Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020)
June 2020

Articles

Does Entrepreneurship Affect Income Inequality within Countries? Direct and Indirect Effects in European Countries

https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080205

Published 2020-06-30

Aleksandra Gaweł
Poznan University of Economics and Business

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the article is to verify the direct and indirect impact of entrepreneurship on income inequality within countries. Inequality has long been a problem for people, which appears as a consequence of unequal access to and distribution of wealth. The article implements the perspective of entrepreneurship into the discussion on inequality.

Research Design & Methods: The research method is quantitative. Based on panel data of 26 European countries in years 2008-2018, regression functions are estimated to verify research hypotheses.

Findings: The direct influence of entrepreneurship measured by birth rate, death rate, and survival rate on inequality seems to be quite limited. However, the most important relationship is indirect impact through employment creation, which seems to reduce income inequality, especially regarding the employment of surviving companies.

Implications & Recommendations: The employment share of surviving companies is an important variable that reduces income inequality; the entrepreneurship policy should concentrate on supporting the survival of newly created companies, not just on the start-up process.

Contribution & Value Added: The novelty of the article is to implement the distinction between direct and indirect impact of entrepreneurship. The process of new company creation affects not only incomes of entrepreneurs but most importantly the indirect reduction of income inequality through employment. Moreover, the article sheds new light on the matter of inequality by the incorporation of time lag into analyses.

       

Keywords

entrepreneurship, start-up rate, survival rate, employment share, income inequality, within inequality

(PDF) Save

References

  1. Bennett, J., & Rablen, M.D. (2015). Self-employment, wage employment, and informality in a de-veloping economy. Oxford Economic Papers, 67(2), 227-244. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpu047
  2. Bilan, Y., Mishchuk, H., Samoliuk, N., & Yurchyk, H. (2020). Impact of Income Distribution on Social and Economic Well-Being of the State. Sustainability, 12(1), 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010429
  3. Bradley, J. (2016). Self-employment in an equilibrium model of the labor market. IZA Journal of Labor Economics, 5(6), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40172-016-0046-8
  4. Broll, U., Kemnitz, A., & Mukherjee, V. (2019). Globalization, inequality and economic policy. Eco-nomics and Business Review, 19(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2019.1.1
  5. Brown, S., Farrell, L., & Harris, M.N. (2011). Modelling The Incidence of Self-Employment: Individual and Employment Type Heterogeneity. Contemporary Economic Policy, 29(4), 605-619. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1465-7287.2010.00232.X
  6. Coppola, A., Ianuario, S., Chinnici, G., Di Vita, G., Pappalardo, G., & D‘Amico, D. (2018). Endogenous and Exogenous Determinants of Agricultural Productivity: What Is the Most Relevant for the Competitiveness of the Italian Agricultural Systems?. AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 10(2), 33-47. https://doi.org/10.7160/aol.2018.100204.
  7. Crum, M., & Chen, Y. (2015). Self-Employment and Subjective Well-Being: A Multi-Country Analysis. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 19, 15-28.
  8. Dinopoulos, E., & Unel, B. (2017). Managerial capital, occupational choice and inequality in a global economy. Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue canadienne d'économique, 50(2), 365-397.
  9. Dumont, M., Stojanovska, N., & Cuyvers, L. (2011). World inequality, globalisation, technology and labour market institutions. International Journal of Manpower, 32(3), 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437721111136750
  10. Dvorský, J., Petráková, Z., Zapletalíková, E., & Rózsa, Z. (2019). Entrepreneurial propensity index of university students. The case study from the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland. Oeconomia Copernicana, 10(1), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2019.009.
  11. Fan, Z., Zhang, R., & Liu, X. (2016). Income inequality, entrepreneur formation, and the economic development: evidence from China. Journal of The Asia Pacific Economy, 21(3), 444-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2016.1176646
  12. Fritsch, M., Kritikos, A.S., & Sorgner, A. (2015). Why did self-employment increase so strongly in Germany?. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 27(5-6), 307-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1048310
  13. Grilo, I., & Thurik, R.( 2008). Determinants of entrepreneurial engagement levels in Europe and the US. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(6), 1113-1145.
  14. Halvarsson, D., Korpi, M., & Wennberg, K. (2018). Entrepreneurship and income inequality. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 145, 275-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.11.003
  15. Hormiga, E., Batista-Canino, R.M., & Sanchez-Medina, A. (2011). The Impact of Relational Capital on the Success of New Business Start-ups. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(4), 617-638.
  16. Ippolito, M., & Cicatiello, L. (2019). Political Instability, Economic Inequality and Social Conflict: The Case in Italy. Panoeconomicus, 66(3, Special Issue), 365-383. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN1903365I
  17. Joffe, M. (2017). Evidence and the micro-foundations of economic growth. Economics and Business Review, 17(3), 52-79. https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2017.3.410.18559/ebr.2017.3.4
  18. Jones, Ch.I. (2015). Pareto and Piketty: The Macroeconomics of Top Income and Wealth Inequality. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(1), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.1.29
  19. Jung, H., Seo, I., & Jung, K. (2018). Mediating Role of Entrepreneurship in Explaining the Association Between Income Inequality and Regional Economic Performance. Economic Development Quarterly, 32(2), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242418758438
  20. Kihlstrom, R.E., & Laffont, J.-J. (1979). A General Equilibrium Entrepreneurial Theory of Firm For-mation Based on Risk Aversion. Journal of Political Economy, 87(4), 719-748. https://doi.org/10.1086/260790
  21. Kimhi, A. (2010). Entrepreneurship and income inequality in southern Ethiopia. Small Business Eco-nomics, 34, 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9196-4
  22. Krajčírová, R., Ferenzi Vaňová, A., & Munk, M. (2019). What Is Relationship between Profits and Dividends in Agricultural Legal Entities?. AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 11(1), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.7160/aol.2019.110106
  23. Krstić, M. (2014). Rational Choice Theory and Addiction Behavior. Market-TRŽIŠTE, XXVI(2), 163-177.
  24. Kuehn, D. (2018). Human Capital in the Twenty First Century. The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 15(1), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.25428/1824-2979/201801-3-9
  25. Luk’ianchikova, T., & Iamshchikova, T. (2019). The Theory and Reality of Social Inequality. Russian Social Science Review, 60(5-6), 496-506. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611428.2019.1676079
  26. Madsen, J.B., Minniti, A., & Venturini, F. (2018). Assessing Piketty’s second law of capitalism. Ox-ford Economic Papers, 70(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpx040
  27. Malkina, M. (2019). Spatial wage inequality and its sectoral determinants: the case of modern Russia. Oeconomia Copernicana, 10(1), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2019.004
  28. Mihalyi, P., & Szelenyi, I. (2017). Wealth and capital: a critique of Piketty’s conceptualisation of return on capital. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41, 1237-1247. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bew054
  29. Milovanović, M. (2015). Thomas Piketty’s Capitalism Revisited. Panoeconomicus, 62(5), 663-677. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN1505663M
  30. Mishchuk, H., Samoliuk, N., & Bilan, Y. (2019). Measuring social justice in the light of effectiveness of public distributive policy. Administration & Public Management Review, (32). 63-76. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2019.32-05.
  31. Mishchuk H., Samoliuk N., Bilan Y., Streimikiene D. (2018). Income inequality and its consequences within the framework of social justice. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 13(2), 131-138.
  32. Moroz, P.W., & Hindle, K. (2012). Entrepreneurship as a Process: Towards Harmonizing Multiple Perspectives. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(4), 781-818.
  33. Pardo, C., & Ruiz-Tagle, J. (2017). The dynamic role of specific experience in the selection of self-employment versus wage-employment. Oxford Economic Papers, 69(1), 189-212. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpw047
  34. Piketty, T. (2015). Kapitał w XXI wieku. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
  35. Rogalska, E. (2018). Multiple-criteria analysis of regional entrepreneurship conditions in Po-land. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(4), 707-723. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.034.
  36. Ragoubi, H., & El Harbi, S. (2018). Entrepreneurship and income inequality: a spatial panel data analysis. International Review of Applied Economics, 32(3), 374-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2017.1342776
  37. Rallo, J.R. (2018). Some Fundamental Problems with Thomas Piketty’s.”Capital in the Twenty-First Century”. The Independent Review, 22(4), 599-607.
  38. Reynolds, P.D. (2011). Informal and Early Formal Financial Support in the Business Creation Process: Exploration with PSED II Data Set. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 27-54.
  39. Rovira, J.R. (2015). Piketty on Growth and Distribution. Hacienda Publica Espanola / Review of Public Economics, 214(3), 91-114. https://doi.org/10.7866/HPE-RPE.15.3.4
  40. Rupasingha, A., & Goetz, S.J. (2013), Self-employment and local economic performance: Evidence from US counties. Papers in Regional Science, 92(1), 141-162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00396.x
  41. Sanchez, A., & Perez-Corral, A.L. (2018). Government Social Expenditure and Income Inequalities in the European Union. Hacienda Pública Espańola / Review of Public Economics, 227(4), 133-156. https://doi.org/10.7866/HPE-RPE.18.4.5
  42. Santarelli, E., & Vivarelli, M. (2007). Entrepreneurship and the process of firms’ entry, survival and growth. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(3), 455-488.
  43. Schumpeter, J. (1960). Teoria rozwoju gospodarczego. Warszawa: PWN.
  44. Seghers, A., Manigart, S., & Uanacker, T. (2012). The Impact of Human and Social Capital on Entre-preneurs’ Knowledge of Finance Alternatives. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(1), 63-86.
  45. Sekliuckiene, J., Vaitkiene, R., & Vainauskiene, V. (2018). Organisational Learning in Startup Devel-opment and International Growth. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 6(4), 125-144. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2108.060407
  46. Semieniuk, G. (2017). Piketty’s Elasticity of Substitution: A Critique. Review of Political Economy. 29(1), 64-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2016.1244916
  47. Simoes, N., Crespo, N., & Moreira, S.B. (2016). Individual Determinants of Self-Employment Entry: What Do We Really Know?. Journal of Economic Survey, 30(4), 783-806. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12111
  48. Soldatos, G.T. (2017). Inheritance and inequality, and aggregate demand and policy issues. Interna-tional Journal of Social Economics, 44(12), 1833-1845. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-01-2016-0021
  49. Sunajko, G. (2016). Rawls and Piketty: the philosophical aspects of economic inequality. The Journal of Philosophical Economics: Reflections on Economic and Social Issues, IX(2), 71-84.
  50. Szarucki, M., Brzozowski, J., & Stankevičienė, J. (2016). Determinants of Self-Employment Among Polish and Romanian Immigrants in Germany. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(4), 598-612. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2016.1202313
  51. Wiseman, T., & Young, A. (2014). Religion: productive or unproductive?. Journal of Institutional Economics, 10(1), 21-45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413741300026X
  52. Zygmunt, J. (2018). Entrepreneurial activity drivers in the transition economies. Evidence from the Visegrad countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(1), 89-103. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.005.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.