Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

The Impact of Conflicts in Foreign Business Relationships on SME Performance

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the article is to discuss the impact of conflicts in foreign business relationships on the performance of SMEs. Two possible ways in which conflicts influence the company’s performance are considered: direct (conflicts → company’s performance) and indirect (conflicts → business relationships → company’s performance).

Research Design & Methods: The article uses the case study method and presents the results of a study of 13 SMEs operating in international markets.

Findings: The article proposes a model of the positive impact of conflicts in foreign business relationships on SME performance. A model links relational and operational sources of conflicts with their direct and indirect (through relationships) impact on SME performance and positive and negative outcomes.

Implications & Recommendations: The article provides information how to transform conflicts in foreign business relationships into positive outcomes. A crucial role in this respect is played by moderators: trust and informal relationship development, cultural awareness and formal action development.

Contribution & Value Added: The originality of the study is that it identifies the main operational and relational sources of conflict situations that impact (directly and indirectly) SMEs performance in their international activities. The identified 4 moderators, by positively impacting SMEs foreign relationship in conflict situations, help these companies to obtain positive conflict outcomes.

Keywords

SME, internationalisation, relationship, conflict, performance

PDF

References

  1. Deszczyński, B., Fonfara, K., & Dymitrowski, A. (2017). The Role of Relationships in Initiating the Internationalisation Process in B2B Markets. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(4), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER. 2017.050404
  2. Duarte, M., & Davies, G. (2003). Testing the conflict-performance assumption in business-to-business relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(2), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(02)00223-7
  3. Easton, G. (1998). Case Research as a Methodology for Industrial Network: A Realist Approach. In P. Naudé & P.W. Turnbull (Eds.), Network Dynamics in Marketing (pp. 73-87). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  4. Eisenhardt, K.M., & Graebner, M.E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and chal-lenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10. 2307/20159839
  5. Ellis, P.D. (2011). Social ties and international entrepreneurship: Opportunities and constraints affecting firm internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(1), 99-127. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.20
  6. Finch, J., Zhang, S., & Geiger, S. (2013). Managing in conflict: How actors distribute conflict in an industrial network. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(7), 1063-1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.07.024
  7. Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Retrieved on May 26, 2018 from www.uncg.edu/hdf/facultystaff/Tudge/Guba%20&%20Lincoln%201994.pdf
  8. Lam, P.K., & Chin, K.S. (2005). Identifying and prioritizing critical success factors for conflict man-agement in collaborative new product development. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(8), 761-772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.12.006
  9. Leonidou, L.C., Barnes, B.R., & Talias, M.A. (2006). Exporter-importer relationship quality: The inhibiting role of uncertainty, distance, and conflict. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(5), 576-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.06.012
  10. Lin, X., & Germain, R. (1998). Sustaining satisfactory joint venture relationships: The role of conflict resolution strategies. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1), 179-196. https://doi.org /10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490031
  11. Lumineau, F., Eckerd, S., & Handley, S. (2015). Inter-organizational conflicts. Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation, 1(1), 42-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055563614568493
  12. Marschan-Piekkari, R., & Welch, C. (2004). Qualitative Research Methods in International Business: The State of the Art. In R. Marschan-Piekkari & C. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business (pp. 5-24). Northhampton: Edward Elgar.
  13. Mele, C. (2011). Conflicts and value co-creation in project networks. Industrial Marketing Man-agement, 40, 1377-1385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.033
  14. Musteen, M., Francis, J., & Datta, D.K. (2010). The influence of international networks on interna-tionalization speed and performance: A study of Czech SMEs. Journal of World Business, 45(3), 197-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.12.003
  15. Nordin, F. (2006). Identifying intraorganisational and interorganisational alliance conflicts – A longitudinal study of an alliance pilot project in the high technology industry. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(2), 116-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.12.010
  16. Ntayi, J.M. (2012). Emotional outcomes of Ugandan SME buyer-supplier contractual conflicts. International Journal of Social Economics, 39(1/2), 125-141. https://doi. org/10.1108/03068291211188901
  17. Pangarkar, N. (2008). Internationalization and performance of small- and medium-sized enterpris-es. Journal of World Business, 43(4), 475-485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jwb.2007.11.009
  18. Plank, R.E., & Newell, S.J. (2007). The effect of social conflict on relationship loyalty in business markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(1), 59-67. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.03.012
  19. Rose, G.M., & Shoham, A. (2004). Interorganizational task and emotional conflict with interna-tional channels of distribution. Journal of Business Research, 57(9), 942-950. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00490-3
  20. Skarmeas, D. (2006). The role of functional conflict in international buyer-seller relationships: Implications for industrial exporters. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(5), 567-575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.06.013
  21. Vaaland, T.I. (2004). Improving project collaboration: Start with the conflicts. International Journal of Project Management, 22(6), 447-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman. 2003.11.003
  22. Vaaland, T.I., & Håkansson, H. (2003). Exploring interorganizational conflict in complex projects. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(2), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0019-8501(02)00227-4
  23. Vaaland, T.I., Haugland, S.A., & Purchase, S. (2004). Why Do Business Partners Divorce? The Role of Cultural Distance in Inter-Firm Conflict Behavior. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 11(4), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1300/J033v11n04_01
  24. Welch, C., & Wilkinson, I. (2005). Network perspectives on interfirm conflict: Reassessing a critical case in international business. Journal of Business Research, 58(2), 205-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00495-2

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.