The Role of Specialisation in the Export Success of Polish Counties in 2004-2015

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this article is to evaluate the role of specialisation in the export success of counties (powiats) (LAU 1) in Poland between 2004 and 2015.

Research Design & Methods: Using panel fixed-effects regressions with Driscoll and Kraay standard errors, the authors investigate the role of export specialisation and product concentration, as well as comparative advantages on the value of log exports per capita, controlling for other important export determinants.

Findings: Estimations of the panel model bring the conclusion that specialisation in a positive way contributes to the value of exports per capita, assessed at county level. The robustness of the obtained results has been verified by the use of several concentration and specialisation measures, incl. HHI, Krugman specialisation index, weighted RCA and concentration ratio.

Implications & Recommendations:Further research is recommended to capture the consequences of differentiation in the patterns of exports among counties in terms of agricultural vs. industrial goods as well as the low-tech vs. high-tech products. Similar research is recommended to be done at NUTS-2 level in order to inquire into the rationale of smart specialisation(s).

Contribution & Value Added: The main contribution of the research is showing the lumpiness of Poland’s exports at county level in terms of product specialisation and concentration. The value added is depicting the positive role of specialisation for the exports success, understood as exports per capita.

Keywords

internationalisation, regional trade, export specialisation, export concentration, LAU 1, panel

Author Biography

Jarosław M. Nazarczuk

PhD in Economics, Assistant Professor appointed at the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland.

Stanisław Umiński

Associate Professor of the Gdańsk University (Research Centre on European Integration) and the vice chairman of Institute for Development in Sopot, Poland.   

Correspondence to: University of Gdańsk, Research Centre on European Integration, ul. Armii Krajowej 119/121, 81-824 Sopot and Instytut Rozwoju, ul. J. Czyżewskiego 6/1, 81-706 Sopot, e-mail: uminski@univ.gda.pl and s.uminski@instytut-rozwoju.org

Krystyna Gawlikowska-Hueckel

Associate Professor of the Gdańsk University (Economics of European Integration Chair) and the vice chairman of Institute for Development in Sopot, Poland.

Correspondence to: University of Gdańsk, Economics of European Integration Chair, ul. Armii Krajowej 119/121, 81-824 Sopot and Instytut Rozwoju, ul. J. Czyżewskiego 6/1, 81-706 Sopot, e-mail: k.gawlikowska@ug.edu.pl

References

1. Aiginger, K., & Davies, S.W. (2004). Industrial specialisation and geographic concentration: two sides of the same coin? Not for the European Union. Journal of Applied Economics, 7(2), 231.
2. Aldrich, J. (2004). The Discovery of Comparative Advantage. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 26(03), 379. https://doi.org/10.1080/1042771042000263858
3. Altomonte, C., Aquilante, T., Békés, G., & Ottaviano, G.I.P. (2013). Internationalization and
4. innovation of firms: Evidence and policy. Economic Policy, 28(76), 663-700. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.12020
5. Armstrong, H., & Taylor, J. (2000). Regional economics and policy (3rd ed.). Oxford [England], Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
6. Aswathappa, K. (2008). International Business: McGraw-Hill Education (India) Pvt Limited. Re-trieved on October 21, 2017 from https://books.google.pl/books?id=bgLXTW2oq2cC
7. Behrens, K., & Thisse, J.-F. (2007). Regional economics: A new economic geography perspective. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37(4), 457-465.
8. Bernard, A., & Jensen, J.B. (1997). Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Effect, or Both?. Journal of International Economics, 47(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3386/w6272
9. Bos, J.W.B., & Zhang, L. (2013). Room to move: why some industries drive the trade-specialization nexus and others do not (No. RM/13/003). Maastricht, The Netherlands. Retrieved on 21 October, 2017 from Maastricht University School of Business and Economics, GSBE’s website: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/354557/room.pdf?sequence=1
10. Brodzicki, T. (2017). Internationalisation and Innovation Intensities of Polish Manufacturing Firms: A Close Nexus?. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(1), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050106
11. Capello, R. (2016). Regional economics (2nd edition). Routledge advanced texts in economics and finance: Vol. 27. Abingdon, Oxon, New York, NY: Routledge.
12. Cassey, A.J. (2011). State Foreign Export Patterns. Southern Economic Journal, 78(2), 308-329. https://doi.org/10.4284/0038-4038-78.2.308
13. Cieślik, A., Michałek, J.J., & Szczygielski, K. (2016). Innovations and Export Performance: Firm-level Evidence from Poland. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(4), 11-28. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2016.040402
14. Ciuriak, D., Lapham, B., Wolfe, R., Collins-Williams, T., & Curtis, J. (2015). Firms in International Trade: Trade Policy Implications of the New New Trade Theory. Global Policy, 6(2), 130-140. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12183
15. Clerides, S., Lach, S., & Tybout, J. (1996). Is ‘Learning-by-Exporting’ Important? Micro-Dynamic Evidence from Colombia, Mexico and Morocco. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 903-947. https://doi.org/10.3386/w5715
16. Cordes, A., Gehrke, B., Rammer, C., Römisch, R., Schliessler, P., & Wassmann, P. (2016). Identifying revealed comparative advantages in an EU regional context. WIIW research report: Vol. 412. Wien: WIIW.
17. Coşar, A.K., & Fajgelbaum, P.D. (2016). Internal Geography, International Trade, and Regional Specialization. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 8(1), 24-56. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20140145
18. Courant, P.N., & Deardorff, A.V. (1992). International Trade with Lumpy Countries. Journal of Polit-ical Economy, 100(1), 198-210. https://doi.org/10.1086/261813
19. Ďaďo, J., Wiktor, J.W., & Źbikowska, A. (2015). Foreign markets entry motives and strategies of polish exporters. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 18(2), 135-150. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2015-2-010
20. Davis, D.R., Weinstein, D.E., Bradford, S.C., & Shimpo, K. (1997). Using international and Japanese regional data to determine when the factor abundance theory of trade works. The American Economic Review, 421-446.
21. Dixit, A., & Norman, V. (1980). Theory of international trade: A dual, general equilibrium approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Dixon, R.J. (1973). Regional Specialisation and Trade in the United Kingdom: a Test of Some Hypotheses. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 20(2), 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9485.1973.tb00878.x
23. Driscoll, J.C., & Kraay, A.C. (1998). Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549-560. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825
24. Ehnts, D., & Trautwein, H.-M. (2012). From New Trade Theory to New Economic geography: A Space Odyssey. Œconomia. History, Methodology, Philosophy. (2-1), 35-66. Retrieved on Oc-tober 21, 2017 from http://oeconomia.revues.org/pdf/1616
25. Ethier, W.J. (1982). National and International Returns to Scale in the Modern Theory of International Trade. The American Economic Review, 35(3), 77-93. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814590327_0005
26. Foray, D. (2015). Smart specialisation. Abingdon: Routledge.
27. Fujita, M., & Krugman, P. (2003). The new economic geography: Past, present and the future. Papers in Regional Science, 83(1), 139-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10110-003-0180-0
28. Gajewski, P., & Tchorek, G. (2017). What drives export performance of firms in Eastern and West-ern Poland? How smart is England’s approach to smart specialization? A policy paper, 25(12), 2250-2271. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1355890
29. Helpman, E. (1981). International trade in the presence of product differentiation, economies of scale and monopolistic competition. Journal of International Economics, 11(3), 305-340. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0022-1996(81)90001-5
30. Helpman, E., & Krugman, P.R. (1985). Market structure and foreign trade: Increasing returns, imperfect competition, and the international economy. Cambridge: MIT press.
31. Herzer, D., & Nowak-Lehnmann, F. (2006). What does export diversification do for growth? An econometric analysis. Export response to trade liberalization in Bangladesh: a cointegration analysis, 38(15), 1825-1838. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500426983
32. Hewings, G.J.D., & Oosterhaven, J. (2014). Interregional trade models. In M.M. Fischer & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Handbook of Regional Science (pp. 903-925). Springer.
33. Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. Stata Journal, 7(3), 281.
34. Kim, S. (1995). Expansion of Markets and the Geographic
35. Distribution of Economic Activities: The Trends in U. S. Regional Manufacturing Structure, 1860-1987. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4), 881-908. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946643
36. Kim, S. (1999). Regions, resources, and economic geography: Sources of U.S. regional comparative advantage, 1880-1987. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 29(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-0462(98)00010-6
37. Krammer, S.M.S. (2017). Science, technology, and innovation for economic competitiveness: The role of smart specialization in less-developed countries. Technological Forecasting and Social
38. Change, 123, 95-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.028
39. Krugman, P. (1980). Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. The American Economic Review, 70(5), 950-959.
40. Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing Returns and Economic Geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483-499. https://doi.org/10.1086/261763
41. Krugman, P., & Venables, A.J. (1996). Integration, specialization, and adjustment. European Eco-nomic Review, 40(3-5), 959-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(95)00104-2
42. Krugman, P.R. (1979). Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade. Jour-nal of International Economics, 9(4), 469-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(79)90017-5
43. Krugman, P.R. (1991). Geography and trade. Cambridge: MIT press.
44. Lancaster, K. (1980). Intra-industry trade under perfect monopolistic competition. Journal of Inter-national Economics, 10(2), 151-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(80)90052-5
45. Landabaso, M., Gianelle, C., Goenaga, X., González Vázquez, I., & Thissen, M. (2014). Smart specialisation in the tangled web of European inter-regional trade. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(4), 472-491. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-10-2013-0113
46. McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2013). Smart Specialization, Regional Growth and Applications to European Union Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291-1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.799769
47. Melitz, M.J. (2003). The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467
48. Melitz, M.J. (2008). International Trade and Heterogeneous Firms. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137336583.0902
49. Naudé, W., Bosker, M., & Matthee, M. (2010). Export Specialisation and Local Economic Growth. The World Economy, 33(4), 552-572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2009.01239.x
50. Nazarczuk, J.M., & Umiński, S. (2018). The geography of openness to foreign trade in Poland: the role of special economic zones and foreign-owned entities. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series, 39. https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2018-0007
51. Pavcnik, N. (2002). Trade Liberalization, Exit, and Productivity Improvements: Evidence from Chilean Plants. The Review of Economic Studies, 69(1), 245-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937x.00205
52. Pesaran, M.H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1229; IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240.
53. Pietrzak, M.B., Balcerzak, A.P., Gajdos, A., Arendt, Ł., & Tvaronavičienė, M. (2017). Entrepreneurial environment at regional level: The case of Polish path towards sustainable socio-economic development. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(2), 190-203. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.5.2(2)
54. Ricardo, D. (1817). On the principles of political economy and taxation. London: G. Bell and sons. Retrieved on October 21, 2017 from http://www.econlib.org/library/Ricardo/ricP.html
55. Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2005). A Spatial Theory of Trade. American Economic Review, 95(5), 1464-1491. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805775014371
56. Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Glasgow: T. Nelson and Sons.
57. Stefaniak-Kopoboru, J., & Kuczewska, J. (2016). Export specialization in services of the Visegrad countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 11(2), 265. https://doi.org/10.12775/EQUIL.2016.012
58. Torrens, R. (1829). An Essay on the External Corn Trade: With an Appendix on the Means of Improving the Condition of the Labouring Classes. Harlow, UK: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, and Green.
59. Wooldridge, J.M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT press.
60. Zaman, G., & Goschin, Z. (2016). Regional Specialisation Patterns of Romanian Exports. Retrieved on 21 October, 2017 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311518339_Regional_Specialisation_Patterns_of_Romanian_Exports