Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026)
March 2026

Articles

Trade openness, regional economic growth, and crisesin transition countries: The case of Ukraine

Published 2026-03-23

  • Elena Horská
    • ,
  • Serhiy Moroz
    • ,
  • Jozef Palkovič

Elena Horská
Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra

Serhiy Moroz
Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra

Jozef Palkovič
Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra

Abstract

Objective: The article aims to explore the impact of trade openness on the economic development of Ukrainian regions in different conditions, with a particular focus on the global financial crisis (2007-2009) and the ‘hybrid’ stage of the war (2014-2021).

Research Design & Methods: We analysed the influence of trade openness on economic development, considering exchange rate fluctuation and foreign direct investment (FDI). Based on 21 input variables, we created the composite index of economic development using principal component analysis. To verify the hypothesis about the impact of determinants on economic development, we employed this index as a dependent variable in autoregressive dynamic panel models with error correction terms. We used trade openness, exchange rate, and foreign investment as explanatory factors. The article presents the examination of the effects of the mentioned variables across several regional categories, including coastal vs. non-coastal regions, regions with different levels of urbanisation and trade openness, and regions affected by military occupation.

Findings: The findings reveal that trade openness has a significant positive impact on regional development, with its highest influence in the pre-war period. Economic growth of coastal regions is more sensitive to trade openness and FDI, compared to non-coastal regions. Moreover, regions with a higher level of trade openness experience stronger positive effects of FDI. We identified the increased impact of trade openness and FDI on the economic development of coastal regions during the 2007-2009 crisis. On the other hand, their influence decreases in non-coastal regions, compared to pre-crisis years. Furthermore, FDI has a positive effect on economic performance, particularly in non-occupied regions.

Implications & Recommendations: The article’s results are important to better understand the interaction between trade openness and the economic development of Ukrainian regions, especially during the crisis and war periods. The findings indicate that higher trade openness should be achieved to ensure the economic stability of the country’s regions. That is why it is necessary to develop a strategy for the expansion and diversification of Ukrainian exports. The received results could help improve target programs that aim to promote the economic development of the country’s regions. The findings could also serve trade-oriented businesses to understand regional processes in more detail and to enhance decision-making under war conditions.

Contribution & Value Added: The novelty of the article is threefold: (i) practical analysis of Ukraine that can serve as a benchmark in future research for comparative analysis between this country and other economies; (ii) comparison of the impact of trade openness on economic development of regions under crisis and non-crisis conditions; and (iii) the use of several classifications of the country’s regions (i.e., the proximity to the war zone, the sea access, and the urbanisation level) to identify peculiarities of the above-mentioned impact during the ‘hybrid’ stage of the war.

Keywords

trade openness, regional development, crisis, war, Ukraine

(PDF) Save

Author Biography

Elena Horská

Dr.h.c. Prof. Dr. Ing., Institute of Marketing, Trade and Social Studies, Faculty of Economics and Management, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra. Dean of the Faculty of Economics and Management, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra. Her research interests include consumer studies, food marketing and internationalisation.

Serhiy Moroz

Assoc. prof., CSc., Institute of Marketing, Trade and Social Studies, Faculty of Economics and Management, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra. His research interests include economic development, q

Jozef Palkovič

Ing., PhD, Institute of Statistics, Operation Research and Mathematics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra. His research interests include food security, sustainable development and risk evaluation.

References

  1. Ali, A., & Imai, K.S. (2015). Crises, economic integration and growth collapses in African countries. Journal of African Economies, 24(4), 471-501. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejv010
  2. Benarroch, M., & Pandey, M. (2012). The relationship between trade openness and government size: Does disaggregating government expenditure matter?”. Journal of Macroeconomics, 34(1), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2011.11.002
  3. Benita, F. (2019). Trade openness, economic growth and the global financial crisis of 2007-2009 in Latin America. Journal of International Development, 31(5), 411-431. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3411
  4. Camarero, M., Martínez-Zarzoso, I., Nowak-Lehmann, F., & Tamarit, C. (2016). Trade openness and income: A tale of two regions. World Economy, 39(3), 386-408. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12306
  5. Caporale, G.M., Sova, A.D., & Sova, R. (2023). The short-run and long-run effects of trade openness on financial development: Some panel evidence for Europe. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 28(4), 3891-3901. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2626
  6. Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2), 249-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5606(00)00048-6
  7. Dorn, F., Fuest, C., & Potrafke, N. (2022). Trade openness and income inequality: New empirical evidence. Economic Inquiry, 60(1), 202-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.13018
  8. Duernecker, G., Meyer, M., & Vega-Redondo, F. (2022). Trade openness and growth: A network-based approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 37(6), 1182-1203. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2920
  9. Eris, M.N., & Ulasan, B. (2013). Trade openness and economic growth: Bayesian model averaging estimate of cross-country growth regressions. Economic Modelling, 33, 867-883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.05.014
  10. Fujii, E. (2017). Government size, trade openness, and output volatility: A case of fully integrated economies. Open Economies Review, 28(4), 661-684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-017-9433-4
  11. Garncarz, J. (2024). The impact of economic openness on the economic growth of Central and Eastern European countries after the systemic transformation. International Entrepreneurship Review, 10(4), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2024.1004.06
  12. Gnangnon, S. K., & Brun, J.-F. (2019). Trade openness, tax reform and tax revenue in developing countries. World Economy, 42(12), 3515-3536. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12858
  13. Gonçalves, E., Gonçalves Taveira, J., Labrador, A., & Pio, J.G. (2021). Is trade openness a carrier of knowledge spillovers for developed and developing countries?. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 58, 66-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2021.03.006
  14. Haddad, M., Lim, J.J., Pancaro, C., & Saborowski, C. (2013). Trade openness reduces growth volatility when countries are well diversified. Canadian Journal of Economics, 46(2), 765-790. https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.12031
  15. Hansen, B.E. (1999). Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of Econometrics, 93(2), 345-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00025-1
  16. Horská, E., Moroz, S., Poláková, Z., Nagyová, L., & Paska, I. (2019). Evaluation of interaction between chosen indicators of development of regions in Ukraine. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 14(2), 341-357. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2019.016
  17. Horská, E., Moroz, S., & Palkovič, J. (2023). Determinants of export activities in Ukrainian regions in the pre-conflict and the first-stage conflict periods. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(1), 181-198. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2023.110110
  18. Hossain, R., Roy, C.K., & Akter, R. (2022). The effects of foreign direct investment and trade openness on economic growth amid crises in Asian economies. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 14(2), 231-243. https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol14.iss2.art7
  19. Huchet-Bourdon, M., Le Mouël, C., & Vijil, M. (2018). The relationship between trade openness and economic growth: Some new insights on the openness measurement issue. World Economy, 41(1), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12586
  20. Kacou, K.Y.T., Kassouri, Y., Evrard, T.H., & Altuntaş, M. (2022). Trade openness, export structure, and labor productivity in developing countries: Evidence from panel VAR approach. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 60, 194-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2021.11.015
  21. Khan, I., Nawaz, Z., & Saeed, B.B. (2021). Does trade openness and FDI reduce inequality? Evidence from South Asia. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 26(4), 6459-6470. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2131
  22. Kim, D.-H., Lin, S.-C., & Suen, Y.-B. (2010). Dynamic effects of trade openness on financial development. Economic Modelling, 27(1), 254-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2009.09.005
  23. Kim, D.-H., Lin, S.-C., & Suen, Y.-B. (2011). Nonlinearity between trade openness and economic development. Review of Development Economics, 15(2), 279-292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2011.00608.x
  24. Kong, Q., Peng, D., Ni, Y., Jiang, X., & Wang, Z. (2021). Trade openness and economic growth quality of China: Empirical analysis using ARDL model. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101488
  25. Kulińska, K. (2024). Systematic literature review on the relation between export and economic growth. International Entrepreneurship Review, 10(3), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2024.1003.05
  26. Li, L., Jiang, H., Liu, M., & Wu, Q. (2023). Developing a model between trade openness and economic recovery: Panel data analysis for Chinese pilot-regions. Renewable Energy, 217, 119132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119132
  27. Lin, F., Li, B., & Sim, N.C.S. (2014). Trade openness and government size of small developing countries. Economics of Transition, 22(4), 783-808. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12053
  28. Luangaram, P., & Wongpunya, N. (2024). The effect of trade openness and exchange rate on inflation targeting in Thailand. Journal of Asian Economics, 92, 101733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2024.101733
  29. Mao Takongmo, C.-O., & Touré, A. (2023). Trade openness and connectedness of national productions: Do financial openness, economic specialization, and the size of the country matter?. Economic Modelling, 125, 106340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106340
  30. Mtar, K., & Belazreg, W. (2023). On the nexus of innovation, trade openness, financial development and economic growth in European countries: New perspective from a GMM panel VAR approach. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 28(1), 766-791. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2449
  31. Musila, J.W., & Yiheyis, Z. (2015). The impact of trade openness on growth: The case of Kenya. Journal of Policy Modeling, 37(2), 342-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2014.12.001
  32. Nam, H.-J., Bang, J., & Ryu, D. (2023). Paradox of trade openness: The moderated mediating role of governance. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 89, 101887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2023.101887
  33. Nam, H.-J., Frijns, B., & Ryu, D. (2024). Trade openness and income inequality: The moderating role of institutional quality. Global Finance Journal, 60, 100959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2024.100959
  34. Nam, H.-J., & Ryu, D. (2024). Does trade openness promote economic growth in developing countries?. Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money, 93, 101985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2024.101985
  35. Nannicini, T., & Billmeier, A. (2011). Economies in transition: How important is trade openness for growth?. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 73(3), 287-314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2010.00626.x
  36. Olechnicka, A., & Kniazevych, A. (2025). War-induced relocation of high-tech companies: Spatial perspectives from Ukraine and Poland. International Entrepreneurship Review, 11(2), 83-103. https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2025.1102.05
  37. Özyurt, S., & Daumal, M. (2013). Trade openness and regional income spillovers in Brazil: A spatial econometric approach. Papers in Regional Science, 92(1), 197-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00403.x
  38. Rivas, M.G. (2007). The effects of trade openness on regional inequality in Mexico. Annals of Regional Science, 41(3), 545-561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-006-0099-x
  39. Roquez-Diaz, A., & Escot, L. (2018). Relationship between trade openness and economic growth in Latin America: A causality analysis with heterogeneous panel data. Review of Development Economics, 22(2), 658-684. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12358
  40. Sakyi, D., Villaverde, J., & Maza, A. (2015). Trade openness, income levels, and economic growth: The case of developing countries, 1970-2009. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 24(6), 860-882. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2014.971422
  41. Zhao, H., Li, Y., Wang, Z., & Zhao, R. (2024). Trade liberalization, regional trade openness degree, and foreign direct investment: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Review, 59, 101103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2023.101103

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.