Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025)
June 2025

Articles

Development and validation of digital leadership skills scale

Published 2025-06-30

  • Nadire Cavus
    • ,
  • Seyedali Aghamiri
    • ,
  • Nuriye Sancar

Nadire Cavus
Near East University

Seyedali Aghamiri
Near East University

Nuriye Sancar
Near East University

Abstract

Objective: The main aim of this study is to construct a digital leadership skills scale (DLS scale) to measure digital leadership skills. Moreover, by integrating the constructed scale into the existing model in the literature, we aimed to investigate the influence of the DLS scale on organisational factors, digital transformation, and enterprises’ financial performance.

Research Design & Methods: We used the quantitative research method to construct the DLS scale and to test the proposed model based on a sample of 701 active employees in enterprises. In the first stage of the study, we conducted the comprehensive validity and reliability analysis including content validity, construct validity based on explanatory factor analysis, reliability analysis via Cronbach’s alpha, Spearman-Brown coefficient, and retest reliability with Intraclass correlation and Pearson correlation coefficients, confirmatory factor analysis, and item analysis during the development process of the DLS scale. In the second stage, we integrated the digital leadership skills scale into the existing model as a factor and examined the overall compatibility and harmony of the integrated DLS scale items with the existing model. In the third stage of the study, we tested the proposed model with a linear regression analysis model.

Findings: The comprehensive validity and reliability analysis results showed that the constructed DLS scale is valid and reliable. Moreover, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), reliability, item analysis, convergent, and discriminant validity analysis results indicated that the constructed DLS scale was harmoniously integrated with the existing model in the literature. Moreover, simple linear regression analysis results indicated that the constructed digital leadership skills scale influences organisational factors, digital transformation (DT), and enterprises’ financial performance.

Implications & Recommendations: With the constructed scale, it will be possible for enterprises undergoing digital transformation to measure their digital leadership skills. Moreover, by integrating this constructed DLS scale into the model that enterprises will use during their digital transformation process, they can enhance the effect of digital transformation on financial performance as well. In other words, using this proposed model, enterprises can gain useful insights into the process of digital transformation and make well-informed choices about the integration of DLS into their digital transformation plans.

Contribution & Value Added: In this study, we constructed a novel scale to determine the digital leadership skills of the leaders who will lead the digital transformation process in enterprises. Moreover, we introduced to the literature a different model that can evaluate the effects of digital leadership skills on organisational factors, DT, and financial performance of enterprises in the digitalization process in enterprises by proposing a model that includes the constructed scale.

Keywords

digital leadership skills, digital transformation, enterprises, financial performance, organisational factors

(PDF) Save

Author Biography

Nadire Cavus

Professor of the Department of Computer Information Systems. Her research interests include information systems, digital transformation, technology, and e-business.

Seyedali Aghamiri

Master’s degree in Computer Information Systems. His research interests include SMEs and digital transformation.

Nuriye Sancar

Associate Professor of the Department of Mathematics. Her research interests include data analysis, machine learning models, and scale development.

References

  1. Alsalminy, B.M.K., & Omrane, A. (2023). The effects of emotional intelligence on leadership effectiveness (A prospective case study of three industrial companies in Iraq). Journal of Positive Psychology & Wellbeing, 7(2), 98-1006. Retrieved from https://journalppw.com/index.php/jppw/article/view/16496 November 10, 2024.
  2. Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  3. Appio, F.P., Frattini, F., Petruzzelli, A.M., & Neirotti, P. (2021). Digital transformation and innovation management: A synthesis of existing research and an agenda for future studies. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(1), 4-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12562
  4. Araujo, L.M. de, Priadana, S., Paramarta, V., & Sunarsi, D. (2021). Digital leadership in business organizations: An overview. International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership, 2(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.51629/ijeamal.v2i1.18
  5. Bollen, K.A. (1986). Sample size and Bentler and Bonett’s nonnormed fit index. Psychometrika, 51, 375-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294061
  6. Bollen, K.A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general Structural Equation Models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124189017003004
  7. Caputo, A., Pizzi, S., Pellegrini, M.M., & Dabić, M. (2021). Digitalization and business models: Where are we going? A science map of the field. Journal of Business Research, 123, 489-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.053
  8. Cavus, N., & Sancar, N. (2023). The importance of digital signature in sustainable businesses: A scale development study. Sustainability, 15(6), 5008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065008
  9. Chonsawat, N., & Sopadang, A. (2020). Defining SMEs’ 4.0 Readiness Indicators. Applied Sciences, 10(24), 8998. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10248998
  10. Dalvi, M.R., Shekarchizadeh, A.R., & Baghsorkhi, G.R. (2013). Investigating of organizational agility components (culture, leadership, organizational change and customer services) on the organizational performance based on the satellite model (Snowa Company as a case study). Global Journal of Pure & Applied Science and Technology, 3(4), 15-29. Retrieved from https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:55080604 on April 4, 2024.
  11. El Sawy, O., Amsinck, H.A., Kræmmergaard, P., & Vinther, A.L. (2016). How LEGO built the foundations and enterprise capabilities for digital leadership. MIS Quarterly Executive, 15(2), 141-166. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/misqe/vol15/iss2/5 on March 27, 2024.
  12. Euler, T. (2015). Digital leadership: Leading successfully in the age of digital transformation. Digital Hills. Retrieved from https://medium.com/digital-hills/digital-leadership-leading-successfully-in-the-age-of-digital-transformation-part-1-35190fdbe2a6 on June 12, 2024.
  13. Fabian, N.E., Broekhuizen, T., & Nguyen, D.K. (2021). Digital transformation and financial performance: Do digital specialists unlock the profit potential of new digital business models for SMEs?. In A. Hinterhuber, T., Vescovi, & F. Checchinato (Eds.), Managing Digital Transformation (1 ed., pp. 240-258). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008637-25
  14. Fernández-Rovira, C., Álvarez Valdés, J., Molleví, G., & Nicolas-Sans, R. (2021). The digital transformation of business. Towards the datafication of the relationship with customers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120339
  15. Fokkema, M., & Greiff, S. (2017). How performing PCA and CFA on the same data equals trouble: Overfitting in the assessment of internal structure and some editorial thoughts on It. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33(6), 399-402. Retrieved from https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1027/1015-5759/a000460 on November 10, 2024.
  16. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  17. Gnizy, I. (2019). Big data and its strategic path to value in international firms. International Marketing Review, 36(3), 318-341. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2018-0249
  18. Gruber, H. (2019). Proposals for a digital industrial policy for Europe. Telecommunications Policy, 43(2), 116-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.06.003
  19. Hai, N.T. (2021). Digital transformation barriers for small and medium enterprises in Vietnam today. Laplage em Revista (International), 7(3A), 416-426. https://doi.org/10.24115/S2446-6220202173A1424p.416-426
  20. Hair, J.F., Tatham, R.L., Anderson, R.E., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.
  21. He, Z., Huang, H., Choi, H., & Bilgihan, A. (2023). Building organizational resilience with digital transformation. Journal of Service Management, 34(1), 147-171. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-06-2021-0216
  22. Heinze, A., Griffiths, M., Fenton, A., & Fletcher, G. (2018). Knowledge exchange partnership leads to digital transformation at Hydro-X Water Treatment, Ltd. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 34(3), 28-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.21859
  23. Henfridsson, O., & Bygstad, B. (2013). The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 907-931. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.11
  24. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  25. Holopainen, M., Ukko, J., & Saunila, M. (2022). Managing the strategic readiness of industrial companies for digital operations. Digital Business, 2(2), 100039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2022.100039
  26. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M.R. (2008). Structural Equation Modeling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53-60. https://doi.org/10.21427/D7CF7R
  27. Wang, D., & Xia, X. (2024). The impact of corporate digital transformation on firms’ performance in utilities sector. Heliyon, 10(15), e23362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23362
  28. Jacobs, B.W., Kraude, R., & Narayanan, S. (2016). Operational productivity, corporate social performance, financial performance, and risk in manufacturing firms. Production and Operations Management, 25(12), 2065-2085. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12596
  29. Kääriäinen, J., Pussinen, P., Saari, L., Kuusisto, O., Saarela, M., & Hänninen, K. (2021). Applying the positioning phase of the digital transformation model in practice for SMEs: Toward systematic development of digitalization. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 8(4), 24-43. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm080402
  30. Klein, M. (2020). Leadership characteristics in the era of digital transformation. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(1), 883-902. Retrieved from https://www.bmij.org/index.php/1/article/view/1441/1275 on April 3, 2023.
  31. Ko, A., Fehér, P., Kovacs, T., Mitev, A., & Szabó, Z. (2022). Influencing factors of digital transformation: management or IT is the driving force?. International Journal of Innovation Science, 14(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-01-2021-0007
  32. Ladkin, D., & Patrick, C.B. (2022). Whiteness in leadership theorizing: A critical analysis of race in Bass’ transformational leadership theory. Leadership, 18(2), 205-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/17427150211066442
  33. Lawshe, C.H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  34. Lipsmeier, A., Kühn, A., Joppen, R., & Dumitrescu, R. (2020). Process for the development of a digital strategy. Procedia CIRP, 88, 173-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.05.031
  35. Malik, M., Raziq, M.M., Sarwar, N., & Tariq, A. (2024). Digital leadership, business model innovation and organizational change: Role of leader in steering digital transformation. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2023-0283
  36. Matt, C., Hess, T., & Benlian, A. (2015). Digital transformation strategies. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57(5), 339-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0401-5
  37. Mubarak, M.F., Shaikh, F.A., Mubarik, M., Samo, K.A., & Mastoi, S. (2019). The impact of digital transformation on business performance: A study of Pakistani SMEs. Engineering, Technology and Applied Science Research, 9(6), 5056-5061. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.3201
  38. Neuhaus, C., Camathias, C., Mumme, M., & Faude, O. (2023). The German version of the KOOS‐Child questionnaire (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for children) shows a good to excellent internal consistency and a high test–retest reliability in children with knee problems. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 31(4), 1354-1360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07074-4
  39. Peng, Y., & Tao, C. (2022). Can digital transformation promote enterprise performance?—From the perspective of public policy and innovation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(3), 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100198
  40. Persson, J., & Manas, K. (2021). Towards the new normal: Digital transformation through digital leadership and digital transformation strategies. Dissertation. Retrieved from https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-103941 on June 11, 2024.
  41. Polit, D.F., Beck, C.T., & Owen, S.V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459-467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
  42. Porfírio, J.A., Carrilho, T., Felício, J.A., & Jardim, J. (2021). Leadership characteristics and digital transformation. Journal of Business Research, 124, 610-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.058
  43. Promsri, C. (2019). Developing model of digital leadership for a successful digital transformation. GPHInternational Journal of Business Management, 2(8), 1-8. Retrieved from https://gphjournal.org/index.php/bm/article/view/249 on March 25, 2023.
  44. Rafael, L.D., Jaione, G.E., Cristina, L., & Ibon, S.L. (2020). An Industry 4.0 maturity model for machine tool companies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 159, 120203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120203
  45. Ramantoko, G., Fatimah, L., Pratiwi, S., & Kinasih, K. (2018). Measuring digital capability maturity: Case of small-medium Kampong-digital companies in Bandung. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 26(T), 215-230. Retrieved from https://myjurnal.mohe.gov.my/public/article-view.php?id=126451 on May 18, 2024.
  46. Rockstuhl, T., Seiler, S., Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., & Annen, H. (2011). Beyond general intelligence (IQ) and emotional intelligence (EQ): The role of cultural intelligence (CQ) on cross‐border leadership effectiveness in a globalized world. Journal of Social Issues, 67(4), 825-840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01730.x
  47. Salovey, P., & Mayer, J.D. (1990). Emotional Intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185-211. https://doi.org/10.2190/dugg-p24e-52wk-6cdg
  48. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74. Retrieved from https://search.gesis.org/publication/zis-Schermelleh-EngelMoosbrugger2003Evaluating on March 10, 2024.
  49. Scuotto, V., Nicotra, M., Del Giudice, M., Krueger, N., & Gregori, G.L. (2021). A microfoundational perspective on SMEs’ growth in the digital transformation era. Journal of Business Research, 129, 382-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.045
  50. Senadjki, A., Au Yong, H.N., Ganapathy, T., & Ogbeibu, S. (2024). Unlocking the potential: The impact of digital leadership on firms’ performance through digital transformation. Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development, 4(2), 161-177. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBSED-06-2023-0050
  51. Singh, A., Klarner, P., & Hess, T. (2020). How do chief digital officers pursue digital transformation activities? The role of organization design parameters. Long Range Planning, 53(3), 101890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.07.001
  52. Streiner, D.L., Norman, G.R., & Cairney, J. (2014). Health Measurement Scales. A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (4th. Edition). Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA.
  53. Suuronen, S., Ukko, J., Eskola, R., Semken, R.S., & Rantanen, H. (2022). A systematic literature review for digital business ecosystems in the manufacturing industry: Prerequisites, challenges, and benefits. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 37, 414-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.02.016
  54. Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell, L.S., & Ullman, J.B. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (Vol. 6, pp. 497-516). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  55. Tabrizi, B., Lam, E., Girard, K., & Irvin, V. (2019). Digital transformation is not about technology. Harvard Business Review, 13, 1-6. Retrieved from https://www.hbsp.harvard.edu/product/H04TO3-PDF-ENG on May 5, 2024.
  56. Teng, X., Zhong, W., & Feng, Y. (2022). Research on the relationship between digital transformation and performance of SMEs. Sustainability, 14(10), 6012. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106012
  57. Tigre, F.B., Curado, C., & Henriques, P.L. (2023). Digital leadership: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518221123132
  58. Valdez-Juárez, L.E., Ramos-Escobar, E.A., Hernández-Ponce, O.E., & Ruiz-Zamora, J.A. (2024). Digital transformation and innovation, dynamic capabilities to strengthen the financial performance of Mexican SMEs: A sustainable approach. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2318635. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2318635
  59. Vaska, S., Massaro, M., Bagarotto, E.M., & Dal Mas, F. (2020). The digital transformation of business model innovation: A structured literature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 539363. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.539363
  60. Verhoef, P.C., Broekhuizen, T.L., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Qi Dong, J., Fabian, N.E., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122(C), 889-901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
  61. Wang, H., Feng, J., Zhang, H., & Li, X. (2020). The effect of digital transformation strategy on performance: The moderating role of cognitive conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 31(3), 441-462. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-09-2019-0166
  62. Warner, K.S.R., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001
  63. Wessel, L., Baiyere, A., Ologeanu-Taddei, R., Cha, J., & Blegind-Jensen, T. (2021). Unpacking the difference between digital transformation and IT-enabled organizational transformation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22(1), 102-129. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00655
  64. Westerman, G., Tannou, M., Bonnet, D., Ferraris, P., & McAfee, A. (2012). The digital advantage: How digital leaders outperform their peers in every industry. Retrieved from https://ide.mit.edu/sites/default/files/publications/TheDigitalAdvantage.pdf on June 11, 2024.
  65. Winston, B.E., & Patterson, K. (2006). An integrative definition of leadership. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 1(2), 6-66. Retrieved from https://www.regent.edu/journal/international-journal-of-leadership-studies/an-integrative-leadership-definition/ on January 9, 2025.
  66. Yaghmaie, F. (2003). Content validity and its estimation. Journal of Medical Education, 3(1), 25-27.
  67. Zhao, L., He, Q., Guo, L., & Sarpong, D. (2023). Organizational digital literacy and enterprise digital transformation: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3241411

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.