Metaphors of Entrepreneurship among Polish Students: Preliminary Research Findings

Abstract

Objective: In Poland entrepreneurship is often perceived as an extremely risky process and entrepreneurs are often portrayed in a negative light. The research goals of our exploratory study is to identify the entrepreneurship metaphors among Polish management students.  

Research Design & Methods: Authors decided to run both qualitative and quantitative research. In the first part we addressed 124 management students on three levels BA, MA and MBA. The respondents were asked to give their metaphorical expressions on paper. The next step was to prepare a questionnaire based on 7 point Likert scale. This questionnaire was run among BA management student group composed of 82 students.

Findings: Our results suggest that there are several major entrepreneurial narratives evident among all three groups including creativity and innovation, competition, war, journey, risk, adventure and exploitation.

Implications & Recommendations: The empirical findings serve as a starting point for further in-depth research in this area. It is recommended that in order to gain a complete picture of the issues underlying the results, both qualitative and quantitative research on a bigger sample should be undertaken.

Contribution & Value Added: The originality of this work lies in studying some aspects of entrepreneurship metaphors among non-entrepreneurs in Poland. With regards to the research limitation, it must be highlighted that it was a pilot study and the results cannot be generalized.

Keywords

Metaphors of entrepreneurship, entreprenurship, metaphors, research, Poland

References

1. Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
2. Chmielecki, M. (2013). Development of corporate entrepreneurship in the context of human re-source management and organizational culture in Polish organizations – research results. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, 14(9), 101-116.
3. Churchill, N., & Levis, V. (1983).The Five Stages of Small Business Growth. Harvard Business Review, May-June.
4. Cooper, A. (2003). Entrepreneurship: The Past, the Present, the Future. In Z.J. Acs & D. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research (pp. 21-34). Boston: Kluwer.
5. Deakins, D. (1999). Entrepreneurship and Small Firms. London: McGraw-Hill.
6. Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
7. Dodd, S.D. (2002). Metaphors and meaning: A grounded cultural model of US entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(5), 519-535.
8. Frey, R.F. (1993). Enterprenaurship. A Planing Approach. Eagan: West Publishing Company.
9. Gartener, W.C. (1993). Image formation process. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 2(2-3), 191-216.
10. Gentner, D., & Jeziorski, M. (1993). The Shift From Metaphor To Analogy In Western Science. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 447-480). Cambridge, England: Cambridge Univer-sity Press.
11. Flores, L.Y., Robitschek, C., Celebi, E., Andersen, C., & Hoang, U. (2010). Social cognitive influences on Mexican Americans’ career choices across Holland’s themes. Journal of Vocational Behav-ior, 76, 198-210.
12. Hayton, J.C., George, G., & Zahra, S.A. (2002). National Culture and Entrepreneurship: A Review of Behavioral Research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), 33-52.
13. Henderson, W. (1982). Metaphor in Economics. Economics, 18(4), 147-157.
14. Hill, R.C., & Levenhagen, M. (1995). Metaphors and mental models: Sensemaking and sensegiving in innovative and entrepreneurial activities. Journal of Management, (21)6, 1057-1074.
15. Hisrich, R.D., & Peters, M.P. (1992). Entrepreneurship. Starting, Developing and Managing a New Enterprise. 2nd ed. Boston: IRWING.
16. Hyrsky, K. (1999). Entrepreneurial metaphors and concepts: An exploratory study. International Small Business Journal, 18(1), 13-34.
17. Knowles, M., & Moon, R. (2006). Introducing Metaphor. Abingdon: Routledge.
18. Koiranen, M. (1995). North-European metaphors and of ‘entrepreneurship’ and ‘an entrepreneur’. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1995 Edition, pp. 203-216.
19. Kraśnicka, T. (2001). Przedsiębiorczość jako przedmiot badań ekonomistów. Ekonomia, 4, 187-200.
20. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Leong, F.T.L. (2010). A Cultural Formulation Approach to Career Assessment and Career Counseling: Guest Editor’s Introduction. Journal of Career Development, 37, 375-390.
22. McCloskey, D. (1995). Metaphors Economists Live By. Social Research, 62(2), 215-237.
23. Nicholson, L., & Anderson, A. (2005). News and nuances of the entrepreneurial myth and metaphor: Linguistic games in entrepreneurial sense-making and sense-giving. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 153-172.
24. Ozaralli, N., & Rivenburgh , N.K. (2016). Entrepreneurial intention: antecedents to entrepreneurial behavior in the U.S.A. and Turkey. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 6(3). doi: 10.1186/s40497-016-0047-x
25. Palmer, I., & Dunford, R. (1996). Conflicting uses of metaphors: Reconceptualizing their use in the field of organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 21(3), 691-717.
26. Timmons, J. (1990). New Venture Creation. Boston: IRVIN.
27. Piasecki, B. (1998). Przedsiębiorczość i mała firma. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
28. Schumpeter, J.A. (1934|2008). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capi-tal, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle. New Brunswick – London: Transaction Publishers.
29. Schön, D.A. (1979). Generative Metaphor: A Perspective On Problem Setting in Social Policy. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 137-163). Cambridge, England: Cambridge Univer-sity Press.
30. Sudoł, S. (2008). Przedsiębiorczość – jej pojmowanie, typy i czynniki ją kształtujące. Problemy Zarządzania, 6(2), 9-26.
31. Sułkowski, Ł. (2012). Barriers to entrepreneurship in the management of hospitals in Poland. In C. Martin & T. Rkibi (Eds.), L’entrepreneur face aux politiques publiques europeennes (pp. 382-388). Lisboa: PGV/ISLA.
32. Vasiloaia, M., Gaisoa, M., & Vergara, N. (2011). Metaphors business linguistic culture lives by. Economy Transdisciplinarity Cognition, 14(1), 231-240.
33. Wach, K. (2015). Przedsiębiorczość jako czynnik rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego: przegląd litera-tury. Przedsiębiorczość – Edukacja, 11, 24-36.
34. Wach, K., & Wojciechowski, L. (2016). Entrepreneurial Intentions of Students in Poland in the View of Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behaviour. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(1), 83-94. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2016.040106
35. Walsh, J.P. (1995). Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6, 280-321.
36. Wickman, S., Daniels, M., White, L., & Fesmire, S. (1999). A primer in conceptual metaphor for counselors. Journal of Counseling & Development, 77(4), 389-394.