Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Measuring Entrepreneurial Orientation in the Social Context

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2016.040309

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this paper is to identify differences between measurement of organisational entrepreneurship in for-profit and non-profit context and to propose the measures aligned to non-profit organisations. The main research question is whether the scales designed to measure entrepreneurial orientation can be used in non-profit organisations and under which conditions.

Research, Design & Methods: Research methodology is based on review of research tools and measurement scales related to organisational entrepreneurship and comparison of for-profit and non-profit organisations, as well as their characteristics in the context of entrepreneurial orientation.

Findings: Entrepreneurial orientation can be measured in non-profit organisations using existing scales that have been designed for business organisations, however they have to be modified, mostly in the dimension of competitive aggressiveness and autonomy. Additionally, the scale should be enriched with items related to cooperation with other organisations.

Implications & Recommendations: It is necessary to develop methods and tools that enable the measurement of entrepreneurial orientation in non-profit organisation as well as comparative research on entrepreneurial orientation in for-profit and non-profit organisations.

Contribution & Value Added: The originality of this work lies in studying some aspects of entrepreneurial orientation, that apply to the social context. Some suggestions were formulated relating to the utilisation of entrepreneurial orientation scales (originally designed for business enterprises) in non-profit organisations.

Keywords

social entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial orientation, autonomy, inter-organisational cooperation

PDF Measurnig Entrepreneurial Orientation in the Social Context Measurnig Entrepreneurial Orientation in the Social Context Measurnig Entrepreneurial Orientation in the Social Context

References

  1. Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both?. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x
  2. Bhargava, S. (2008). Entrepreneurial Management: Emergence of a New Field. In S. Bhargava (Ed.), Entrepreneurial Management (pp. 1-41). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
  3. Bornstein, D. (2009). Jak zmieniać Świat. Przedsiębiorcy społeczni - wizjonerzy naszych czasów. Gdańsk: AnWero Wydawnictwo
  4. Bygrave, W.D., & Hofer, C.W. (1991). Theorizing about entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(2), 13-22.
  5. Casson, M. (1982). The entrepreneur. Totowa, NJ: Barnes & Noble Books.
  6. Covin, J.G., & Slevin, D.P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 75-87. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250100107
  7. Covin, J.G., & Wales, W.J. (2012). The Measurement of Entrepreneurial Orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 677-702. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00432.x
  8. Davis, J.A., Marino, L.D., Aaron, J.R., & Tolbert, C.L. (2011). An Examination of Entrepreneurial Orientation, Environmental Scanning, and Market Strategies of Nonprofit and For-Profit Nurs-ing Home Administrators. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 197-211. doi: 10.1111/10.117/0899764009351112
  9. Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2006). Defining social enterprise. In M. Nyssens (Ed.), Social Enter-prise. At the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society (pp. 3-26). London and New York: Routledge.
  10. Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2012). The EMES approach of social enterprise in a comparative per-spective. EMES Working Papers Series, 12(3). Retrieved on April 30, 2016 from http://www.emes.net
  11. European Commission (2011). Social Business Initiative: Creating a favorable climate for social enterprises, key stakeholders in the social economy and innovation. COM (2011) 682 final, Brussels.
  12. European Commission. (2014). A map of social enterprises and their ecosystems in Europe. Execu-tive Summary. London: ICF Consulting Service.
  13. Frank, H., Kessler, A., & Fink, M. (2010). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance - a Replication Study. Schmalenbach Business Review, 62, 175-198.
  14. Gartner, W.B. (1989). "Who is an entrepreneur?" Is the wrong question. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Summer, 47-67.
  15. Hisrich, R.D., Peters, M.P., & Shepherd, D.A. (2005). Entrepreneurship (6th Edition). New York, USA: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
  16. Hughes, M., & Morgan, R.E. (2007). Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance at the embryonic stage of firm growth. Industrial Mar-keting Management, 36,651-661. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2006.04.003
  17. Kirzner, I. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 60-85.
  18. Kuratko, D.F., & Audretsch, D.B. (2013). Clarifying the domains of corporate entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal, 9, 323-335. doi: 10.1007/s11365-013-0257-4
  19. Kusa, R. (2015). Rozwój organizacji i proces przedsiębiorczości. Marketing i Rynek, 5, 696-707.
  20. Leutner, F., Ahmetoglu, G., Akhtar, R., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T., (2014). The relationship between the entrepreneurial personality and the Big Five personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.042
  21. Lumpkin, G.T., & Dess, G.G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21, 135-172.
  22. Lumpkin, G.T., Moss, T.W., Gras, D.M., Kato, S., & Amezcua, A.S. (2013). Entrepreneurial processes in social contexts: how are they different, if at all? Small Business Economics, 40, 761-783. doi:10.1007/s11187-011-9399-3
  23. Ma, H., & Tan J., (2006). Key components and implications of entrepreneurship: A 4-P framework. Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 704-725. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1552136
  24. Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41, 36-44.
  25. Maier, F., Meyer, M., & Steinbereithner, M. (2014). Nonprofit Organizations Becoming Business-Like: A Systematic Review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 1-23. doi:10.1177/ 0899764014561796
  26. McGrath, R.G., & MacMillan, I.C. (2000). The Entrepreneurial Mindset: Strategies for Continuosly Creating Opportunity in the Age of Uncertainty. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  27. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770-791.
  28. Morris, M.H. (1998). Entrepreneurial Intensity: sustainable advantages for individuals, organiza-tions and societies. Westport CT: Quorum Books.
  29. Morris, M.H., & Kuratko D.F. (2002). Corporate Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurial Development within Organizations. Thomson South-Western.
  30. Morris, M.H., Webb, J.W., & Franklin, R.J. (2011). Understanding the Manifestation of Entrepre-neurial Orientation in the Nonprofit Context. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 947-971. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00453.x
  31. Pearce, J.A.II, Fritz, D.A., & Davis, P.S. (2009). Entrepreneurial Orientation and the Performance of Religious Congregations as Predicted by Rational Choice Theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(1), 219-248. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00315.x
  32. Schillo, S. (2011). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Company Performance: Can the Academic Liter-ature Guide Managers? Technology Innovation Management Review, November, 20-25.
  33. Shane, S., & Venkatraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217-226.
  34. Sharma, P., & Chrisman, J.J. (1999). Toward a Reconciliation of the Definitional Issues in the Field of Corporate Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 11-28.
  35. Stevenson, H.H., Roberts M.J., & Grousbeck H.I. (1989). New Business Ventures and the Entrepreneur. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
  36. Stevenson, H.H., & Jarillo J.C. (1990). A Paradigm of Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Management. Strategic Management Journal, 11(4), 17-27.
  37. Terjesen, S., Lepoutre, J., Justo, R., & Bosma, N. (2011). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Report on Social Entrepreneurship. GEM: Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.
  38. Verreynne, M.L., Miles, M.P., & Harris, C. (2013). A short note on entrepreneurship as method: a social enterprise perspective. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal, 9, 113-128. doi: 10.1007/s11365-012-0239-y
  39. Yunus, M. (2011). Przedsiębiorstwo społeczne. Kapitalizm dla ludzi. Warszawa: ConCorda.
  40. Zahra, S.A. (1991). Predictors and Financial Outcomes of Corporate Entrepreneurship: An Explora-tory Study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(4), 259-286. doi: 10.1016/0883-9026(91)90019-A
  41. Żur, A. (2013). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Challenges for Research and Practice. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 1(2), 7-27. doi: 10.15678/ EBER.2013.010202

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.