The Social Dimension of the Entrepreneurial Motivation in the Central and Eastern European Countries


Objective: Discovering and categorising the entrepreneurial motivations of university student entrepreneurs in the CEE region, and uncovering the influencing factors behind the different motivation factors. The study focuses on the social dimension of entrepreneurial motivations, so special attention is given to the Social mission factor.
Research Design & Methods: The study is based on the 2016 GUESSS (Global University Entrepreneurial Spirit Students’ Survey) database that contains 19,338 answers for the eight selected CEE countries. Factor analysis was used to detect the motivation factors; descriptive statistics and stochastic relationship tests were used to describe them; a General Linear Model (GLM) was set up to identify the influencing factors of the Social mission, one of the motivation factors of the university student entrepreneurs.
Findings: Five factors of entrepreneurial motivations were identified: Social mission, Customer focus, Competition/market focus, Individual goals, and Collective/community goals. Most of the factors are intrinsic in nature. According to the GLM model the Social mission factor is influenced by education, the entrepreneurship-related courses and programmes, a cultural dimension called uncertainty avoidance, and country-level characteristics that are not cultural in nature.
Implications & Recommendations: According to our findings entrepreneurship courses and programmes influence attitudes and motivations as well, and so higher education institutions should focus on such programmes. The standard entrepreneurial courses do not enhance the importance of intrinsic motivations, such as the social mission, so more emphasis should be put on the social dimensions.
Contribution & Value Added: Our study contributes to the entrepreneurial motivations literature, and calls for further comparative research, as the social mission GLM showed that country-level differences exist in the CEE region. The study also contributes to the literature of social enterprises and social innovation.


entrepreneurial motivation; entrepreneurship; social innovation

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211

Antonioli, D., Nicolli, F., Ramaciotti, L., & Rizzo, U. (2013). The effect of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations on academics’ entrepreneurial intention. Administrative Science, 6(4), 15

Autio, E. (2005). Report on high-expectation entrepreneurship. London, UK: London Business School-Babson College.

Badzińska, E., & Brzozowska-Woś, M. (2017). Entrepreneurship in Virtual Economy: the Case of Currency One SA. Journal of Management and Business Administration, 25(3), 2-19.

Balta, M.E., Darlington, C., Smith S.L., & Cornelius, N. (2012). Entrepreneurial orientation and social innovation practices in social enterprises: The rhetoric and reality. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(17), 24-32.

Barba-Sanchez, V., & Atienza-Sahuquillo, C. (2017). Entrepreneurial intention among engineering students: The role of entrepreneurship education. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 24(1), 53-61.

Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2003). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Review of Economic Studies, 70(3), 489-520.

Bilan, Y., Mishchuk, H., & Pylypchuk, R. (2017). Towards Sustainable Economic Development via Social Entrepreneurship. Journal of Security & Sustainability Issues, 6(4), 691-702

Bird, B. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intention. The Academy of Man-agement Review 13(3), 442-453.

Carsrud, A., Brannback, M., Elfving, J., & Brandt, K. (2017). Motivations: The entrepreneurial mind and behavior. Revisiting the Entrepreneurial Mind, International Studies in Entrepreneurship 185-209.

Çera, G., Cepel, M., Zakutna, S., & Rozsa, Z. (2018). Gender differences in perception of the univer-sity education quality as applied to entrepreneurial intention. Journal of International Studies, 11(3), 147-160. doi:10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-3/13

Chmielecki, M., & Sułkowski, Ł. (2016). Metaphors of entrepreneurship among polish students: Preliminary research findings. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(4), 141-151.

Covin, J.G., & Slevin, D.P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign envi-ronments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75-87.

Deci, E.L. (1975). Inequity and intrinsic motivation. In L. Deci (Ed.), Intrinsic motivation (pp. 187-206). Boston, MA: Springer.

Douglas, E.J. (2013). Reconstructing entrepreneurial intentions to identify predisposition for growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(5), 633-651.

Dvorský, J., Petráková, Z., Zapletalíková, E., & Rozsa, Z.(2019). Entrepreneurial propensity index of university students. The case study from the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland. Oeconomia Copernicana, 10(1).

European Commission. (2003). Green paper, entrepreneurship in Europe. Retrieved on August 17, 2018 from

European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020 - a European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Retrieved on August 17, 2018 from

European Commission, Bureau of European Policy Advisors. (2011). Empowering people, driving change: Social innovation in the European Union. Retrieved on August 17, 2018 from

European Commission. (2013). Guide to social innovation. Retrieved on August 17, 2018 from

Elfving, J., Brännback, M., & Carsrud, A. (2009). Toward a contextual model of entrepreneurial intentions. In A. Carsrud & M. Brännback (Eds.), Understanding the entrepreneurial mind: In-ternational studies in entrepreneurship (pp. 23-33). New York, NY: Springer.

European Parliament, EMPL. (2010). The Lisbon strategy 2000 – 2010: An analysis and evaluation of the methods used and results achieved. Retrieved on August, 17, 2018 from

Fici, A. (2015). Recognition and legal forms of social enterprise in Europe: A critical analysis from a comparative law perspective (Euricse Working Papers, 82/15). Retrieved on August 17, 2018 from EURICSE website

G. Fekete, É., Bereczk, Á., Kádárné, H.Á., Kiss, J., Péter, Zs., Siposné, N.E., & Szegedi, K. (Eds.). (2017). Alapkutatás a társadalmi vállalkozások működéséről. Miskolc, Hungary: University of Miskolc.

Gundolf, K., Gast, J., & Geraudel, M. (2017). Startups’ innovation behaviour: An investigation into the role of entrepreneurial motivations. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(7).

Haltiwanger, J.C., Jarmin, R.S., & Miranda, J. (2010). Who creates jobs? Small vs. large vs. young. (NBER Working Paper 16300). Retrieved on August 17, 2018 from

House, R.J., Hanges, P.J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P.W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations. The GLOBE study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Hurst, E., & Pugsley, B.W. (2011). What do small businesses do?. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 43(2), 73-118.

Kane, T. (2010). The importance of startups in job creation and job destruction. Retrieved on Au-gust 17, 2018 from

Kerlin, J.A. (2006). Social enterprise in the United States and Europe: Understanding and learning from the differences. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 17(246).

Ketskeméty, L., & Izsó, L. (2005). Bevezetés az SPSS programrendszerbe. Módszertani útmutató és feladatgyűjtemény statisztikai elemzésekhez. Budapest, Hungary: ELTE Eötvös Kiadó.

Kozubikova, L., Sopkova, G., Krajcik, V., & Tyll, L. (2017). Entrepreneurial motives as a differentiat-ing factor in innovativeness (Institute of Economic Research Working Papers No. 156/2017). Retrieved on August 17, 2018 from IDEAS website:

Kozubíková, L., Dvorský, J., Cepel, M. & Balcerzak, A. P. (2017). Important characteristics of an entrepreneur in relation to risk taking: Czech Republic case study. Journal of International Studies, 10(3), 220-233. doi:10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-3/16Krpálková – Krelová, K., & Krpálek, P. (2016). Possibilities for developing business potential in economic education: Ex-amples of implementation in Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Economics & Sociology, 9(4), 119-133.

Krueger, N.F., Reilly, M.D., & Carsrud, A.L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5-6), 411-432.

Kusa, R. (2016). Measuring Entrepreneurial Orientation in the Social Context. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(3), 117-129.

Lönnström, A. (2015). The motivational values of social entrepreneurs (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved on August 17, 2018 from University of Jyväskylä, School of Business and Economics:

Lüthje, Ch., & Franke, N. (2003). The ‘making’ of an entrepreneur: Testing a model of entrepre-neurial intent among engineering students at MIT. R&D Management, 33(2), 135-147.

Maslow, A.H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.

Mugler, J. (1993). Betriebswirtschaftslehre der klein- und mittelbetriebe. Wien, Austria: Springer Verlag.

Nuttin, J. (1984). Motivation, planning, and action. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press and Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

O'leary, S. (2015). The role of enterprise and entrepreneurship within higher education and effec-tive economic governance across central and eastern Europe. Economics & Sociology, 8(2), 143-152.

Radulescu, M., Fedajev, A., Sinisi, C.I., Popescu, C., & Iacob, S.E. (2018). Europe 2020 implementa-tion as driver of economic performance and competitiveness. Panel analysis of CEE countries. Sustainability, 10(2)

Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motiva-tion, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.

Schrör, H. (2006). The profile of the successful entrepreneur - Results of the survey ‘Factors of Business Success’ (Statistics in focus 29/2006). Retrieved on August 17, 2018 from Eurostat website:

Shapero, A. (1982). Social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In C. Kent, D. Sexton & K. Vesper (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship (pp. 72-90). Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall.

Sieger, P., Gruber, M., Fauchart, E., & Zellweger, T. (2016). Measuring the social identity of entre-preneurs: Scale development and international validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(5), 542-572.

Soviana, S. (2015). Cooperative, social enterprise, and community-based enterprise: Competing, substituting, or complementing?. Management and Organizational Studies, 2(2), 1-14.

Stanickova, M. (2017). Can the implementation of the Europe 2020 Strategy goals be efficient? The challenge for achieving social equality in the European Union. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 12(3), 383-398.

Turker, D., & Vural, C.A. (2017). Embedding social innovation process into the institutional context: Voids or supports. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 98-113.

UnLtd. (2014). Pushing boundaries: Why some social entrepreneurs are using a for-profit legal form for their ventures, and how they are embedding their social mission. Retrieved on Au-gust 17, 2018 from

Wach, K., & Wojciechowski, L. (2016). Entrepreneurial Intentions of Students in Poland in the View of Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behaviour. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(1), 83-94.

World Economic Forum. (2013). Breaking the binary: Policy guide to scaling social innovation. Retrieved on August 17, 2018 from Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship:

Zygmunt, J. (2018). Entrepreneurial activity drivers in the transition economies. Evidence from the Visegrad countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(1), 89-103.


Published : 2018-10-11

Bartha, Z., S. Gubik, A., & Bereczk, A. (2018). The Social Dimension of the Entrepreneurial Motivation in the Central and Eastern European Countries. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(1), 9-27.

Zoltán Bartha
University of Miskolc  Hungary

Institute of Economic Theory and Methodology

Andrea S. Gubik 
University of Miskolc  Hungary

Institute of Economic Theory and Methodology

Adam Bereczk 
University of Miskolc  Hungary

Institute of Business Sciences

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are asked to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) only the final version of the article, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). We advise using any of the following research society portals:

Most read articles by the same author(s)