Assessing and Comparing Top Accelerators in Brazil, India, and the USA: Through the Lens of New Ventures’ Performance

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this article is to assess and compare the factors influencing the performance of new ventures within top business accelerators across three countries using the Resource Based View (RBV) theory.

Research Design & Methods: The key analysed parameters are funding dimensions, survivability, acquisition, and growth of 1286 new ventures that graduated from the top two accelerators in Brazil, India, and the USA, i.e. countries from developed and emerging economies. Methods we used were machine learning and two independent sample t-tests.

Findings: Input seed funding by accelerators played a dominant role and improved funding trajectories. The external ecosystem was an important differentiator and impacted new ventures’ survivability, growth, and funding outcomes. Capabilities and competencies of accelerators differentiated outcomes within the same ecosystem while external environment dampened accelerator outcomes in emerging economies.

Implications & Recommendations: Accelerators from emerging ecosystems should strive to augment their human capital and network capabilities, including seed funding, while policy-makers should improve ecosystem index values mentioned in this study.

Contribution & Value Added: This is the first of its kind study that extended the RBV theory to accelerators and disentangled the effect of the external environment and RBV on accelerators across three ecosystems with a comprehensive framework of measures. It provides value to practitioners in India and Brazil by highlighting lacunae in their accelerator programs and possible approaches to address them successfully.

Keywords

accelerators, Resource Based View, startups, funding, performance

References

1. Acs, Z., & Armington, C. (2004). Employment growth and entrepreneurial activity in cities.Regional Studies,38(8), 911-927. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000280938
2. Amezcua, A.S., Grimes, M.G., Bradley, S.W., & Wiklund, J. (2013). Organizational sponsorship and founding environments: a contingency view on the survival of business-incubated firms, 1994-2007. Academy of Management Journal,56(6), 1628-1654. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0652
3. Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent.Strategic Management Journal,14(1), 33-46.
4. Battistella, C., De Toni, A.F., & Pessot, E. (2017). Open accelerators for start-ups success: a case study.European Journal of Innovation Management, 20(1), 80-111. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2015-0113
5. Besley, T. (2015). Law, regulation, and the business climate: The nature and influence of the World Bank Doing Business project.Journal of Economic Perspectives,29(3), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.3.99
6. Block, J., & Sandner, P. (2009). What is the effect of the financial crisis on venture capital financing? Empirical evidence from US Internet start-ups.Venture Capital,11(4), 295-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691060903184803
7. Bloom, N., Genakos, C., Sadun, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2012). Management practices across firms and countries.Academy of Management Perspectives,26(1), 12-33. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2011.0077
8. Bøllingtoft, A. (2012). The bottom-up business incubator: Leverage to networking and cooperation practices in a self-generated, entrepreneurial-enabled environment.Technovation,32(5), 304-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.11.005
9. Bosma, N. (2013). The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) and its impact on entrepreneurship research.Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship,9(2), 143-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/0300000033
10. Business, D. (2013). Doing business 2014: Understanding regulations for small and medium-size enterprises.Washington DC. Retrieved from https://www.doingbusiness.org/ on October 15, 2019.
11. Bryl, Ł., & Truskolaski, S. (2017). Human capital reporting and its determinants by Polish and Ger-man publicly listed companies.Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review,5(2), 195. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050211
12. Cacciolatti, L., Rosli, A., Ruiz-Alba, J.L., & Chang, J. (2020). Strategic alliances and firm performance in startups with a social mission.Journal of Business Research,106, 106-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.047
13. Cohen, S., Fehder, D.C., Hochberg, Y.V., & Murray, F. (2019). The design of startup accelera-tors.Research Policy,48(7), 1781-1797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.003
14. Cohen, S., & Hochberg, Y.V. (2014). Accelerating startups: The seed accelerator phenomenon. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2418000
15. Dahms, S., & Kingkaew, S. (2016). University business incubators: An institutional demand side perspective on value adding features.Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review,4(3), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2016.040304
16. De Toni, A., & Tonchia, S. (2003). Strategic planning and firms’ competencies: Traditional ap-proaches and new perspectives.International Journal of Operations & Production Manage-ment,23(9), 947-976. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570310491729
17. Eveleens, C.P., van Rijnsoever, F.J., & Niesten, E.M. (2017). How network-based incubation helps start-up performance: a systematic review against the background of management theo-ries.The Journal of Technology Transfer,42(3), 676-713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9510-7
18. Eugene, L.Y., & Yuan, S.T.D. (2012). Where’s the money? the social behavior of investors in face-book's small world. InProceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2012)(pp. 158-162). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2012.36
19. Gonzalez-Uribe, J., & Leatherbee, M. (2018). The effects of business accelerators on venture per-formance: Evidence from start-up chile.The Review of Financial Studies,31(4), 1566-1603. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhx103
20. Goswami, K., Mitchell, J.R., & Bhagavatula, S. (2018). Accelerator expertise: Understanding the intermediary role of accelerators in the development of the Bangalore entrepreneurial ecosys-tem.Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,12(1), 117-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1281
21. Grant, R.M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation.California Management Review,33(3), 114-135. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166664
22. Hallen, B.L., Bingham, C.B., & Cohen, S. (2014). Do accelerators accelerate? A study of venture accelerators as a path to success?. InAcademy of Management Proceedings(Vol. 2014, No. 1, p. 12955). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2014.185
23. Hart, S.L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm.Academy of Management Re-view,20(4), 986-1014. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280033
24. Hochberg, Y.V. (2016). Accelerating entrepreneurs and ecosystems: The seed accelerator model. Innovation Policy and the Economy,16(1), 25-51. https://doi.org/10.1086/684985
25. Hsu, D.H. (2007). Experienced entrepreneurial founders, organizational capital, and venture capital funding.Research Policy,36(5), 722-741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.022
26. Kanbach, D.K., & Stubner, S. (2016). Corporate accelerators as recent form of startup engagement: The what, the why, and the how.Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR),32(6), 1761-1776. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v32i6.9822
27. Kim, J.H., & Wagman, L. (2014). Portfolio size and information disclosure: An analysis of startup accelerators.Journal of Corporate Finance,29, 520-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.10.017
28. Ko, E.J., & McKelvie, A. (2018). Signaling for more money: The roles of founders’ human capital and investor prominence in resource acquisition across different stages of firm develop-ment.Journal of Business Venturing,33(4), 438-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.03.001
29. Klyver, K. (2008). An analytical framework for micro-level analysis of GEM data.International Jour-nal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business,6(4), 583-603. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2008.019503
30. Lisowska, R. (2016). The potential of business environment institutions and the support for the development of small and medium-sized enterprises.Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review,4(3), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2016.040307
31. Lyles, M.A., Saxton, T., & Watson, K. (2004). Venture survival in a transitional economy.Journal of Management,30(3), 351-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2003.03.001
32. Mansoori, Y., Karlsson, T., & Lundqvist, M. (2019). The influence of the lean startup methodology on entrepreneur-coach relationships in the context of a startup accelerator.Technovation,84, 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.03.001
33. Mayer-Haug, K., Read, S., Brinckmann, J., Dew, N., & Grichnik, D. (2013). Entrepreneurial talent and venture performance: A meta-analytic investigation of SMEs.Research Policy,42(6-7), 1251-1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.001
34. Meschi, P.X., & Riccio, E.L. (2008). Country risk, national cultural differences between partners and survival of international joint ventures in Brazil.International Business Review,17(3), 250-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2007.11.001
35. Murphy, G.B., Trailer, J.W., & Hill, R.C. (1996). Measuring performance in entrepreneurship re-search.Journal of Business Research,36(1), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(95)00159-X
36. Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. (2016). Understanding a new generation incu-bation model: The accelerator.Technovation,50, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.003
37. Penrose, E., & Penrose, E.T. (2009).The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press.
38. Porter, M.E. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy.Strategic Management Journal,12(S2), 95-117. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250121008
39. Radojevich-Kelley, N., & Hoffman, D.L. (2012). Analysis of accelerator companies: An exploratory case study of their programs, processes, and early results.Small Business Institute Journal,8(2), 54-70.
40. Smith, S.W., & Hannigan, T.J. (2015). Swinging for the fences: How do top accelerators impact the trajectories of new ventures.Druid,15, 15-17.
41. Shetty, S., & Sundaram, R. (2019). Funding acquisition drivers for new venture firms: Diminishing value of human capital signals in early rounds of funding.Problems and Perspectives in Man-agement,17(1), 78. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(1).2019.08
42. Van Stel, A., Storey, D.J., & Thurik, A.R. (2007). The effect of business regulations on nascent and young business entrepreneurship.Small Business Economics,28(2-3), 171-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9014-1
43. Uhm, C.H., Sung, C.S., & Park, J.Y. (2018). Understanding the accelerator from resources-based perspective.Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(3), 258-278. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-01-2018-0001
44. Wise, S., & Valliere, D. (2014). The impact on management experience on the performance of start-ups within accelerators.The Journal of Private Equity,18(1), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpe.2014.18.1.009
45. Wong, P.K., Ho, Y.P., & Autio, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evi-dence from GEM data.Small Business Economics,24(3), 335-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-2000-1
46. Xu, S., Zhang, Q., Lü, L., & Mariani, M.S. (2020). Recommending investors for new startups by inte-grating network diffusion and investors’ domain preference.Information Sciences,515, 103-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.11.045
47. Yang, S., Kher, R., & Lyons, T.S. (2018). Where Do Accelerators Fit in the Venture Creation Pipeline? Different Values Brought by Different Types of Accelerators.Entrepreneurship Research Jour-nal,8(4). https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2017-0140
48. Yin, B., & Luo, J. (2018). How do accelerators select startups? Shifting decision criteria across stag-es.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,65(4), 574-589. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/TEM.2018.2791501
49. Żur, A. (2013). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance: Challenges for Research and Practice.Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review,1(2), 7-28.