analyzing the impact of resource productivity, energy productivity, and re-newable energy consumption on environmental quality in EU countries: The moderating role of produc-tivity. Resources Policy, 89, 104613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.1046133
5. Biernat-Jarka, A., Trębska, P., & Jarka, S. (2021). The Role of Renewable Energy Sources in Alleviating Energy Poverty in Households in Poland. Energies, 14(10), 2957. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14102957
6. Centrum Informacji o Rynku Energii (2023). Denmark – green record in 2022. Retrieved from https://www.cire.pl/artykuly/materialy-problemowe/dania--zielony-rekord-w-2022-r on 24 October 24, 2023.
7. Chirambo, D. (2018). Towards the achievement of SDG 7 in sub-Saharan Africa: Creating synergies between Power Africa, Sustainable Energy for All, and climate finance in order to achieve universal energy access before 2030. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 94, 600-608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.025
8. Chovancová, J., & Vavrek, R. (2022). On the Road to Affordable and Clean Energy: Assessing the Progress of European Countries Toward Meeting SDG 7. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 31(2), 1587-1600. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/142479
9. Coal industry across Europe (6th edition with insights 2017). (2017). EUROCOAL (European Association for Coal and Lignite). Retrieved from https://public.euracoal.eu/download/Public-Archive/Library/Coal-industry-across-Europe/EURACOAL-Coal-industry-across-Europe-6th.pdf on October 15, 2023.
10. Ding, Q., Khattak, S.I., & Ahmad, M. (2021). Towards sustainable production and consumption: Assessing the impact of energy productivity and eco-innovation on consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions (CCO2) in G-7 nations. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 254-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.004
11. Directorate-General for Energy. (2023). Denmark Draft update of the national energy and climate plan. Re-trieved from https://commission.europa.eu/publications/denmark-draft-updated-necp-2021-2030_en on October 10, 2024.
12. Draft updated National Energy and Climate Plan (NECP) for Sweden (KN2023/02494). (2023). Ministry of Climate and Industry Energy unit. Retrieved from https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2023-07/EN_SWEDEN%20DRAFT%20UPDATED%20NECP.pdf on October 5, 2023.
13. Energy Institute Statistical Review of World Energy. (2023). Share of energy consumption by source. Re-trieved from https://ourworldindata.org/energy/country/denmark, on October 24, 2023.
14. Energy policy: general principles (2023). European Parliament. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/erpl-app-public/factsheets/pdf/en/FTU_2.4.7.pdf on October 24, 2024.
15. Eurostat. (2023). Share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption by sector, Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/sdg_07_40/default/table?lang=en, on October 24, 2023.
16. Firlej, K.A., Mierzejewski, M., & Stanuch, M. (2024). Economic Growth in the European Union: The Im-portance of Renewable Energy Consumption. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio H – Oeconomia, 58(1), 95-109. https://doi.org/10.17951/h.2024.58.1.95-109
17. Firlej K.A., & Stanuch, M. (2023). Selected determinants of the development of renewable energy sources in the member states of the European Union. Economics and Environment, 86(3), 89-113. https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2023.86.3.583
18. Firoiu, D., Ionescu, G. H., Pîrvu, R., Cismaș, L. M., Tudor, S., & Patrichi, I.C. (2021). Dynamics of Implementa-tion of SDG 7 Targets in EU Member States 5 Years after the Adoption of the Paris Agreement. Sustaina-bility, 13(15), 8284. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158284
19. Fit for 55: delivering the EU’s 2030 Climate Target on the way to climate neutrality (COM (2021) 550 final). (2021). European Commission. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/?uri= CELEX:52021DC0550 on November 10, 2023.
20. Fostering Effective Energy Transition 2023. (2023). World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Fostering_Effective_Energy_Transition_2023.pdf on November 15, 2023.
21. Frączek, P. (2015). The Modernization of the Energy Sector in Denmark / Modernizacja Sektora Energii W Danii. Archives of Mining Sciences, 60(1), 387-401. https://doi.org/10.1515/amsc-2015-0026
22. Graczyk, A. (2017). Sustainable energy development indicators. Optimum. Studia Ekonomiczne, 4288, 53-68. https://doi.org/10.15290/ose.2017.04.88.05
23. Hellwig, Z. (1968). Zastosowanie metody taksonomicznej do typologicznego podziału krajów ze względu na poziom ich rozwoju oraz zasoby i strukturę wykwalifikowanych kadr (Application of the taxonomic method to the typological division of countries due to the level of their development and the resources and structure of qualified personnel). Przegląd Statystyczny, XV(4), 307-327.
24. Huaman R.N.E., & Xiu Jun, T. (2014). Energy related CO2 emissions and the progress on CCS projects: A re-view. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 31, 368-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.002
25. Huang, P., Lovati, M., Zhang, X., Bales, C., Hallbeck, S., Becker, A., Bergqvist, H., Hedberg, J., & Maturi, L. (2019). Transforming a residential building cluster into electricity prosumers in Sweden: Optimal design of a coupled PV-heat pump-thermal storage-electric vehicle system. Applied Energy, 255, 113864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113864
26. Hwang, C.L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications A State-of-the-Art Survey (Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems). Springer.
27. Ishizaka, A., & Nemery, P. (2013). Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Methods and Software. John Wiley & Sons, Southern Gate, CA, USA.
28. Izonin, I., Tkachenko, R., Shakhovska, N., Ilchyshyn., B, & Singh, K.K. (2022). A Two-Step Data Normalization Approach for Improving Classification Accuracy in the Medical Diagnosis Domain. Mathematics, 10(11), 1942. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10111942
29. Kukuła, K. (2000). Metoda unitaryzacji zerowanej (The method of zero-standardization ). PWN. Warszawa.
30. Kukuła, K., & Luty, L. (2017). Jeszcze o procedurze wyboru metody porządkowania liniowego (Still about the procedure of choosing the method of linear ordering). Przegląd Statystyczny. LXIV(2), 163-176.
31. Latoszek, E., & Wójtowicz, A. (2020). The Energy Sector in Selected EU Member States on the Example of Austria, Germany, Poland and Sweden – Current Status and Development Perspectives. Studia Europejs-kie – Studies in European Affairs, 1(24). https://doi.org/10.33067/se.1.2020.4
32. Le Blanc, D. (2015). Towards Integration at Last? The Sustainable Development Goals as a Network of Tar-gets. Sustainable Development, 23(3), 176-187. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1582https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1582
33. Legnér, M., Leijonhufvud, G., & Tunefalk, M. (2020). Energy policy and conservation planning in Sweden: a longi-tudinal evaluation International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 38(4), 555-572. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-11-2019-0096
34. Lorek, E. (2007). Sustainable Energy Development in International, European and National Dimensions. In A. Graczyk (Ed.) Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development (pp. 163-176), Wrocław University of Eco-nomics, Chair of Environmental Economics, Published by EkoPress, Białystok-Wrocław.
35. Madurai Elavarasan, R., Pugazhendhi, R., Jamal, T., Dyduch, J., Arif, M.T., Manoj Kumar, N., Shafiullah, G., Chopra, S.S., & Nadarajah, M. (2021). Envisioning the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through the lens of energy sustainability (SDG 7) in the post-COVID-19 world. Applied Energy, 292, 116665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116665
36. Mallett, A. (2015). Recasting ‘truisms’ of low carbon technology cooperation through innovation systems: insights from the developing world. Innovation and Development, 5(2), 297-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930x.2015.1049851
37. Marcillo-Delgado, J.C., Ortego, M.I., & Pérez-Foguet, A. (2019). A compositional approach for modelling SDG7 indicators: Case study applied to electricity access. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 107, 388-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.028
38. McCollum, D., Gomez-Echeverri, L.G.-E., Riahi, K., & Parkinson, S. (2017). SDG7: Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for all. In C. Symon (Ed.) A Guide to SDG Interactions: From Sci-ence to Implementation (pp. 127-173). ICSU. Retrieved from https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/14621/1/SDGs-interactions-7-clean-energy.pdf on October 15, 2023.
39. Millennium Development Goals and Beyond 2015. (2015). United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/ on October 15, 2023.
40. Muntean, M., Dănăiaţă, D., Hurbean, L., & Jude, C. (2021). A Business Intelligence & Analytics Framework for Clean and Affordable Energy Data Analysis. Sustainability, 13(2), 638. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020638
41. Neterowicz, J. (2020). Distributed Energy Development in Sweden. Practical Implementation of Sustainable Development Principles Based on Local Resources and Energy Clusters. Energetyka Rozproszona, 3, 9-14 https://journals.agh.edu.pl/er/article/view/4726 on October 3, 2023.
42. Nilsson, M., Griggs, D., & Visbeck, M. (2016). Policy: Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals. Nature, 534(7607), 320-322. https://doi.org/10.1038/534320ahttps://doi.org/10.1038/534320a
43. Olabi, A.G., & Abdelkareem, M.A. (2022). Renewable energy and climate change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 158, 112111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112111
44. Østergaard, P.A., Duic, N., Noorollahi, Y., & Kalogirou, S. (2022). Renewable energy for sustainable develop-ment. RenewableEnergy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.09.065
45. Patterson, W. (2009). Keeping the Lights On: Towards Sustainable Electricity. Taylor & Francis Group.
46. REPowerEU Plan (COM(2022) 230 final). (2022). European Commission. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=%20cellar:fc930f14-d7ae-11ec-a95f-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF on on July 1, 2023.
47. Ring, M., Wilson, E., Ruwanpura, K.N., & Gay-Antaki, M. (2022). Just energy transitions? Energy policy and the adoption of clean energy technology by households in Sweden. Energy Research & Social Science, 91, 102727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102727
48. Rybak, A., Rybak, A., & Kolev, S.D. (2021). Analysis of the EU-27 Countries Energy Markets Integration in Terms of the Sustainable Development SDG7 Implementation. Energies, 14(21), 7079. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14217079
49. Salvarli, M.S., & Salvarli, H. (2020). For sustainable development: Future trends in renewable energy and enabling technologies. In Al Quabeissi, M. (Ed.). Renewable energy-resources, challenges, and applica-tions. IntechOpen.
50. Swain, R.B., & Karimu, A. (2020). Renewable electricity and sustainable development goals in the EU. World Development, 125, 104693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104693
51. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, United Nations. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdfhttps://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf on October 23, 2023.
52. Walesiak, M. (2014). Przegląd formuł normalizacji wartości zmiennych oraz ich własności w statystycznej analizie wielowymiarowej (Review of formulas for normalization of variable values and their properties in statistical multivariate analysis). Przegląd Statystyczny, VXI(4), 363-372.
53. Włodarczyk, B., Firoiu, D., Ionescu, G.H., Ghiocel, F., Szturo, M., & Markowski, L. (2021). Assessing the Sus-tainable Development and Renewable Energy Sources Relationship in EU Countries. Energies, 14(8), 2323. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14082323
54. World Energy Trilemma Index 2022. (2023). World Energy Council. Retrieved from https://trilemma.worldenergy.org/reports/main/2022/World%20Energy%20Trilemma%20Index%202022.pdf on October 15, 2023.
55. Ydersbond, I.M. (2014). Aiming to be Environmental Leaders but Struggling to go Forward: Sweden and Norway on Energy System Transformation. Energy Procedia, 58, 16-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.10.403
56. Zhou, X., Chen, H., Mirza, N., & Safi, A. (2024). Greening mineral resources extraction: A pathway to carbon neutrality through energy productivity and institutional reform. Resources Policy, 91, 104961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104961