Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

The Monetary and Non-Monetary Aspects of Poverty in Poland and Slovakia



The purpose of this paper is to present the level of poverty risk of households in Polish and Slovak society in two aspects: monetary and non-monetary.

In this study, to evaluate poverty risk in these dimensions, there were used estimated values of the poverty risk function for each household in an integrated, relative and fuzzy approach. This feature has been calibrated to reflect the overall results of the assessment of poverty in the classical approach using relative and subjective methods of determining the poverty line.

The research found that there were differences in poverty risk both within national communities and the studied countries. Such two-way diversity of impoverishment was observed primarily in the classification of households due to the demographic composition of the household.

There is a need for a broader study of diversity i.a. the structure of poverty, its level, dynamics and factors determining it in both countries. This wide research project may help to answer the question of changes in the evolution of poverty in Slovakia after its accession to the Eurozone, which is extremely important in the context of the Polish accession to the zone.

The originality of the work is manifested primarily in a comparative study of poverty risk for communities of the two countries: Poland and Slovakia, which allowed observing differences in the risk in a cross-country system.


poverty, poverty measurement, low income, multidimensional and fuzzy approach, comparative analysis



  1. Abel-Smith, B., & Townsend, P. (1965). The poor and the poorest. Occasional Papers on Social Administration, 17.
  2. Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 476-487.
  3. Atkinson, A.B. (1983). The Economics of Inequality, 2nd edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  4. Atkinson, A.B. (2003). Multidimensional deprivation: contrasting social welfare and counting approaches. Journal of Economic Inequality, 1, 51-65.
  5. Betti, G., & Verma, V. (1999). Measuring the Degree of Poverty in a Dynamic and Comparative Context: A Multi-dimensional Approach Using Fuzzy Set Theory. Lahore, Pakistan: Proceedings ICCS-VI, 11, 289-301.
  6. Betti, G., Cheli, B., Lemmi, A., & Verma, V. (2006). On the construction of fuzzy measures for the analysis of poverty and social exclusion. Statistica & Applicazioni, 4(1), 77-97.
  7. Cerioli, A., & Zani, S. (1990). A fuzzy approach to the measurement of poverty. In C. Dagum (Ed.), Income and wealth distribution, inequality and poverty (pp. 272-284). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
  8. Cheli, B., & Lemmi A. (1995). A totally fuzzy and relative approach to the multidimensional analysis of poverty. Economic Notes, 24(1), 115-134.
  9. Desai, P. (1995). Poverty, Famine and Economic Development. Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
  10. Foster, J.E. (1998). What is poverty and who are the poor? Redefinition for the United States in the 1990s, absolute versus relative poverty. American Economic Review, 88(2), 335-341.
  11. Goethart, T., Halberstadt, V., Kapteyn, A., & Van Praag, B.M.S. (1977). The poverty line, concept and measurement. The Journal of Human Resources, 12, 503-520.
  12. GUS (2014a), Incomes and Living Conditions of the Population in Poland (report from the EU-SILC survey of 2012), Warsaw: GUS.
  13. GUS (2014b), Yearbook of Labour Statistics, Warsaw: GUS.
  14. Panek, T. (2011). Ubóstwo, wykluczenie społeczne i nierówności. Teoria i praktyka pomiaru. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
  15. Ravallion, M. (2012). Poor or Just Feeling Poor? On Using Subjective Data in Measuring Poverty. Washington DC: World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper no. 5968.
  16. Sen, A. (1992). Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  17. Subramanian, S. (2004). Indicators on Inequality and Poverty. Helsinki: World Institute for Development Economics Research, United Nations University, Research Paper No. 2004/25.
  18. Topińska, I. (2008). Kierunki zmian w statystyce ubóstwa. In I. Topińska (Ed.), Pomiar ubóstwa. Zmiany koncepcji i ich znaczenie (pp. 8-26). Warszawa: Instytut Pracy i Spraw Socjalnych.
  19. Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom. A Survey of Household Resources and Living Standard. London: Allen Lane and Penguin Books.
  20. World Bank. (1990). World Development Report. Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.
  21. Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353.


Download data is not yet available.