Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Beyond profit: A phenomenological exploration of Generation Z’s entrepreneurial motivations and the integration of financial and social value

Abstract

Objective: This study examines how Generation Z conceptualises profit and how these perceptions shape their entrepreneurial motivations and strategies. Traditional economic theories define profit as financial gain. However, Generation Z entrepreneurs integrate social impact, innovation, and personal fulfilment into their business models. Existing literature largely focuses on generational comparisons without deeply exploring how this cohort reconciles financial and non-financial objectives.

Research Design & Methods: Using a phenomenological approach, we conducted in-depth interviews to capture their lived experiences. The interpretivist paradigm enables a nuanced understanding of profit as both a motivational driver and a business goal.

Findings: The results revealed that profit for Generation Z is not merely materialistic but is intertwined with meaning, value creation, and social impact. Respondents expressed that profit must align with personal satisfaction, authenticity, and the desire to contribute positively to society. This indicates a shift from traditional economic views to a more holistic and value-driven understanding of entrepreneurial success.

Implications & Recommendations: The results indicate that entrepreneurial education, policy, and support programs must adapt to these changing perceptions by fostering business models that combine economic engines with social value creation. Identity, creativity, and meaning construction are important factors governing the entrepreneurial imagination of younger cohorts, and stakeholders need to appreciate this.

Contribution & Value Added: The present research is novel in its theoretical approach by integrating McClelland’s achievement motivation theory with shared value theory and sustainable innovation theory to expand on entrepreneurial motivation theories by examining how Generation Z constructs profit as a multidimensional concept involving financial, psychological, and social facets. It also attempts to extend the profit function theory by positing profit as a form of purposive identity construction and social capital. As for practical implications, the study makes recommendations for educators, policymakers, and business practitioners who seek to advance entrepreneurial education and business models that resonate with the values of Generation Z, especially in the context of ethics, imagination, the creative economy, and the digital world.

Keywords

Generation Z, entrepreneurship, intangible benefits, profit perception, phenomenology

(PDF) Save

Author Biography

Irwan Adimas Ganda Saputra

Assistant Professor of Accounting Education and Lecturer of the Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia. His research interests include: auditing, financial accounting, financial behaviour, and accounting education.

Siti Sri Wulandari

Doctoral of economic education, Lecturer of the Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia. Her research interests include: development of teaching materials, development of learning models, and office administration science.

Dewie Tri Wijayati Wardoyo

Professor of human resource management, strategic management, and leadership, Lecturer of the Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia. Her research interests include: human resource management, strategic management, and leadership.

Yoyok Soeatyo

Professor of business and economics education, Lecturer of the Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia. His research interests include: business and economics education.

Agung Listiadi

Professor of financial accounting learning media, Lecturer of the Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia. His research interests include: financial accounting learning media.


References

  1. Abdulaziz-Alhumaidan, A., & Khan, M.J. (2024). The Effect of Ethical Strategy and Innovation on Economic Performance: a Study on Tunisian B2B Enterprises. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(1), 2589-2606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01248-2
  2. Abdullah, H., Md Zain, F.A., Tajuddin, S.A.F.S.A., Mohammed Foziah, N.H., & Ishak, M.S.I. (2025). Developing employee motivation index: McClelland and Maqasid Shariah. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 16(1), 218-244. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-07-2023-0235
  3. Abdullah, N.L., Rahid, M.R., Muhamad, N.S., & Ngah, N.S. (2022). The Role of Young Social Entrepreneurs in Identity Development. In D. Crowther & F. Quoquab (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurs (Vol. 18, pp. 189-206): Emerald Publishing Limited.
  4. Al Halbusi, H., Popa, S., Alshibani, S.M., & Soto-Acosta, P. (2024). Greening the future: analyzing green entrepreneurial orientation, green knowledge management and digital transformation for sustainable innovation and circular economy. European Journal of Innovation Management, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2024-0169
  5. Amini Sedeh, A., Caiazza, R., Moayed, N., & Moeini Gharagozloo, M.M. (2023). Enabling social entrepreneurship: examining the impact of state, market and religious factors. Management Decision, 61(6), 1754-1772. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2022-0155
  6. Arkorful, H., Hilton, S.K., & Awaah, F. (2022). Generational cohorts and their predisposition toward entrepreneurship in an emerging economy. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-09-2021-0194
  7. Aryoko, Y.P., Anggara, A.A., & Fauziridwan, M. (2024). Gen-Z Entrepreneurial Intentions: Exploring the Impact of Risk, Achievement Needs, and Social Media Engagement. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 24(11), 307-319. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2024/v24i111559
  8. Becker, A., Waldner, C., Nitsch, L., & Trautwein, S. (2023). Communicating social value: An experimental study on credible communication and social enterprises. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 33(3), 511-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21529
  9. Bui, D.T., Nghia Vu, T., Tran, T.V.H., Duong, C.D., & Loan Le, T. (2023). Impact of institutional environment on social entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(3), 100120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100120
  10. Chatterjee, I., Cornelissen, J., & Wincent, J. (2021). Social entrepreneurship and values work: The role of practices in shaping values and negotiating change. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(1), 106064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106064
  11. Creswell, J.W. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5rd ed.): SAGE Publications.
  12. De Tommaso, S.F.N., & Rodrigues, I. (2023). Understanding how firms implemented shared value strategy: a Brazilian business context. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 34(3), 721-740. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-05-2022-0140
  13. Deloitte. (2023). Deloitte Global 2023 Gen Z and Millennial Survey. Retrieved from https://www.deloitte.com/global/en/about/press-room/2023-gen-z-and-millenial-survey.html on April 7, 2025.
  14. Dey, C., & Fasbender, U. (2025). Exploring the role of psychological ownership toward organizational innovation in family businesses. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 17(3), 725-743. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-02-2024-0057
  15. Dimock, M. (2019). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/ on April 7, 2025.
  16. Duncan-Horner, E.M., Farrelly, M.A., & Rogers, B.C. (2022). Understanding the social entrepreneur: a new intentions model for advancing equity, social justice and sustainability. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 14(3), 361-391. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-10-2020-0359
  17. Ewe, S.Y., & Tjiptono, F. (2023). Green behavior among Gen Z consumers in an emerging market: eco-friendly versus non-eco-friendly products. Young Consumers, 24(2), 234-252. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-06-2022-1533
  18. Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Grybauskas, A., Vilkas, M., & Petraitė, M. (2021). Industry 4.0, innovation, and sustainable development: A systematic review and a roadmap to sustainable innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 4237-4257. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2867
  19. Gregori, P., & Holzmann, P. (2020). Digital sustainable entrepreneurship: A business model perspective on embedding digital technologies for social and environmental value creation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122817
  20. Gregori, P., Holzmann, P., & Schwarz, E.J. (2021). My future entrepreneurial self: antecedents of entrepreneurial identity aspiration. Education + Training, 63(7/8), 1175-1194. https://doi.org 10.1108/ET-02-2021-0059
  21. Grilo, R., & Moreira, A.C. (2022). The social as the heart of social innovation and social entrepreneurship: An emerging area or an old crossroads?. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 6(2), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2022.03.001
  22. Guandalini, I. (2022). Sustainability through digital transformation: A systematic literature review for research guidance. Journal of Business Research, 148, 456-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.003
  23. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough?:An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x05279903
  24. Hall, D. (2022). The Future of Entrepreneurship: How Gen Z is Changing Business. Journal of Business and Innovation, 35(2), 112-130.
  25. Lattacher, W., Wdowiak, M.A., Schwarz, E.J., & Audretsch, D.B. (2024). A holistic lens on entrepreneurial learning from failure: continuing the legacy of Jason Cope. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 30(11), 205-235. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-06-2023-0635
  26. Lazarte-Aguirre, A. (2024). Pathways to sustainable entrepreneurship: Analysing drivers of sustainable entrepreneurial orientation. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 3(3), 100081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2024.100081
  27. Lopes, J.M., Gomes, S., & Trancoso, T. (2024). From Risk to Reward: Understanding the Influence of Generation Z and Personality Factors on Sustainable Entrepreneurial Behaviour. FIIB Business Review, 23197145241271467. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145241271467
  28. Mendoza, F., Coule, T.M., & Johnston, A. (2021). Entrepreneurship Education and Entrepreneurial Identity: Beyond Stereotypes. In P. Jones, N. Apostolopoulos, A. Kakouris, C. Moon, V. Ratten & A. Walmsley (Eds.), Universities and Entrepreneurship: Meeting the Educational and Social Challenges (Vol. 11, pp. 237-252), Emerald Publishing Limited.
  29. Morrar, R., Amara, M., & Syed Zwick, H. (2022). The determinants of self-employment entry of Palestinian youth. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 14(1), 23-44. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-06-2020-0184
  30. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. Retrieved from https://methods.sagepub.com/book/mono/phenomenological-research-methods/toc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658
  31. Nandi, S., Nandi, M.L., & Sindhi, S. (2022). Does the concept of “creating shared value” make sense for multinational firms?. Society and Business Review, 17(4), 664-690. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-02-2022-0049
  32. Narayanan, S. (2022). Does Generation Z value and reward corporate social responsibility practices?. Journal of Marketing Management, 38(9-10), 903-937. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2022.2070654
  33. Prakash, D., & Arora, T. (2024). Exploring the influence of contextual factors on social entrepreneurial intentions: A study of generation Z. Industry and Higher Education, 09504222241289799. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222241289799
  34. Sadiq, T., Maas, K., & van Tulder, R. (2021). The Impact of the Hybridization Movement on Organizations and Society. In D.M. Wasieleski & J. Weber (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship (Vol. 5, pp. 119-143): Emerald Publishing Limited.
  35. Saeedikiya, M., Salamzadeh, A., Salamzadeh, Y., & Aeeni, Z. (2024). Cognitions affecting innovation among generation Z entrepreneurs: the external enablement of digital infrastructure. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 30(2/3), 572-608. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-02-2023-0188
  36. Shahzad, F., Akhlaq, A., & Ghaffar, C. (2024). Exploring business succession dynamics in family-owned businesses: lessons from Pakistani case studies. Journal of Family Business Management, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-09-2024-0214
  37. Sharma, L., Bagdi, H., Bulsara, H.P., & Lodaliya, R. (2025). The stimulus of personality traits among Generation Z’s social entrepreneurial intentions: the role of gender. Society and Business Review, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-04-2024-0116
  38. Smith, J.A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2021). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research: SAGE Publications.
  39. Twenge, J. (2023). Generations: The Real Differences between Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, Boomers, and Silents—and What They Mean for America’s Future. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, 75, 212-214. https://doi.org/10.56315/PSCF12-23Twenge
  40. Ucuzoglu, J.B. (2020). Deloitte Global Millennial Survey 2020. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/gr/en/pages/about-deloitte/articles/MillennialSurvey2020.html on October 16, 2024.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.