Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2018)
Exporting, International Cooperation and FDI

Other Articles

Success Factors of Start-Up Acquisitions: Evidence from Israel

https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2018.060211

Published 2018-06-15

  • Ofer Zaks
    • ,
  • Jan Polowczyk
    • ,
  • Piotr Trąpczyński

Ofer Zaks
Jerusalem Hadassah college

Jan Polowczyk
Poznań University of Economics and Business

Piotr Trąpczyński
Poznań University of Economics and Business

Abstract

Objective:This article aims to explore the factors behind successful M&A of start-up companies.

Research Design & Methods: The objectives of this qualitative study are pursued in the context of acquired high-tech start-ups in Israel. The study employed semi-structured interviews. The practical model for analysing the transcribed interview responses was based on Shkedi’s (2003) method, drawing also from the grounded theory tradition in the process of coding and interpreting data categories.

Findings: The results of this research highlight the communication climate (comprising factors such as openness, trust, supportiveness and interest of top managers in the employee’s well-being) as a vital behavioural mechanism influencing post-acquisition performance. Also, we found that effective knowledge transfer to the acquired company is one of the essential determinants of success.company is one of the essential determinants of success.

Implications & Recommendations: M&A require a clear business plan, that which is based on realistic needs. A major fault in many start-ups is focus on technology rather than on strategy. Many start-ups are established and staffed by engineers and scientists who often believe, erroneously, that a good product will sell.

Contribution & Value Added: In extant research, most attention has been paid to the acquiring company perspective on success. In contrast, this study focuses on the seller’s perspective and contribution to M&A success, instead of on the buyer’s perspective.

Keywords

start-up acquisitions, trust, commitment, resistance to change, suc-cess factors, firm performance, Israel

PDF

References

  1. Austin, J.E., & Leonard, H.B. (2008). Can the virtuous mouse and the wealthy elephant live happily ever after?. California Management Review, 51, 77-102.
  2. Bauer, F., & Matzler, K. (2014). Antecedents of M&A success: The role of strategic complementari-ty, cultural fit, and degree and speed of integration. Strategic Management Journal, 35(2), 269-291. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2091
  3. Björkman, I., Stahl, G.K., & Vaara, E. (2007). Cultural differences and capability transfer in cross-border acquisitions: The mediating roles of capability complementarity, absorptive capacity, and social integration. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 658-672.
  4. Capron, L. (1999). The long-term performance of horizontal acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 987-1018. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199911)20:11<987::AID-SMJ61>3.0.CO;2-B
  5. Cartwright, S., Teerikangas, S., Rouzies, A., & Wilson-Evered, E. (2012). Methods in M&A—A look at the past and the future to forge a path forward. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 28, 95-106. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.scaman.2012.03.002
  6. Drori, I., Wrzesniewski, A., & Ellis, S. (2011). Cultural clashes in a “merger of equals”: The case of high‐tech start‐ups. Human Resource Management, 50(5), 625-649. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20446
  7. Ellis, K.M., Weber, Y., Raveh, A., & Tarba, S.Y. (2012). Integration in large, related M&As: linkages between contextual factors, integration approaches and process dimensions. European Jour-nal of International Management, 6(4), 368-394. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2012.048154
  8. Elving, W.J.L. (2005). The role of communication in organisational change. Corporate Communica-tions. An International Journal, 10(2), 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280510596943
  9. Giessner, S.R., Viki, G.T., Otten, S., Terry, D.J., & Täuber, S. (2006). The challenge of merging: Merger patterns, pre-merger status and merger support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(3), 339-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205282151
  10. Gomes, E., Angwin, D.N., Weber, Y., & Yedidia Tarba, S. (2013). Critical success factors through the mergers and acquisitions process: revealing pre‐and post‐M&A connections for improved performance. Thunderbird International Business Review, 55(1), 13-35. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/tie.21521
  11. Graebner, M.E. (2004). Momentum and serendipity: How acquired leaders create value in the integration of technology firms. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8-9), 751-777. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.419
  12. Haleblian, J., & Finkelstein, S. (1999). The influence of organizational acquisition experience on acquisition performance: A behavioral learning perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 29-56. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667030
  13. Hurley, R.F. (2006, September). The Decision to Trust. Harvard Business Review, 55-62.
  14. Junni, P., & Sarala, R.S. (2013). The roles of cultural learning and collective teaching initiatives in M&A knowledge transfer. European Journal of Cross-Cultural Competence and Management, 2, 275-298.
  15. Madsen, S.R., Miller, D., & John, C.R. (2005). Readiness for organizational change: Do organizational commitment and social relationships in the workplace make a difference?. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16, 213-233. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1134
  16. Marks, M.L., & Mirvis, P.H. (2001). Making mergers and acquisitions work: Strategic and psychological preparation. Academy of Management Executive, 15, 80-92.
  17. Meglio, O., & Risberg, A. (2010). The (mis)measurement of M&A performance. Copenhagen Busi-ness School Working Paper, Department of International Communication and Management.
  18. Nikandrou, I., Papalexandris, N., & Bourantas, D. (2000). Gaining Employee trust after acquisition. Employee Relations, 22(4), 334-355. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425450010340344
  19. Oberg, C., & Tarba, S.Y. (2013). What do we know about post-merger integration following international acquisitions?. Advances in International Management, 26, 471-494. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21548
  20. Papadakis, V.M., & Thanos, I.C. (2010). Measuring the performance of acquisitions: an empirical investigation using multiple criteria. British Journal of Management, 21(4), 859-873. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00671.x
  21. Piderit, S.K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. The Academy of Management Review, 25, 783-794. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2000.3707722
  22. Puranam, P., Singh, H., & Zollo M. (2002). The inter-temporal tradeoff in technology grafting acquisitions. Working paper, London Business School.
  23. Rahman, A., Civelek, M., & Kozubíková, L. (2016). Proactiveness, Competitive Aggressiveness and Autonomy: A Comparative Study from the Czech Republic. Equilibrium, 11(3), 631-650. https://doi.org/10.12775/EQUIL.2016.028
  24. Ranft, A.L., & Lord, M.D. (2002). Acquiring new technologies and capabilities: A grounded model of acquisition implementation. Organization Science, 13(4), 420-441. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.4.420.2952
  25. Schoar, A. (2002). Effects of corporate diversification on productivity. Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2379-2403. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00500
  26. Shkedi, A. (2003). Words of meaning: Qualitative research-theory and practice. Tel-Aviv: Tel-Aviv University Ramot (Hebrew)
  27. Stanley, D.J., Meyer, J.P., & Topolnytsky, L. (2005). Employee cynicism and resistance to organizational change. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19, 429-459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-005-4518-2
  28. Teerikangas, S. (2012). Dynamics of acquired firm pre-acquisition employee reactions. Journal of Management, 38(2), 599-639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310383908
  29. Trąpczyński, P. (2013). Determinants of foreign direct investment performance – a critical litera-ture review. Oeconomia Copernicana, 2/2013, 117-132. https://doi.org/10.12775/OeC.2013.016
  30. Van Dick, R., Ullrich, J., & Tissington, P.A. (2006). Working under a black cloud: how to sustain organisational identification after a merger. British Journal of Management, 17(1), 569-579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00479.x
  31. Very, P., Lubatkin M., Calori, R., & Veiga, J. (1997). Relative Standing and the Performance of Recently Acquired European Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 18(8), 593-614. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199709)18:8<593::AID-SMJ899>3.0.CO;2-I
  32. Weber, Y., & Tarba, S.Y. (2012). Mergers and acquisitions process: The use of corporate culture analysis. Cross-Cultural Management, 19, 288-303. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527601211247053
  33. Weber, Y., Tarba, S.Y., & Reichel, A. (2011). A model of the influence of culture on integration approaches and international mergers and acquisitions performance. International Studies of Management & Organization, 41(3), 9-24. https://doi.org/10.2753/IMO0020-8825410301
  34. Zaheer, A., Castañer, X., & Souder, D. (2013). Synergy sources, target autonomy, and integration in acquisitions. Journal of Management, 39(3), 604-632. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311403152
  35. Zaks, O. (2016). Acquired firm’s contribution to M&A’s success: Research evidence from the Israeli hi-tech experience. Doctoral Dissertation, Poznań University of Economics and Business.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.