Identifying factors affecting entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intention among Indonesian university students


Objective: The shift from conventional to online learning activities may impact students’ performance and entrepreneurial involvement. This research investigates the role of e-learning in determining entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and students’ intention on entrepreneurship.

Research Design & Methods: A quantitative method with structural equation modelling using the partial least squared was implemented to understand the phenomenon. The study involved students who enrolled in online entrepreneurship education in several universities in Malang of Indonesia.

Findings: The findings indicate that students’ entrepreneurship education and self-efficacy can be performed using e-learning, and it is closely linked with lecturer competence, performance expectancy, and facilitating condition. The results also show a linkage between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intention. This research confirms a crucial role of self-efficacy and entrepreneurship education in mediating teachers’ competence and intention for entrepreneurship. This is the first step for further investigation regarding the effect of online learning on college students’ entrepreneurial intentions.

Implications & Recommendations: This study implies that lecturers need to improve their competency on how to teach entrepreneurship more meaningful and involve all of students’ psychological aspects. Furthermore, in cooperation with the government, the campus can provide adequate facilities and infrastructure to support online learning. Additionally, the government can consider improving the quality of the internet network so that geographical conditions do not constrain it.

Contribution & Value Added: This research provides an appropriate strategy to promote entrepreneurship education with e-learning that can be adopted during the global Covid-19 pandemic. Moreover, in a regular situation, the strategy may still enhance entrepreneurship promotion as it fosters familiarity with the use of educational technology.


e-learning; lecturer competence; self-efficacy; students’ entrepreneurial intention; entrepreneurship education

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.

Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influ-encing the e-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 5261-5280.

Ameen, A., Almari, H., & Isaac, O. (2018, June). Determining underlying factors that influence online social network usage among public sector employees in the UAE. In International Conference of Reliable In-formation and Communication Technology (pp. 945-954). Berlin: Springer, Cham.

Bell, R. (2021). Underpinning the entrepreneurship educator’s toolkit: conceptualising the influence of edu-cational philosophies and theory. Entrepreneurship Education, 4(1), 1-18.

Bervell, B., & Arkorful, V. (2020). LMS-enabled blended learning utilization in distance tertiary education: establishing the relationships among facilitating conditions, voluntariness of use and use behaviour. In-ternational Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-16.

Bhatti, M. A., Al Doghan, M. A., Saat, S. A. M., Juhari, A. S., & Alshagawi, M. (2021). Entrepreneurial inten-tions among women: does entrepreneurial training and education matters? (Pre-and post-evaluation of psychological attributes and its effects on entrepreneurial intention). Journal of Small Business and En-terprise Development, 28(2), 167-184.

Bongaerts, D., Mazzola, F., & Wagner, W. (2021). Closed for business: The mortality impact of business clo-sures during the Covid-19 pandemic. PloS one, 16(5), e0251373.

Cardon, M. S., Wincent, J., Singh, J., & Drnovsek, M. (2009). The nature and experience of entrepreneurial passion. Academy of management Review, 34(3), 511-532.

Chen, J. L. (2011). The effects of education compatibility and technological expectancy on e-learning ac-ceptance. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1501-1511.

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295-336.

Decman, M. (2015). Modeling the acceptance of e-learning in mandatory environments of higher education: The influence of previous education and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 272-281.

Elnadi, M., & Gheith, M. H. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystem, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepre-neurial intention in higher education: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. The International Journal of Manage-ment Education, 19(1), 100458.

Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Decker, A.-T., Büttner, G., Hardy, I., Klieme, E., & Kunter, M. (2019). The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102882.

Fejes, A., Nylund, M., & Wallin, J. (2019). How do teachers interpret and transform entrepreneurship educa-tion?. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(4), 554-566.

Fuller, B., Liu, Y., Bajaba, S., Marler, L. E., & Pratt, J. (2018). Examining how the personality, self-efficacy, and anticipatory cognitions of potential entrepreneurs shape their entrepreneurial intentions. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 120-125.

Gavrila, S. G., & Ancillo, A. D. L. (2021). Entrepreneurship, innovation, digitization and digital transformation toward a sustainable growth within the pandemic environment. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 28(1), 45-66.

Gupta, S. L., & Sharma, A. (2018). Exploring the moderating role of entrepreneurial education and mediating role of entrepreneurial attitude on the relation of entrepreneurial characteristics and entrepreneurial intention. The Business & Management Review, 9(3), 267-267.

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1-2), 1-12.

Hair Jr, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using con-firmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101-110.

Henry, C., & Lewis, K. (2018). A review of entrepreneurship education research. Education+ Training, 60(3), 263-286.

Ibrahim, N. A., & Lucky, E. O. I. (2014). Relationship between entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurial skills, environmental factor and entrepreneurial intention among Nigerian students in UUM. Entrepre-neurship and Innovation Management Journal, 2(4), 203-213.

Kaliisa, R., Palmer, E., & Miller, J. (2019). Mobile learning in higher education: A comparative analysis of developed and developing country contexts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 546-561.

Karyaningsih, R. P. D., Wibowo, A., Saptono, A., & Narmaditya, B. S. (2020). Does entrepreneurial knowledge influence vocational students’ intention? Lessons from Indonesia. Entrepreneurial Business and Econom-ics Review, 8(4), 138-155.

Kock, N., & Gaskins, L. (2014). The mediating role of voice and accountability in the relationship between Internet diffusion and government corruption in Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa. Information Technology for Development, 20(1), 23-43.

Kock, N., & Lynn, G. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for information Systems, 13(7), 1-40.

Kusmintarti, A., Asdani, A., & Riwajanti, N. I. (2017). The relationship between creativity, entrepreneurial attitude and entrepreneurial intention (case study on the students of State Polytechnic Malang). Inter-national Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 10(1), 28-36.

Li, L., & Wu, D. (2019). Entrepreneurial education and students’ entrepreneurial intention: does team coop-eration matter?. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1), 1-13.

Lin, P.-C., Lu, H.-K., & Liu, C. (2013). Towards an education behavioral intention model for e-learning sys-tems: an extension of UTAUT. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 47(3), 1120-1127.

Linan, F. (2004). Intention-based models of entrepreneurship education. Piccolla Impresa/Small Business, 3(1), 11-35.

Looi, K. H., & Maritz, A. (2021). Government institutions, entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurship education programmes in Malaysia. Education+ Training, 63(2), 271-291.

McGill, C. M., Heikkila, M., & Lazarowicz, T. (2020). Professional development, performance expectations and academic advisors’ perceptions of relational skills: a sequential explanatory mixed methods study. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 32(4), 50-69.

Mei, H., Lee, C. H., & Xiang, Y. (2020). Entrepreneurship Education and Students’ Entrepreneurial Intention in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 10(9), 257.

Mukhtar, S., Wardana, L. W., Wibowo, A., & Narmaditya, B. S. (2021). Does entrepreneurship education and culture promote students’ entrepreneurial intention? The mediating role of entrepreneurial mindset. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1918849.

Nakara, W. A., Messeghem, K., & Ramaroson, A. (2021). Innovation and entrepreneurship in a context of poverty: a multilevel approach. Small Business Economics, 56(4), 1601-1617.

Neumann, T. (2021). The impact of entrepreneurship on economic, social and environmental welfare and its determinants: a systematic review. Management Review Quarterly, 71(3), 553-584.

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.

Piperopoulos, P., & Dimov, D. (2015). Burst bubbles or build steam? Entrepreneurship education, entrepre-neurial self‐efficacy, and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 970-985.

Qashou, A. (2021). Influencing factors in M-learning adoption in higher education. Education and information technologies, 26(2), 1755-1785.

Rafique, G. M., Mahmood, K., Warraich, N. F., & Rehman, S. U. (2021). Readiness for Online Learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A survey of Pakistani LIS students. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(3), 102346.

Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Edu-cation, 2(3), 923-945.

Ratten, V., & Jones, P. (2020). Covid-19 and entrepreneurship education: Implications for advancing research and practice. The International Journal of Management Education, 100432.

Ratten, V., & Usmanij, P. (2021). Entrepreneurship education: Time for a change in research direction?. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(1), 100367.

Samat, M. F., Awang, N. A., Hussin, S. N. A., & Nawi, F. A. M. (2020). Online Distance Learning amidst COVID-19 Pandemic among University Students: A Practicality of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(3), 220-233.

Siron, Y., Wibowo, A., & Narmaditya, B. S. (2020). Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning in Indonesia: Lesson from Covid-19. JOTSE: Journal of Technology and Science Education, 10(2), 282-295.

Surachim, A., Hurriyati, R., Lisnawati, L., Sulastri, S., & Mulyadi, H. (2018). Using social media to promote student entrepreneurship. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 26, 73-183.

Sutter, C., Bruton, G. D., & Chen, J. (2019). Entrepreneurship as a solution to extreme poverty: A review and future research directions. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(1), 197-214.

Tarhini, A., Al-Busaidi, K. A., Mohammed, A. B., & Maqableh, M. (2017). Factors influencing students’ adop-tion of e-learning: a structural equation modeling approach. Journal of International Education in Busi-ness, 10(2), 164-182.

Tung, D. T., Hung, N. T., Phuong, N. T. C., Loan, N. T. T., & Chong, S. C. (2020). Enterprise development from students: The case of universities in Vietnam and the Philippines. The International Journal of Manage-ment Education, 18(1), 100333.

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extend-ing the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178.

Wardana, L. W., Narmaditya, B. S., Wibowo, A., Mahendra, A. M., Wibowo, N. A., Harwida, G., & Rohman, A. N. (2020). The impact of entrepreneurship education and students’ entrepreneurial mindset: the medi-ating role of attitude and self-efficacy. Heliyon, 6(9), e04922.

Wardoyo, C., Satrio, Y. D., Narmaditya, B. S., & Wibowo, A. (2021). Do technological knowledge and game-based learning promote students’ achievement: lesson from Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(11), e08467.

Widyanti, R., & Rajiani, I. (2021). Nascent entrepreneurs of millennial generations in the emerging market of Indonesia. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 9(2), 151-165.

Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Hills, G. E. (2005). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entre-preneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265.

Published : 2022-05-21

WidjajaS. U. M., WibowoA., NarmadityaB. S., WardoyoC., & SaptonoA. (2022). Identifying factors affecting entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intention among Indonesian university students. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 10(3), 89-104.

Sri Umi Mintarti Widjaja
Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia  Indonesia
Agus Wibowo 
Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia  Indonesia
Bagus Shandy Narmaditya 
Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia  Indonesia
Cipto Wardoyo 
Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia  Indonesia
Ari Saptono 
Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia  Indonesia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are asked to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) only the final version of the article, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). We advise using any of the following research society portals:

Most read articles by the same author(s)